Literature DB >> 32426898

Feasibility and utility of transbronchial cryobiopsy in precision medicine for lung cancer: Prospective single-arm study.

Hibiki Udagawa1, Keisuke Kirita1, Tomoyuki Naito1, Shogo Nomura2, Masayuki Ishibashi1, Reiko Matsuzawa1, Kakeru Hisakane1, Yuko Usui1, Shingo Matsumoto1, Kiyotaka Yoh1, Seiji Niho1, Genichiro Ishii3, Koichi Goto1.   

Abstract

Cryoprobe is a novel transbronchial biopsy (TBB) tool that yields larger tissue samples than forceps. Pathological diagnosis and biomarker analysis, such as genetic alterations and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression, are paramount for precision medicine against lung cancer. We evaluated the safety and usefulness of cryoprobe TBB for lung cancer diagnosis and biomarker analysis. In this single-center, prospective single-arm study, patients suspected of having or diagnosed with primary lung cancer underwent cryoprobe TBB using flexible bronchoscopy after conventional forceps TBB from the same lesion. Cryoprobe TBB was performed in 121 patients. The incidence rate of severe bleeding and serious adverse events (4% [90% confidence interval: 2%-9%]) was significantly lower than the expected rate (20% with 30% threshold, P < 0.01). Combining both central and peripheral lesions, the diagnostic yield rate of cryoprobe samples was 76% and that of forceps samples was 84%. Compared with forceps TBB samples, cryoprobe TBB samples were larger (cryoprobe 15 mm2 vs forceps 2 mm2 ) and resulted in a larger proportion of definite histomorphological diagnosis (cryoprobe 86% vs forceps 74%, P < 0.01), larger amounts of DNA extracted from samples (median: cryoprobe, 1.60 µg vs forceps, 0.58 µg, P = 0.02) and RNA (median: cryoprobe, 0.62 µg vs forceps, 0.17 µg, P < 0.01) extracted from samples, and tended to yield greater rates of PD-L1 expression >1% (51% vs 42%). In conclusion, cryoprobe is a safe and useful tool for obtaining lung cancer tissue samples of adequate size and quality, which allow morphological diagnosis and biomarker analysis for precision medicine against lung cancer.
© 2020 The Authors. Cancer Science published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japanese Cancer Association.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biomarker; cryobiopsy; cryoprobe; immunohistochemistry; lung cancer

Year:  2020        PMID: 32426898     DOI: 10.1111/cas.14489

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Sci        ISSN: 1347-9032            Impact factor:   6.716


  10 in total

1.  Diagnosis of miliary nodules as lung adenocarcinoma by cryobiopsy: A case report.

Authors:  Momoko Morishita; Manabu Suzuki; Hiromu Watanabe; Chie Morita; Akane Ishida; Masao Hashimoto; Go Naka; Yuichiro Takeda; Masayuki Hojo; Haruhito Sugiyama
Journal:  Thorac Cancer       Date:  2021-03-23       Impact factor: 3.500

Review 2.  Cryobiopsy in Lung Cancer Diagnosis-A Literature Review.

Authors:  Mărioara Simon; Ioan Simon; Paul Andrei Tent; Doina Adina Todea; Antonia Haranguș
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2021-04-19       Impact factor: 2.430

3.  Efficacy and Safety of Cryobiopsy vs. Forceps Biopsy for Interstitial Lung Diseases, Lung Tumors, and Peripheral Pulmonary Lesions: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Mohan Giri; Guichuan Huang; Anju Puri; Rongjuan Zhuang; Yishi Li; Shuliang Guo
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-03-10

4.  Using the GenCut core biopsy tool with the radial endobronchial ultrasound guide sheath enables a high-quality histology sample capable of programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) testing.

Authors:  Samantha Herath; Farzad Bashirzadeh; Hema Mahajan; Alvin Ing; David Fielding
Journal:  Respirol Case Rep       Date:  2022-04-04

5.  The Impact of Core Tissues on Successful Next-Generation Sequencing Analysis of Specimens Obtained through Endobronchial Ultrasound-Guided Transbronchial Needle Aspiration.

Authors:  Keigo Uchimura; Komei Yanase; Tatsuya Imabayashi; Yuki Takeyasu; Hideaki Furuse; Midori Tanaka; Yuji Matsumoto; Shinji Sasada; Takaaki Tsuchida
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-23       Impact factor: 6.639

6.  Comparison of the analytical performance of the Oncomine dx target test focusing on bronchoscopic biopsy forceps size in non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Tadashi Sakaguchi; Yoichi Nishii; Akemi Iketani; Seiya Esumi; Maki Esumi; Kazuki Furuhashi; Yuki Nakamura; Yuta Suzuki; Kentaro Ito; Kentaro Fujiwara; Koji Katsuta; Osamu Taguchi; Osamu Hataji
Journal:  Thorac Cancer       Date:  2022-04-05       Impact factor: 3.223

7.  A Prospective Validation Study of Lung Cancer Gene Panel Testing Using Cytological Specimens.

Authors:  Kei Morikawa; Hirotaka Kida; Hiroshi Handa; Takeo Inoue; Hisashi Saji; Junki Koike; Seiji Nakamura; Yoshiharu Sato; Yumi Ueda; Fumihiko Suzuki; Ryo Matoba; Masamichi Mineshita
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-03       Impact factor: 6.575

8.  Comparison of adequacy between transbronchial lung cryobiopsy samples and endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration samples for next-generation sequencing analysis.

Authors:  Mari Tone; Minoru Inomata; Nobuyasu Awano; Naoyuki Kuse; Kohei Takada; Jonsu Minami; Yutaka Muto; Kazushi Fujimoto; Toshio Kumasaka; Takehiro Izumo
Journal:  Thorac Cancer       Date:  2020-12-03       Impact factor: 3.223

9.  Diagnostic Yield of Transbronchial Cryobiopsy Guided by Radial Endobronchial Ultrasound and Fluoroscopy in the Radiologically Suspected Lung Cancer: A Single Institution Prospective Study.

Authors:  Vytautas Ankudavicius; Skaidrius Miliauskas; Lina Poskiene; Donatas Vajauskas; Marius Zemaitis
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 6.639

10.  Suitability of transbronchial brushing cytology specimens for next-generation sequencing in peripheral lung cancer.

Authors:  Naoki Furuya; Shingo Matsumoto; Kazutaka Kakinuma; Kei Morikawa; Takeo Inoue; Hisashi Saji; Koichi Goto; Masamichi Mineshita
Journal:  Cancer Sci       Date:  2020-11-17       Impact factor: 6.518

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.