Literature DB >> 32428059

Effect of violet LED light on in-office bleaching protocols: a randomized controlled clinical trial.

Matheus Kury1, Erica Eiko Wada1, Daylana Pacheco da Silva1, Cínthia Pereira Machado Tabchoury2, Marcelo Giannini1, Vanessa Cavalli1.   

Abstract

Objective This study evaluated the clinical effect of violet LED light on in-office bleaching used alone or combined with 37% carbamide peroxide (CP) or 35% hydrogen peroxide (HP). Methodology A total of 100 patients were divided into five groups (n=20): LED, LED/CP, CP, LED/HP and HP. Colorimetric evaluation was performed using a spectrophotometer (ΔE, ΔL, Δa, Δb) and a visual shade guide (ΔSGU). Calcium (Ca)/phosphorous (P) ratio was quantified in the enamel microbiopsies. Measurements were performed at baseline (T 0 ), after bleaching (T B ) and in the 14-day follow-up (T 14 ). At each bleaching session, a visual scale determined the absolute risk (AR) and intensity of tooth sensitivity (TS). Data were evaluated by one-way (ΔE, Δa, ΔL, Δb), two-way repeated measures ANOVA (Ca/P ratio), and Tukey post-hoc tests. ΔSGU and TS were evaluated by Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney, and AR by Chi-Squared tests (a=5%). Results LED produced the lowest ΔE (p<0.05), but LED/HP promoted greater ΔE, ΔSGU and Δb (T 14 ) than HP (p<0.05). No differences were observed in ΔE and ΔSGU for LED/CP and HP groups (p>0.05). ΔL and Δa were not influenced by LED activation. After bleaching, LED/CP exhibited greater Δb than CP (p>0.05), but no differences were found between these groups at T 14 (p>0.05). LED treatment promoted the lowest risk of TS (16%), while HP promoted the highest (94.4%) (p<0.05). No statistical differences of risk of TS were found for CP (44%), LED/CP (61%) and LED/HP (88%) groups (p>0.05). No differences were found in enamel Ca/P ratio among treatments, regardless of evaluation times. Conclusions Violet LED alone produced the lowest bleaching effect, but enhanced HP bleaching results. Patients treated with LED/CP reached the same efficacy of HP, with reduced risk and intensity of tooth sensitivity and none of the bleaching protocols adversely affected enamel mineral content.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32428059     DOI: 10.1590/1678-7757-2019-0720

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci        ISSN: 1678-7757            Impact factor:   2.698


  3 in total

1.  Characterization and effectiveness of a violet LED light for in-office whitening.

Authors:  Matheus Kury; Frederick A Rueggeberg; Jorge R Soto-Montero; Carolina B André; Bruna A Resende; Marcelo Giannini; Vanessa Cavalli
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  In-office dental bleaching with violet light emitting diode: bleaching efficacy and pulpal temperature rise.

Authors:  Brunna Katyuscia de Almeida Guanaes; Talyta Neves Duarte; Gisele Maria Correr; Marina da Rosa Kaizer; Carla Castiglia Gonzaga
Journal:  Restor Dent Endod       Date:  2022-02-03

3.  Colorimetric evaluation after in-office tooth bleaching with violet LED: 6- and 12-month follow-ups of a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Matheus Kury; Erica Eiko Wada; Samuel da Silva Palandi; Mayara Zaghi Dal Picolo; Marcelo Giannini; Vanessa Cavalli
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-07-16       Impact factor: 3.573

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.