Lovedeep Kaur1,2, Seah Xin Hui1, Mike Boland2. 1. School of Food and Advanced Technology, Massey University, 4442 Palmerston North, New Zealand. 2. Riddet Institute, Massey University, 4442 Palmerston North, New Zealand.
Meat tenderness is generally considered by the consumer to be the most important
palatability factor. Post-mortem tenderization in skeletal muscle is a complex
phenomenon that has yet to be fully understood. Muscle is tender right after the
animal is slaughtered but once the onset of rigor mortis, a permanent cross-link
between actin and myosin proteins is formed and this leads to muscle toughness
(Bowker et al., 2010). Beef requires
ageing for at least 14 d in a controlled environment with temperature ranging from
−1°C to 5°C to achieve tenderness (Christian and Stephen, 2010). During this period, the
degradation of muscle contributes to meat tenderness. This process is known as
post-mortem aging (also known as maturation or conditioning) of meat and is widely
practiced by beef producers (Chéret et al.,
2007; Christian and Stephen,
2010).Sarcoplasmic proteases are crucial in protein catabolism and post-mortem muscle
softening. It is believed that two main proteolytic systems are involved in the
tenderization of meat: the cathepsins and the calpains. Many researchers consider
the calpain system to be the major contributor to meat tenderness during post-mortem
aging (Koohmarie and Geesink, 2006). However,
this assumption has been debated (Herrera-Mendez et
al., 2006) and the role of cathepsins is not fully understood yet.
Cathepsins exhibit greater heat stability than calpains (Laakkonen et al., 1970; Pomponio and Ertbjerg, 2012) as the latter have been reported to
completely inactivate at temperatures above 55°C whereas cathepsins,
particularly B and L have been reported to remain active even after 24 h of heating
at 55°C (Christensen et al., 2011;
Ertbjerg et al., 2012). Cathepsin D has
also been reported to have a lower heat resistance compared with cathepsin B and L
(Spanier et al., 1990). Cathepsin B and L
are endopeptidases that may contribute to meat tenderness by weakening collagen in
connective tissue, leading to its increased solubility (Agarwal, 1990; Christensen et
al., 2013; Solvig, 2014).
Incubation of connective tissue with cathepsin B has been reported to significantly
decrease the denaturation temperature of connective tissue from both calf and steer
(Beltrán et al., 1992). In
addition, a study by Burleigh et al. (1974)
has shown that cathepsin B contributes to the degradation of both soluble and
insoluble collagen by eliminating intermolecular cross-links.In addition to proteolysis during ageing, meat tenderness may continue to develop
during the cooking step, particularly when the meat is heated for a longer duration
at temperature that is optimum for enzyme activity (Ertbjerg et al., 2012). Sous vide is a method of cooking vacuum-packaged
food at a precise temperature for a long duration, from hours to days (Baldwin, 2012). This form of cooking helps to
retain moisture and is known to produce tender and juicy meat (Laakkonen et al., 1970). Temperatures from 55°C to
80°C and cooking for 6 to 48 h are typical conditions for cooking meat (Baldwin, 2012).We hypothesized that cathepsins would remain active during sous vide cooking and
could still contribute to the tenderization process of beef brisket during the
cooking process as opposed to cooking meat at high heat such as grilling whereby
high cooking temperature and time is often associated with the toughening of meat.
Limited studies have been done to examine the effects of sous vide cooking on the
proteolytic enzyme activities in tough beef muscle cuts such as brisket. Thus this
investigation was designed to study the effects of (1) post-mortem storage and (2)
sous vide cooking at different temperatures (50°C−70°C) for up
to 24 h on the activities of the B, L, and H cathepsins in beef brisket, which will
aid in determining the contribution of these cathepsins to tenderness of tough cuts
of meat.
Materials and Methods
Materials
All chemicals used in the study were of analytical grade.
Muscle samples and preparation
Hot-boned briskets from three steers at 4 h post-mortem were kindly provided by a
local slaughterhouse (ANZCO Foods, Bulls, New Zealand) and immediately
transported to the laboratory. At approximately 6 h post-mortem, muscles were
cut into small samples of 2 cm3 or thin strips after removal of the
visible subcutaneous fat, vacuum packed into portions and stored in either
4°C or −20°C. Post-mortem storage and sous vide experiments
were two separate experiments that were run in parallel, with two different
objectives, but with the samples from the same carcasses. Thus, for each
carcass, the samples were divided into three batches as described in Fig. 1: as control, and for post-mortem
storage and sous vide experiments. Three samples per treatment from different
carcasses were analysed for pH and cathepsin B and H activities as described in
sections 2.5 and 2.6.
Fig. 1.
Experimental plan.
Post-mortem storage experiments
The experiment to assess the effects of post-mortem storage conditions on
cathepsin activities was divided into short-term (6 h to 4 d post-mortem at
either 4°C or −20°C) and long-term storage (further
4–18 d storage at either 4°C or −20°C of the 4 d
refrigerated meat).The vacuum-packed muscle samples were stored in a chiller or freezer at
4°C and −20°C, respectively. At the end of the allocated
storage time (Fig. 1), samples were assayed
for pH and cathepsin activities.
Sous vide experiments
One-day post-mortem meat stored at 4°C was chosen for performing the sous
vide experiments, based on previous reports (Chéret et al., 2007). Slight modifications were made to the
sample preparation procedures reported by Ertbjerg et al. (2012) Meat was cut into small strips, vacuum packed
and stored at 4°C on the day of slaughter (Fig. 1). At one day post-mortem, the vacuum bags containing the meat
strips were cooked in water baths set at 50°C, 55°C, 60°C,
65°C, and 70°C for 1, 5, or 24 h. At the respective time interval,
samples were removed from the water bath and cooled in ice water to below
25°C. The temperature of the water bath was monitored using a digital
thermometer (Q1437, Dick Smith Electronics, Chullora, Australia) to ensure that
the desired temperature had been reached before fully submerging the bags into
the water bath. Since the samples were cut into thin strips and as confirmed
from previous experimentation (Zhu et al.,
2018), it was assumed that the core temperature of the samples
reached the water bath temperature quite quickly (in less than an hour).Three random cooked samples from each carcass were homogenised together and
assayed for pH and cathepsin activities. All samples were stored at
−20°C until analyzed. Cathepsin activities were calculated for
both cooked and raw samples and expressed as a relative activity (%):where A and A0 are the
enzyme activities of cooked and raw samples, respectively.
pH determination
The pH of the meat homogenates were determined with a glass electrode pH meter
(Cyberscan pH 510, Eutech Instruments, Vernon Hills, IL, USA). The pH meter was
calibrated using pH 7.0 and 4.0 standard buffers stored at room temperature.
Meat homogenate was prepared by blending finely-chopped meat with milli-Q water
in a ratio of 1:10 for 1 min using a food processor (BFP100WHT, Breville,
Sydney, Australia).
Preparation of sarcoplasmic protein extract
Sarcoplasmic protein extract was prepared using the method described by Chéret et al. (2007) with slight
modifications. Three random muscle samples from a single carcass were finely
chopped and homogenized with an extraction buffer comprising of Tris–HCl,
2-mercaptoethanol and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid in a ratio of 1:3 for 1
min using a food processor (BFP100WHT, Breville). The homogenized mixture was
centrifuged at 25,000×g for 20 min at 4°C in a Sorvall Evolution
RC centrifuge (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The supernatant was
collected and filtered using 0.45 μm syringe filter and referred to as
crude extract. This crude extract was immediately used for the cathepsin
assays.
Determination of cathepsins B, H, and L activities
Activities of cathepsin B, H, and L were analyzed in the sarcoplasmic extract
using the method described by Chéret et
al. (2007). The cathepsin activities were determined at room
temperature in a 96-well microplate, consisting of 6 μL of 5%
CHAPS prepared in milli-Q water; 1 μL of 1.40 M 2-mercaptoethanol; 16
μL of 5% (w/v) Brij® 35 prepared in milli-Q
water; 5 μL of 20 mM synthetic fluorogenic substrate prepared in methanol
and 70 μL of 0.4 mM acetate/acid acetic (pH 4) buffer containing 10 mM
2-mercaptoethanol and 1 mM EDTA. The substrates for cathepsin B, cathepsin B and
L, and cathepsin H were Z-Arg-Arg-7-amido-4-methylcoumarin hydrochloride (C5429,
Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), Z-Phe-Arg-7-amido-4-methylcoumarin
hydrochloride (C9521, Sigma-Aldrich), and L-Arginine-7-amido-4-methylcoumarin
hydrochloride (A2027, Sigma-Aldrich), respectively. The reaction was initiated
by the addition of 200 μL of crude sarcoplasmic protein extract. The
fluorescence intensity was determined using a microplate reader (Wallace Victor2
1420 multilabel counter, Perkin Elmer, Waltham, MA, USA) with excitation and
emission wavelengths of 355 nm and 460 nm, respectively. A control was run in
parallel in which the protein extract was substituted by extraction buffer.
Cathepsin specific activities were expressed in FU (units of fluorescence)
increase per min per g of muscle. Cathepsin L activity was calculated by
subtracting cathepsin B from the cathepsin B+L activity. Cathepsin D
activity could not be measured in the samples due to technical issues in
standardization of cathepsin D assay. The difficulties in standardising
cathepsin D assay may be attributed by its low activity level in meat and meat
products as reported by Rico et al.
(1991a). Hence, this paper does not report cathepsin D activities in
the samples.
Statistical analysis
Significant differences in pH and enzyme activities among different treatments
were determined by one-way ANOVA Tukey test at the 95% significance level
using Minitab® 17 (Minitab,
2014).
Results and Discussion
Effects of post-mortem storage conditions
Short-term storage
There was no significant difference in pH value and cathepsin H activities
during 4 d of ageing at both chilled and frozen storage conditions (Table 1). Although there was no
significant difference in cathepsin H activities, the numerical difference
between the control and frozen samples could be because
L-Arginine-7-amido-4-methylcoumarin (substrate for cathepsin H) was also
cleaved by aminopeptidase, and under the conditions of the assay some
residual peptidase activity may be present (Toldrá and Etherington, 1988).
Table 1.
pH and activities of endogenous enzymes (cathepsin B and H) in 6
h post-mortem hot boned beef brisket (control) and subsequent
storage at either 4°C or −20°C for 4 d
6 h post-mortem meat
(Control)
4 d post-mortem meat stored at
4°C
4 d post-mortem meat stored at
−20°C
pH
5.78±0.07
5.67±0.04
5.84±0.05
Cathepsin B[1)]
13,004±2,837[C]
36,965±3,294[A]
27,748±2,331[AB]
Cathepsin H[1)]
25,066±4,508
16,910±4,652
14,770±1,335
All values are mean±SE of mean for three replicates.
The units for the enzyme activities are expressed as increase in
FU per min per g of muscle for cathepsin activities.
Different letters in each row are significantly different
(p<0.05).
All values are mean±SE of mean for three replicates.The units for the enzyme activities are expressed as increase in
FU per min per g of muscle for cathepsin activities.Different letters in each row are significantly different
(p<0.05).For cathepsin B, there was a significant increase (compared to 6 h
post-mortem) in its activity after 4 d of ageing at both temperatures
however no significant difference was observed among the storage
temperatures (Table 1). Similar
increase for cathepsin B was observed for sea bream muscles, which was
attributed to enzyme activation by low pH (Matos, 2013). Cathepsin B has an optimum pH of 5.5 towards most
substrates, which is near the ultimate pH of the meat. During post-mortem
storage when the temperature and pH decrease, the fragile membranes of
lysosomes may rupture resulting in the release of cathepsins (Bowker et al., 2010; Lana and Zolla, 2016). Despite the fact
that no significant difference was observed in the pH during 4 d of ageing,
it is possible that the decrease in temperature during storage or the
formation of ice crystals may have ruptured the lysosomes, releasing
cathepsins, therefore contributing to an increase in cathepsin B
activity.
Long-term storage
There was no significant change in pH value throughout subsequent 2
wk’s storage at both temperatures (Table 2). The activities of cathepsins B, L, and H also remained
stable and unchanged during this storage period. Similar results have been
reported for ostrich fillet where cathepsin B and L showed no decrease in
their activities after 12 d storage at 2°C to 4°C (van Jaardveld et al., 1997). Previous
studies have indicated that all cathepsins are capable of degrading myosin
(Allen and Goll, 2003) but no
myosin degradation has been reported during post-mortem storage at
0°C to 4°C (Bandman and Zdanis,
1988). Moreover, the changes in shear force values during
post-mortem ageing for 2 wk at 1.2°C for three types of bovine
muscles were found to be different despite having similar level of
cathepsins B, H, and L (Koohmaraie et al.,
1988). Thus, the tenderizing effect of cathepsins during the long
term storage at refrigerated temperatures remains questionable. Other
proteolytic systems such as caspase, metalloproteases, thrombin, and plasmin
may also be involved during post-mortem ageing (Ouali et al., 2013).
Table 2.
pH and activities of cathepsins in 4 d post-mortem hot boned beef
brisket stored at 4°C (control) and subsequent storage at
either 4°C or −20°C for 14 d
4 d post-mortem meat
stored at 4°C (Control)
Storage at
4°C
Storage at
−20°C
+7 d post-mortem
meat
+14 d post-mortem
meat
+7 d post-mortem
meat
+14 d post-mortem
meat
pH
5.67±0.04
5.65±0.06
5.51±0.02
5.60±0.12
5.55±0.13
Cathepsin B[1)]
36,965±3,294
50,458±16,464
63,613±8,650
48,666±16,037
48,116±23,234
Cathepsin B+L[1)]
ND
551,166±163,651
737,351±57,530
602,593±82,243
532,009±149,737
Cathepsin L[1)]
ND
500,708±147,721
673,738±63,454
553,927±72,387
483,892±131,116
Cathepsin H[1)]
16,910±4,652
36,950±28,727
17,793±2,549
16,558±11,158
16,469±9,480
All values are mean±SE of mean for three replicates.
The units for the enzyme activities are expressed as increase in
FU per min per g of muscle for cathepsin activities.
The values in each row were not significantly (p<0.05)
different.
ND, not determined.
All values are mean±SE of mean for three replicates.The units for the enzyme activities are expressed as increase in
FU per min per g of muscle for cathepsin activities.The values in each row were not significantly (p<0.05)
different.ND, not determined.
Effects of sous vide cooking conditions
pH
At all temperatures, increasing the cooking time did not have a significant
effect on the pH (Table 3). There was
a significant increase (p<0.05) in pH when the temperature increased
from 50°C to 70°C, after 1 and 5 h of cooking. An increase in
pH during cooking has also been observed for bovine muscles
(longissimus, semitendinosus, and
rectus femoris) heated at 60°C for 10 h (Laakkonen et al., 1970). Small
increments in pH upon cooking of meat at 60°C have been reported to
be due to a decrease in acidic groups in the meat proteins (Hamm and Deatherage, 1960).
Table 3.
Effect of sous vide cooking temperatures (50°C to
70°C) and times (0, 1, 5, and 24 h) on the pH of 1 d
post-mortem hot boned beef brisket
Cooking time
Cooking
temperature
50°C
55°C
60°C
65°C
70°C
0 h
5.84±0.05
5.84±0.05
5.84±0.05
5.84±0.05
5.84±0.05
1 h
5.83±0.04[B]
5.95±0.00[A]
5.93±0.03[AB]
5.94±0.03[AB]
6.00±0.02[A]
5 h
5.78±0.02[B]
5.88±0.03[AB]
5.97±0.06[A]
5.97±0.04[A]
6.02±0.03[A]
24 h
5.88±0.05
5.94±0.04
5.95±0.06
5.96±0.04
6.00±0.06
All values are mean±SE of mean for three replicates.
Different uppercase letters in each row are significantly
different among cooking temperatures at the same cooking time
(p<0.05).
All values are mean±SE of mean for three replicates.Different uppercase letters in each row are significantly
different among cooking temperatures at the same cooking time
(p<0.05).
Cathepsin activities
Cathepsin B+L activity was heat stable and these proteases remained
active throughout cooking at 50°C even after 24 h and for the first 5
h at 55°C (Fig. 2). At
50°C, the cathepsin B+L activity increased significantly
(p<0.05) after 1 h, while further cooking led to a decrease in
activity. There was a significant reduction (p<0.05) in cathepsin
B+L activity after cooking at 60°C, 65°C, and
70°C, where most of the extractable activity was lost after 1 h.
Subsequently no significant change (p>0.05) in cathepsin B+L
activity was observed for meat cooked from 5 to 24 h at these temperatures.
The reduction in activity is likely to be due to the heat sensitivity of
cathepsin B and L, combined with the effect of the increase in pH observed
for these treatment conditions. A similar trend was observed for cathepsin B
(Fig. 3) and cathepsin L (Fig. 4) activity. In a study on porcine
longissimus muscle, cathepsin B+L activity was
reported to increase with an increase in temperature from 48°C to
58°C (Christensen et al.,
2011). In another study conducted on beef
semitendinosus muscle, the activity of cathepsins B and
L in the expelled cooking loss was highest after cooking at 53°C for
2.5 h and then decreased with increasing temperature and time (Christensen et al., 2013). All these
observations are consistent with our experimental results. In this present
study, no significant cathepsin B+L activity was detected after 5 h
heating at 60°C. However, a higher heat tolerance of cathepsins B and
L has been reported for beef semitendinosus muscle where
their activity was measurable even after 19.5 h at 63°C (Christensen et al., 2013). This could
be because of the differences among the meat cuts used in both the studies.
Ertbjerg et al. (2012) found that
cathepsin B+L activity reached a maximum after heating at 55°C
for 1.5 h in porcine longissimus muscle. They suggested
that part of cathepsin B and/or cathepsin L may exist in the form of a
pro-enzyme which is activated by heat. An increase in activity was also
observed in our experimental results, which was evident after 1 h of heating
at 50°C. Increases in collagen solubilization and tenderness were
also evidenced in this temperature range (Christensen et al., 2011). The synergistic effect of heat
denaturation and proteolytic action of cathepsins (B and L) has been
reported to account for an increased weakening effect on collagen that led
to more tender meat during sous vide cooking at temperatures
<55°C (Dominguez-Hernandez et
al., 2018).
Fig. 2.
Relative activity of cathepsin B+L in hot boned beef
brisket sous vide cooked at 50°C, 55°C, 60°C,
65°C, and 70°C for 1, 5, and 24 h.
Each data point represents the mean value from three animals (error
bars indicate SE). a–c Different lowercase letters
are significantly different among cooking temperatures at the same
cooking time (p<0.05).
Fig. 3.
Relative activity of cathepsin B in hot boned beef brisket sous
vide cooked at 50°C, 55°C, 60°C, 65°C,
and 70°C for 1, 5, and 24 h.
Each data point represents the mean value from three animals (error
bars indicate SE). a–c Different lowercase letters
are significantly different among cooking temperatures at the same
cooking time (p<0.05).
Fig. 4.
Relative activity of cathepsin L in hot boned beef brisket sous
vide cooked at 50°C, 55°C, 60°C, 65°C,
and 70°C for 1, 5, and 24 h.
Each data point represents the mean value from three animals (error
bars indicate SE). a–c Different lowercase letters
are significantly different among cooking temperatures at the same
cooking time (p<0.05).
Relative activity of cathepsin B+L in hot boned beef
brisket sous vide cooked at 50°C, 55°C, 60°C,
65°C, and 70°C for 1, 5, and 24 h.
Each data point represents the mean value from three animals (error
bars indicate SE). a–c Different lowercase letters
are significantly different among cooking temperatures at the same
cooking time (p<0.05).
Relative activity of cathepsin B in hot boned beef brisket sous
vide cooked at 50°C, 55°C, 60°C, 65°C,
and 70°C for 1, 5, and 24 h.
Each data point represents the mean value from three animals (error
bars indicate SE). a–c Different lowercase letters
are significantly different among cooking temperatures at the same
cooking time (p<0.05).
Relative activity of cathepsin L in hot boned beef brisket sous
vide cooked at 50°C, 55°C, 60°C, 65°C,
and 70°C for 1, 5, and 24 h.
Each data point represents the mean value from three animals (error
bars indicate SE). a–c Different lowercase letters
are significantly different among cooking temperatures at the same
cooking time (p<0.05).At all temperatures, a significant reduction (p<0.05) of cathepsin H
activity occurred during the first hour of cooking (data not shown). At
50°C, cathepsin H remained active (15% of initial activity)
during the first hour but it lost most of the extractable activity within 5
h. At 55°C and above, no extractable activity was detected after 1 h
of cooking. In addition, there was no significant difference (p>0.05)
in cathepsin H activity after 1 h of cooking at temperature ranging from
55°C to 70°C. Thus, it is unlikely that cathepsin H is
responsible for the tenderization effect usually observed during sous vide
cooking of meat at temperatures <70°C.
Conclusion
During post-mortem storage, only cathepsin B activity was observed to increase from 6
h to 4 d post-mortem at both (refrigerated and frozen) storage conditions. There
were no significant changes in cathepsin B, H, and L activities during long-term
storage of two weeks. For the sous vide experiments, the increase in cathepsin
B+L activity at 50°C after 1 h of cooking suggests that cathepsin B
and/or L in beef brisket may also exist in the form of a pro-enzyme, which is
activated by heat. Thus, at this temperature, with a higher cathepsin B+L
activity, these enzymes are likely to be involved in proteolysis and contribute to
the tenderizing effect. Cathepsin B and L were found to be more heat stable at sous
vide temperatures (50°C for 24 h, 55°C for 5 h, and 60°C and
70°C for 1 h) compared to cathepsin H, supporting the hypothesis that
cathepsin B and L remain active at typical sous vide cooking temperatures and could
be involved in the tenderization process.
Authors: Ahmed Ouali; Mohammed Gagaoua; Yasmine Boudida; Samira Becila; Abdelghani Boudjellal; Carlos H Herrera-Mendez; Miguel A Sentandreu Journal: Meat Sci Date: 2013-05-29 Impact factor: 5.209
Authors: Line Christensen; Per Ertbjerg; Hanne Løje; Jens Risbo; Frans W J van den Berg; Mette Christensen Journal: Meat Sci Date: 2012-12-09 Impact factor: 5.209