Literature DB >> 32427172

Coronavirus disease 2019 antibody testing in pregnancy.

Fabrizio Zullo1, Daniele Di Mascio2, Gabriele Saccone1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32427172      PMCID: PMC7233207          DOI: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2020.100142

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM


× No keyword cloud information.
The novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is the virus responsible for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), which has been associated with maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality. , Almost all patients with COVID-19 have a positive result for antiviral immunoglobulin G (IgG) within approximately 10–20 days after symptom onset (Figure 1 ), but the clinical value of antibody testing has not yet been completely elucidated, either in nonpregnant or particularly in pregnant patients.
Figure 1

Antibody response against SARS-COV-2 based on data from several published reports

Modified from Sethuraman et al.

NP, nasopharyngeal; RTPCR, reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction; SARS-CoV-2, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2.

Zullo. Antibody response to COVID-19. AJOG MFM 2020.

Antibody response against SARS-COV-2 based on data from several published reports Modified from Sethuraman et al. NP, nasopharyngeal; RTPCR, reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction; SARS-CoV-2, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. Zullo. Antibody response to COVID-19. AJOG MFM 2020. There are different ways to test for antibodies against SARS-CoV-2. The 3 most commonly used methods are IgM and IgG titer measured by either chemiluminescence immunoassay analysis or enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and a rapid (results within 15 minutes) IgM-IgG combined antibody test. Their sensitivities and specificities vary and are still being studied but have been reported to be approximately 48%, 89%, and 89%, respectively, and 100%, 91%, and 91%, respectively.3, 4, 5 Testing pregnant women for antibody response to COVID-19 may have different advantages, such as identifying (1) possibly “healed” women (eg, IgG positive) who were never tested with real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assay using nasopharyngeal (NP) swab specimens and (2) women who are still at risk for COVID-19 infection (eg, IgM and IgG negative). Women who do know their infectious status represent a potential threat to others, including healthcare workers (HCWs) and other patients. Indeed, some governments have suggested that the detection of antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 could serve as the basis for an “immunity passport” or “risk-free certificate” (digital or physical documents that certify an individual has been infected and is purportedly immune to SARS-CoV-2) that would enable individuals to, for example, return to work or travel assuming that they are protected against reinfection. The use of the point-of-care rapid combined antibody test can be of paramount importance in obstetrical healthcare settings and may be particularly helpful in testing women before outpatient (Figure 2 , A) and inpatient (Figure 2, B) visits. After the rapid test, the following results can be reported:
Figure 2

Algorithm for rapid combined antibody test used at the University of Naples Federico II (Naples, Italy)

A, For women before admission to inpatient monitoring. B, For women scheduled for outpatient appointment.

COVID-19, coronavirus disease 2019; GP, general practitioner; NP, nasopharyngeal; RT-PCR, reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction.

Zullo. Antibody response to COVID-19. AJOG MFM 2020.

IgG negative and IgM negative IgG positive and IgM negative. There are limited data on when IgM disappears. , Therefore, even if there is a high likelihood that the tested person is not contagious anymore, an NP swab should be offered. IgG positive, IgM positive or IgG negative, IgM positive. The presence of IgM increases the possibility that the tested person is still contagious. Algorithm for rapid combined antibody test used at the University of Naples Federico II (Naples, Italy) A, For women before admission to inpatient monitoring. B, For women scheduled for outpatient appointment. COVID-19, coronavirus disease 2019; GP, general practitioner; NP, nasopharyngeal; RT-PCR, reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction. Zullo. Antibody response to COVID-19. AJOG MFM 2020. We suggest that if rapid antibody testing and personnel are available, algorithms for care before outpatient and inpatient care of pregnant women be implemented (Figure 2). At our institution, the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology at University of Naples Federico II (Naples, Italy), all pregnant women are tested with rapid combined antibody test before hospital admission. If the rapid antibody test is positive to either SARS-CoV-2 IgM or IgG, we do offer the NP swab and consider these women COVID-19 positive until the result of the NP swab is available. Patients with a positive result to rapid combined antibody test are isolated, and inpatient admission is postponed while awaiting the results of the NP swab, if feasible (eg, planned cesarean delivery, induction of labor, surgical procedure). If it is not feasible to postpone the admission (eg, laboring or bleeding pregnant women), the patient is admitted to the COVID unit and managed as COVID-19 positive (Figure 2, A). For example, in our department, recently 2 pregnant women with positive IgG and IgM had admission to the hospital postponed for 24 hours while awaiting the NP swab test result. In the case of another patient who had a positive result for IgM, postponed hospital admission was not feasible because of heavy bleeding in a first-trimester spontaneous abortion. The patient underwent an NP swab and was admitted to the COVID unit where she received dilation and curettage. The result of the RT-PCR assay, available the day after, showed positivity for SARS-CoV-2. Furthermore, we are now testing women scheduled for outpatient visits. Those who had a positive result for either IgM or IgG at the rapid combined antibody test are offered with NP swab, and the outpatient appointment is postponed (Figure 2, B). Women with previous infection and “certified” recovered because of 2 negative NP swabs 24 hours apart are not tested for antibody response to COVID-19. It would also be helpful to test visitors and HCWs, if feasible. In our department, we have mandatory rapid antibody testing for all HCWs every 7 days. HCWs who have a positive result for either IgM or IgG self-isolate at home while awaiting the results of the NP swab. In summary, we recommend testing for antibody response to SARS-CoV-2 for pregnant women before receiving care in both inpatient and outpatient settings, as feasible (Figure 2). Those who have a positive result to either IgM or IgG rapid immunoassay should undergo an NP swab, and admission or appointment should be postponed, if feasible, until NP swab test results are available, and they should be considered COVID-19 positive in the meanwhile (Figure 2).
  6 in total

1.  Interpreting Diagnostic Tests for SARS-CoV-2.

Authors:  Nandini Sethuraman; Sundararaj Stanleyraj Jeremiah; Akihide Ryo
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2020-06-09       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Privileges and Immunity Certification During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Mark A Hall; David M Studdert
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2020-06-09       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Development and clinical application of a rapid IgM-IgG combined antibody test for SARS-CoV-2 infection diagnosis.

Authors:  Zhengtu Li; Yongxiang Yi; Xiaomei Luo; Nian Xiong; Yang Liu; Shaoqiang Li; Ruilin Sun; Yanqun Wang; Bicheng Hu; Wei Chen; Yongchen Zhang; Jing Wang; Baofu Huang; Ye Lin; Jiasheng Yang; Wensheng Cai; Xuefeng Wang; Jing Cheng; Zhiqiang Chen; Kangjun Sun; Weimin Pan; Zhifei Zhan; Liyan Chen; Feng Ye
Journal:  J Med Virol       Date:  2020-04-13       Impact factor: 2.327

4.  Diagnostic value and dynamic variance of serum antibody in coronavirus disease 2019.

Authors:  Yujiao Jin; Miaochan Wang; Zhongbao Zuo; Chaoming Fan; Fei Ye; Zhaobin Cai; Ying Wang; Huaizhong Cui; Kenu Pan; Aifang Xu
Journal:  Int J Infect Dis       Date:  2020-04-03       Impact factor: 3.623

5.  Coronavirus disease 2019 infection among asymptomatic and symptomatic pregnant women: two weeks of confirmed presentations to an affiliated pair of New York City hospitals.

Authors:  Noelle Breslin; Caitlin Baptiste; Cynthia Gyamfi-Bannerman; Russell Miller; Rebecca Martinez; Kyra Bernstein; Laurence Ring; Ruth Landau; Stephanie Purisch; Alexander M Friedman; Karin Fuchs; Desmond Sutton; Maria Andrikopoulou; Devon Rupley; Jean-Ju Sheen; Janice Aubey; Noelia Zork; Leslie Moroz; Mirella Mourad; Ronald Wapner; Lynn L Simpson; Mary E D'Alton; Dena Goffman
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM       Date:  2020-04-09

6.  Clinical course of severe and critical coronavirus disease 2019 in hospitalized pregnancies: a United States cohort study.

Authors:  Rebecca A M Pierce-Williams; Julia Burd; Laura Felder; Rasha Khoury; Peter S Bernstein; Karina Avila; Christina A Penfield; Ashley S Roman; Chelsea A DeBolt; Joanne L Stone; Angela Bianco; Adina R Kern-Goldberger; Adi Hirshberg; Sindhu K Srinivas; Jenani S Jayakumaran; Justin S Brandt; Hannah Anastasio; Meredith Birsner; Devon S O'Brien; Harish M Sedev; Cara D Dolin; William T Schnettler; Anju Suhag; Shabani Ahluwalia; Reshama S Navathe; Adeeb Khalifeh; Kathryn Anderson; Vincenzo Berghella
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM       Date:  2020-05-08
  6 in total
  3 in total

Review 1.  [Pregnancy, birth, and puerperium with SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19].

Authors:  C Hagenbeck; U Pecks; T Fehm; F Borgmeier; E Schleußner; J Zöllkau
Journal:  Gynakologe       Date:  2020-07-13

2.  Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) universal screening in gravids during labor and delivery.

Authors:  Ricardo Savirón-Cornudella; Ana Villalba; Javier Zapardiel; Mercedes Andeyro-Garcia; Luis M Esteban; Faustino R Pérez-López
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 2.435

3.  Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies among first-trimester pregnant women during the second wave of the pandemic in India.

Authors:  Kandala Aparna Sharma; Nilanchali Singh; Sara Hillman; Purva Mathur; Kapil Yadav; Anapti Garg; Vatsla Dadhwal; Neerja Bhatla
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2022-03-24       Impact factor: 4.447

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.