Targeted therapy of tumors is an effective method for treating cancer. Thymosin alpha 1 (Tα1), a hormone that contains 28 amino acids, is already approved for cancer treatment. However, its clinical application is limited because of the lack of tumor targeting. Considering that RGD can specifically bind to integrin, the anticancer drug can have a targeted therapeutic effect on tumors when it combines with a peptide containing an RGD sequence. We produced a polypeptide, Tα1-RGDR, by binding Tα1 to RGDR. The RGDR can combine with the αvβ3 and NRP-1 domains, which are highly expressed on the surface of the tumor, to achieve the effect of tumor targeting. This work aimed to investigate the difference of antitumor activity and tumor targeting between Tα1 modified by RGDR and Tα1 by using H460 and LLC tumor models. Results showed that Tα1-RGDR had remarkable antitumor effects, and its tumor targeting was better than that of Tα1. Hence, Tα1-RGDR is a promising antitumor drug.
Targeted therapy of tumors is an effective method for treating cancer. Thymosin alpha 1 (Tα1), a hormone that contains 28 amino acids, is already approved for cancer treatment. However, its clinical application is limited because of the lack of tumor targeting. Considering that RGD can specifically bind to integrin, the anticancer drug can have a targeted therapeutic effect on tumors when it combines with a peptide containing an RGD sequence. We produced a polypeptide, Tα1-RGDR, by binding Tα1 to RGDR. The RGDR can combine with the αvβ3 and NRP-1 domains, which are highly expressed on the surface of the tumor, to achieve the effect of tumor targeting. This work aimed to investigate the difference of antitumor activity and tumor targeting between Tα1 modified by RGDR and Tα1 by using H460 and LLC tumor models. Results showed that Tα1-RGDR had remarkable antitumor effects, and its tumor targeting was better than that of Tα1. Hence, Tα1-RGDR is a promising antitumor drug.
With the development of society, an increasing
number of factors,
such as cancer, threaten people’s health. Lung cancer is one
of the leading causes of cancer deaths.[1] In recent years, proteins and peptides have attracted wide attention
due to their good efficacy in treating traditional diseases such as
cancer.[2] Thymosin alpha1 (Tα1) is
one of many polypeptide drugs.[3]Thymosin
alpha 1 (Tα1) is a 28-amino-acid peptide expressed
in the thymus.[3] It was originally used
as an immune booster and has been used in the treatment of immunodeficiency
diseases. As an immunomodulatory compound, Tα1 can significantly
upregulate the production of CD4 + T and CD8 + T cells.[4,5] The interaction between immunologically functional cells and immune
factors CD4 +/CD8 + T cells can mediate the tumor survival environment
and inhibit the growth of gastric cancer cells.[6] In hepatocellular carcinoma, CD4 + T cells mediate cytotoxicity
and exert antitumor immunity.[7] Ma et al.
also demonstrated that CD4 + T lymphocytes can produce high levels
of reactive oxygen species, which can inhibit or delay the development
of liver cancer.[8] The role of Tα1
in immunodeficiency mainly includes the promotion of response between
dendritic cells and antibodies, downregulation of thymocyte apoptosis,
and upregulation of cytokines and chemokines.[9,10] The
maturation of T lymphocytes is derived from the mitosis of peripheral
blood lymphocytes stimulated by many factors, including Tα1.
Tα1 plays an important role in enhancing immunity in the body’s
immune organs and tissues. Tα1 not only promotes T lymphocyte
maturation and increases lymphocyte levels, such as interferon-γ
(IFN-γ) and interleukin-2 (IL-2),[11,12] but also enhances
lymphocyte response by activating CD4 cells.[13] With the great progress in cancer immunotherapy, Tα1 has been
applied to the clinical treatment of cancer.[14] Tα1 can help to present antigens at the time of tumor production,
thus facilitating the induction of immune response and identification
of tumor cells.[15] Tα1 has superior
medical effects in the treatment of advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer[16,17] and melanoma.[18−20]However, Tα1 has antitumor activity;
when it acts on tumor
cells, it also acts on normal cells and causes a series of side effects,
thus limiting its clinical use. In previous studies, Tα1-modified
peptides or Tα1 in combination with other drugs have shown better
antitumor activity than Tα1 alone.[21,22] RGD (Arg-Gly-Asp)[23] and iRGD (CRGDKGPDC)[22] have been utilized in delivering a limited number
of anticancer drugs to tumor sites to increase the effects of anticancer
drugs. To deliver Tα1 more efficiently to tumor tissues, we
designed a new peptide, Tα1-RGDR.[24] RGDR contains an RGD sequence that can bind to integrin αvβ3,
which is overexpressed in many tumor surfaces. Tα1-RGDR also
contains an RGDR sequence, which has a C-terminal R/KXXR/K motif that
can bind with Neuropilin-1 (NRP-1), a cellular receptor expressed
on the surface of tumors and involved in the regulation of tumor vascular
permeability.[24−26] Integrins and neuropilin are major factors in tumor-targeting
peptides.[27] Integrin is one of the main
family members of cell surface receptors, and it mediates the adhesion
of cell and extracellular matrix.[28] αvβ3,
a highly expressed integrin, is involved in tumor angiogenesis, invasion,
and metastasis.[29] Given the high expression
of αvβ3 on tumor surfaces and in endothelial cells during
neovascularization, integrin αvβ3 has been the target
of many antitumor angiogenic drugs.Hence, we bound RGDR to
the C-term of Tα1 by using a GGGG
linker to form a polypeptide, Tα1-RGDR.[24] Ta1-RGDR not only effectively inhibits tumor growth in a mousemelanomatumor model but also greatly enhances mouseimmunodeficiency disease
induced by hydrocortisone.[24] In this study,
we aimed to explore the antitumor activity and tumor-targeting ability
of Tα1-RGDR for lung cancer.
Results
Tα1-RGDR
Inhibited LLC Tumor Growth in Mice in Vivo
The tumor volume
and body weight of mice in each group were measured
daily, and their growth status was observed. After the administration,
tumor-bearing mice were euthanized to obtain tumors, as shown in Figure A. No significant
difference in tumor volume was observed between groups during the
first 3 days of administration. After 4 days of administration, the
tumor volume increased significantly in the PBS group but slowly in
the Tα1-RGDR group, with tumor volume approaching that of the
Tax group (Figure B). Figure A shows
that the median tumor mass in the PBS group was significantly larger
than that in the Tax and Tα1-RGDR groups, and the difference
in tumor weight between the Tα1-RGDR and PBS groups was less
than 0.001 (p = 0.0008) (Figure C). The tumor weight of the Tα1-RGDR
group was lower than that of the Tα1 group, indicating its advantage
in inhibiting the growth of LLC tumor. After 4 days of Tax treatment
on C57BL/6 mice bearing LLC tumors, the body weight of the mice decreased
sharply, the mice were in a state of mental dystrophy, and food intake
was reduced. The mice in the Tα1-RGDR group showed no similar
symptoms (Figure D).
In the LLC tumor model group, after 11 days of administration, the
average tumor volumes in the PBS group, Tα1 group, and Tα1-RGDR
and Tax groups reached 1100, 650, and 520 and 500 mm3,
respectively. After the administration, the tumor volume inhibition
rate induced by Tα1-RGDR was 51.83 ± 5.8% compared with
that of the PBS group, whereas the tumor volume inhibition rate in
the Tα1 group was only 40.5 ± 9.7%. The difference in the
tumor volume inhibition rate between the PBS and Tα1-RGDR groups
was more significant than that of the PBS and Tα1 groups (Figure E). Mice carrying
tumors derived from LLC cells were treated with Tα1-RGDR for
11 days. Blood was then taken from the peripheral area, and IFN-γ
or IL-2 cytokine was measured by ELISA. The levels of IL-2 and IFN-γ
in the Tα1-RGDR group were 154.78 ± 21.70 and 214.76 ±
30.20 ng/L, respectively, whereas those in the Tα1 treatment
group were only 114.62 ± 25.50 and 168.99 ± 30.20 ng/L.
Compared with the Tα1 group, mice bearing LLC after Tα1-RGDR
treatment had significantly increased levels of IL-2 and IFN-γ
(Figure F,G).
Figure 1
Inhibitory
effect of Tα1-RGDR on LLC tumor model. (A) Tumor
mass and entity photo of tumors (n = 9). (B) Tumor
volume changes in different treatment groups (n =
9). LLC cells were injected subcutaneously into the left forelimb
of C57BL/6 mice (5 × 105 cells/mouse). The tumor volume
grew to 80–100 mm3, and the mice were randomly divided
into four groups. Then, 0.1 mL of PBS, 0.31 mg/kg of Tα1-RGDR,
and 0.25 mg/kg Tα1 were continuously injected subcutaneously
every day, whereas 10 mg/kg of paclitaxel (Tax) was injected every
other day. The mice were sacrificed, and the tumors were separated
after the tumor volumes in the negative group reached approximately
1000 mm3. (C) Tumor
weight in different groups (n = 9). (D) Mouse weight
changes in different groups (n = 9). (E) Antitumor
inhibition ratio of tumor mass and volume. (F) Histogram of IL-2 levels
in mouse serum (n = 4). (G) Histogram of IFN-γ
levels in mouse serum (n = 4). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.
Inhibitory
effect of Tα1-RGDR on LLC tumor model. (A) Tumor
mass and entity photo of tumors (n = 9). (B) Tumor
volume changes in different treatment groups (n =
9). LLC cells were injected subcutaneously into the left forelimb
of C57BL/6 mice (5 × 105 cells/mouse). The tumor volume
grew to 80–100 mm3, and the mice were randomly divided
into four groups. Then, 0.1 mL of PBS, 0.31 mg/kg of Tα1-RGDR,
and 0.25 mg/kg Tα1 were continuously injected subcutaneously
every day, whereas 10 mg/kg of paclitaxel (Tax) was injected every
other day. The mice were sacrificed, and the tumors were separated
after the tumor volumes in the negative group reached approximately
1000 mm3. (C) Tumor
weight in different groups (n = 9). (D) Mouse weight
changes in different groups (n = 9). (E) Antitumor
inhibition ratio of tumor mass and volume. (F) Histogram of IL-2 levels
in mouse serum (n = 4). (G) Histogram of IFN-γ
levels in mouse serum (n = 4). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.
Pathological Tissue Section
from LLC Tumor Models
After
11 days of administration, tumor-carrying mice were dissected to obtain
tumors. Histochemistry and immunohistochemistry (IHC) results showed
that the Tα1-RGDR group could promote the infiltration of CD4
and CD8 into tumor tissues. H&E staining of tumor tissues showed
severe necrosis of tumor tissues in the Tα1 and Tα1-RGDR
groups, and the necrosis area was large (Figure ). Compared with those in the Tα1 group,
CD4 + T and CD8 + T in the Tα1-RGDR group greatly infiltrated
into tumor tissues. The IHC of CD31 showed that both Tα1 and
Tα1-RGDR reduced the amount of CD31, but the reduction was not
significant in the Tα1 group (Figure ).
Figure 2
HE staining of LLC tumor sections.
Figure 3
Expression patterns of CD4, CD8, and CD31 in LLC tumor sections.
Immunohistochemical staining of CD4, CD8, and CD31 in lung cancer
tissues. Expression of CD4, CD8, and CD31 in LLC tumor xenograft tissues
following treatment with PBS, Tα1, and Tα1-RGDR. White
arrows represent the positive cytoplasm of CD4, CD8, and CD31 staining
(200× magnification). Brown staining indicates positive CD4,
CD8, and CD31 expression, whereas blue staining indicates cell nuclei.
HE staining of LLC tumor sections.Expression patterns of CD4, CD8, and CD31 in LLC tumor sections.
Immunohistochemical staining of CD4, CD8, and CD31 in lung cancer
tissues. Expression of CD4, CD8, and CD31 in LLC tumor xenograft tissues
following treatment with PBS, Tα1, and Tα1-RGDR. White
arrows represent the positive cytoplasm of CD4, CD8, and CD31 staining
(200× magnification). Brown staining indicates positive CD4,
CD8, and CD31 expression, whereas blue staining indicates cell nuclei.Therefore, Tα1-RGDR had better effects in
promoting the infiltration
of CD4 and CD8 into tumor tissues and downregulating CD31 compared
with Tα1.
Tα1-RGDR Interfered with H460 Growth
in Vivo
Equimolar amount of Tα1 and Tα1-RGDR
(0.081532 μmol/kg)
was administrated in the experiment. Extracted tumors from BALB/c
mice were lined as shown in Figure A. The tumor volume of every seven mice in each group
was measured every day for 11 consecutive days. As time went by, tumors
grew more quickly. The average tumor volume of the PBS group on day
11 reached 904.89 ± 298.99 mm3, whereas those of Tα1,
Tα1-RGDR, and Tax were 198.47, 339.19 (p <
0.05), and 501.91 mm3 (p < 0.01) lower
than that of the PBS group, respectively (Figure B). On the basis of the tumor weight scatter
spot, the tumor size was more ordered and had a lower SD value in
the Tα1-RGDR group (Figure C). After 11 days of administration, the tumors were
dissected and weighed, and a significant difference was observed in
the tumor weight between PBS and Tα1-RGDR (Figure C, p = 0.018).
The tumor weight in the Tα1-RGDR group was lower than that in
the Tα1 group, and the tumor weight difference in the Tax group
was verified, showing superior homogeneity. Therefore, Tα1-RGDR
could better inhibit tumor growth than Tα1.
Figure 4
Inhibitory effect of
Tα1-RGDR on H460 tumor model. (A) Tumor
mass and entity photo of tumors (n = 7). (B) Tumor
volume changes in different treatment groups (n =
7). H460 cells were injected subcutaneously into the left forelimb
of BALB/c nude mice (5 × 105 cells/mouse). The tumor
volume grew to 80–100 mm3, and the mice were randomly
divided into four groups. Then, 0.1 mL of PBS, 0.31 mg/kg of Tα1-RGDR,
and 0.25 mg/kg of Tα1 were continuously injected subcutaneously
every day, whereas 10 mg/kg of paclitaxel (Tax) was injected every
other day. The mice were sacrificed, and the tumors were separated
after the tumor volumes in the negative group reached approximately
1000 mm3. (C) Tumor weight in different groups (n = 7). (D) Mouse weight changes in different groups (n = 7). (E) Antitumor inhibition ratio of tumor mass and
volume.
Inhibitory effect of
Tα1-RGDR on H460 tumor model. (A) Tumor
mass and entity photo of tumors (n = 7). (B) Tumor
volume changes in different treatment groups (n =
7). H460 cells were injected subcutaneously into the left forelimb
of BALB/c nude mice (5 × 105 cells/mouse). The tumor
volume grew to 80–100 mm3, and the mice were randomly
divided into four groups. Then, 0.1 mL of PBS, 0.31 mg/kg of Tα1-RGDR,
and 0.25 mg/kg of Tα1 were continuously injected subcutaneously
every day, whereas 10 mg/kg of paclitaxel (Tax) was injected every
other day. The mice were sacrificed, and the tumors were separated
after the tumor volumes in the negative group reached approximately
1000 mm3. (C) Tumor weight in different groups (n = 7). (D) Mouse weight changes in different groups (n = 7). (E) Antitumor inhibition ratio of tumor mass and
volume.Except for the Tax administration
group, no group showed obvious
abnormal effects, such as loss of body weight (Figure D). The tumor inhibition rate with the average
tumor volume or tumor weight of PBS group as a benchmark was calculated
and is shown in Figure E. The tumor inhibition rates of Tα1-RGDR on tumor volume and
weight were 37.48 and 46.62%, whereas those of Tα1 were 21.9
and 31.5%, respectively. In sum, Tα1-RGDR can inhibit H460 tumor
progression compared with Tα1 without causing obvious side effects.
Pathological Tissue Section from H460 Tumor Models
In pathological
HE slices, the nucleus was stained purple, whereas
the cytoplasm was stained pink. A considerable quantity of cells stained
as purple from the PBS group tumor was close to each other, whereas
the pink area occupied a small part of the whole slice. After Tα1
administration, more pink areas were observed and had much lower quantity
of cells, which have been shrunk. In Tα1-RGDR group slices,
these effects were more robust: the pink area increased, indicating
intensive necrosis (Figure A).
Figure 5
HE and IHC in H460 tumor sections. (A) HE staining of H460 tumor
sections. (B) Immunohistochemical staining of CD4, CD8, and CD31 in
lung cancer tissues. Expression of CD4, CD8, and CD31 in H460 tumor
xenograft tissues following treatment with PBS, Tα1, and Tα1-RGDR.
White arrows represent the positive cytoplasm of CD4, CD8, and CD31
staining (200× magnification). Brown staining indicates positive
CD4, CD8, and CD31 expression, whereas blue staining indicates cell
nuclei.
HE and IHC in H460 tumor sections. (A) HE staining of H460 tumor
sections. (B) Immunohistochemical staining of CD4, CD8, and CD31 in
lung cancer tissues. Expression of CD4, CD8, and CD31 in H460 tumor
xenograft tissues following treatment with PBS, Tα1, and Tα1-RGDR.
White arrows represent the positive cytoplasm of CD4, CD8, and CD31
staining (200× magnification). Brown staining indicates positive
CD4, CD8, and CD31 expression, whereas blue staining indicates cell
nuclei.CD31 antibody was used to locate
the growth of vasculature in tumor.
As shown in Figure , cells that did not express CD31 were stained blue, whereas cells
that expressed CD31 were brown. Brown strips were observed in the
PBS group slices. Tα1 and Tα1-RGDR reduced the amount
of CD31. Strips in Tα1 group were much shorter than those in
the PBS group; however, the quantity was reduced insignificantly.
Compared with Tα1, Tα1-RGDR reduced CD31 expression (Figure B). Hence, Tα1-RGDR
showed a stronger activity in promoting tumor necrosis and downregulating
vasculature than Tα1.
Specific Targeting of Tα1-RGDR in Vivo
BALB/c
nude mice bearing H460 tumor were chosen to investigate the in vivo
distribution of FITC-labeled Tα1-RGDR. After 2 h of internalization
in the mice system, important entities were visualized, as shown in Figure . Tumors from the
Tα1-RGDR group and Tα1 group were in the same scale of
tumor size. The fluorescence intensity of the Tα1-RGDR group
was 2.929e + 08, while the fluorescence intensity of the Tα1
group was only 1.626e + 08. The fluorescence intensity of the Tα1-RGDR
group was 1.8 times that of the Tα1 group, and the fluorescence
covered more than 90% of the tumor area. At the same time, fluorescence
intensity was detected in the lungs of the Tα1-RGDR group mice,
and H460 was detected as a tumor cell derived from human lungs in
the fluorescence intensity of the Tα1 group. In addition, the
fluorescence intensity of the liver in the Tα1-RGDR group was
stronger. These findings indicate that in the H460 lung cancer model,
more Tα1-RGDR is targeted to tumor than Tα1.
Figure 6
Specific targeting
of Tα1-RGDR in vivo. BALB/c nude mice
bearing H460 tumor cells were chosen to investigate the in vivo distribution
of FITC-labeled Tα1-RGDR. The closer the color of fluorescence
is to red, the stronger the fluorescence.
Specific targeting
of Tα1-RGDR in vivo. BALB/c nude mice
bearing H460 tumor cells were chosen to investigate the in vivo distribution
of FITC-labeled Tα1-RGDR. The closer the color of fluorescence
is to red, the stronger the fluorescence.
Discussion
Our laboratory used RGDR bound to the C-terminus
of Tα1 with
GGGG linker between them to form a novel polypeptide, Tα1-RGDR.[24] We found that the tumor volume and tumor weight
were much smaller in the mice treated with Tα1-RGDR than with
Tα1 in LLC and H460 tumor models. Tα1 was originally used
as an immunomodulator for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B.[30−32] Tα1 can enhance the immune response of T cells by increasing
the number of CD4 + T cells and promoting the release of IL-2 and
INF-γ.[33,34] Now, Tα1 has been applied
for the treatment of tumors. The interaction between immunologically
functional cells and immune factors CD4 +/CD8 + T cells can mediate
the tumor survival environment and inhibit the growth of gastric cancer
cells.[6] In hepatocellular carcinoma, CD4
+ T cells mediate cytotoxicity and exert antitumor immunity.[7] Ma et al. also demonstrated that CD4 + T lymphocytes
can produce high levels of reactive oxygen species, which can inhibit
or delay the development of liver cancer.[8] Tα1 can significantly upregulate the production of CD4 + T
and CD8 + T cells,[4,5] and the same results were observed
in our experiments. After the LLC-bearing mice were treated with the
Tα1-RGDR peptide, CD4 + T and CD8 + T cells infiltrated into
cancer cells, and the expression levels of cytokines such as IFN-γ
and IL-2 increased. IFN-γ and IL-2 can promote the activation
of immune cells, and IFN-γ can induce tumor regression.[35,36] Inhibiting tumor angiogenesis is an effective treatment for cancer.[37] CD31 is a member of the immune protein superfamily
expressed in T cells and B cells,[38] and
CD31 is also expressed in many tumor cells.[39,40] Today, CD31 is used to demonstrate the presence of endothelial tissue
and assess tumor angiogenesis and tumor cell invasion.[39,41] Pathological tissue section from H460 tumor models showed that Tα1-RGDR
reduced CD31 expression. These results explain why Tα1-RGDR
is a more promising antitumor drug than Tα1.When used
in combination with other drugs, Tα1 shows significant
therapeutic potential in tumor treatment.[18,19] However, the lack of tumor targeting has limited the application
of Tα1 in the clinical treatment of tumors. In order to exert
the antitumor function of Tα1, our laboratory has designed a
new tumor-targeting peptide, Tα1-RGDR. Our experimental results
shown that Tα1-RGDR has better antitumor activity than Tα1,
and its effect in inhibiting tumor growth is close to that of paclitaxel.
Significant results have been obtained with Tα1-RGDR in the
H460 tumor model for the treatment of lung cancer. Tα1-RGDR
significantly inhibited tumor growth at the same dose as Tα1.
In addition, higher levels of tumor-specific targeting and less angiogenesis
were observed in H460 tumor-bearing mice treated with Tα1-RGDR.
In in vivo fluorescence experiments, Tα1-RGDR was more targeted
to tumor tissue than Tα1. The results of this experiment demonstrated
that RGDR is a key factor that causes Tα1 to target tumors.
Recent studies have provided clues as to how RGDR-modified Tα1
mediates tumor homing. The RGDR sequence contains the RGD sequence,
which can bind to integrin αvβ3 that is overexpressed
in many tumors. Peptides containing RGD can induce tumor cell death
and significantly inhibit tumor growth.[42] NRP-1, a transmembrane glycoprotein, is widely expressed in tumor
tissues and plays a crucial role in tumor angiogenesis.[43] Integrin αvβ3, an integrin protein
closely associated with tumor angiogenesis, specifically recognizes
the RGD sequence.[44] Peptides containing
the RGD sequence interact with integrins by proteolysis to generate
a C-terminal consensus sequence which then binds to highly expressed
NRP-1 on tumor cells, thereby targeting tumor cells.[45] Such as cilengitide [c(-RGDf(NMe)V-)].[46] These pieces of evidence indicate that RGDR is the main
factor leading to the tumor-targeting effect of Tα1. These experimental
results demonstrated the effectiveness of Tα1-RGDR in the treatment
of nonsmall cell lung cancer and also provided new options for cancer
treatment.
Conclusions
LLC and H460 tumor models have proven that
Tα1-RGDR not only
has similar antitumor effects to paclitaxel in the treatment of lung
cancer but also does not have the adverse conditions of weight loss
and mental depression in mice after administration of paclitaxel.
At the same time, Tα1-RGDR is far superior to Tα1 in reducing
systemic toxicity in mice. These results reveal a promising future
for Tα1-RGDR in cancer treatment.
Experimental Procedures
Materials
The humanlung cancer cell line H460 and
mouselung cancer cell line LLC were purchased from the Cell Bank
of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Shanghai, China). Paclitaxel (Tax)
was provided by Yifu Hospital of Nanjing Medical University (Nanjing,
Jiangsu Province, China). C57BL/6 mice and BALB/c nude mice were purchased
from the Comparative Medicine Center of Yangzhou University (Yangzhou,
Jiangsu Province, China). Tα1-RGDR and Tα1 and their FITC-labeled
peptides were synthesized by Apeptide Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China).
Mouse-IFN-γ and mouse-IL-2 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay
(ELISA) kits were purchased from Wuhan Boster Bio-Engineering Co.,
Ltd. (Wuhan, China). Anti-CD4, anti-CD8, and anti-CD31 were purchased
from Abcam Ltd. (Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, China).
LLC Tumor Cell
Implantation and C57BL/6 Mouse Treatment
All animal experiments
complied with the rules and regulations of
Contract 2016(su)-0010 with the approval of Jiangsu Provincial Experimental
Animal Management Committee. LLC tumor cells were cultured in DMEM
containing 10% V/V fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 1% V/V penicillin
and streptomycin. LLC tumor cells (∼5 × 105 cells/mouse) were subcutaneously injected into the left forelimb
of C57BL/6 mice. When the tumor volume reached approximately 80 mm3, the mice were randomly divided into four groups (nine mice/group):
PBS, Tα1, Tα1-RGDR, and Tax. Tumor volume was calculated
as follows: tumor volume = 0.5 × (length × width2). Then, the mice were administered subcutaneously daily with Tax
(10 mg/kg); PBS once daily; and Tα1 and Tα1-RGDR at doses
of 0.25 and 0.308 mg/kg (equimolar amount), respectively, in 0.1 mL
of PBS once daily for 11 days. The length, width of tumors, weight
of mice, and any abnormal conditions were measured daily.
Histochemistry
and IHC
The mice were euthanized at
the end of the experiment. Tumor tissues were collected and fixed
with 4% paraformaldehyde for hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining.
The fixed tumor tissue sections were incubated with 3% H2O2 for 10 min at room temperature, followed by incubation
with primary antibody (CD4, CD8, and CD31) for 12 h at 37 °C.
Finally, an enzyme-labeled secondary antibody (HRP polymer) was added
and incubated for 30 min at room temperature and stained with hematoxylin.
The tumor sections were placed under a microscope to observe the infiltration
of lymphocytes in the tumor.
Determination of Cytokines IFN-γ and
IL-2
C57BL/6
mice in the LLC tumor model group were euthanized when the average
tumor volume in the PBS group reached approximately 1100 mm3. Peripheral blood was first obtained and placed at room temperature
for 30 min. Blood samples were centrifuged for 10 min at 4000 rpm,
and the supernatant was collected, which was then determined using
the mouse IFN-γ or IL-2 kit. IFN-γ or IL-2 standard solution
was prepared at a series of concentrations. Approximately 50 μL
of blood samples was added to 96-well plates coated with anti-IFN-γ
or anti-IL-2 antibodies, incubated at 37 °C for 30 min in a shaker,
and then discarded. The 96-well plate was washed five times with mouse-IFN-γ
or mouse-IL-2 wash solution. Subsequently, enzyme-labeled reagents
were added and incubated at room temperature. The sample was washed
again for five times by using the wash solution. The chromogenic agent
was added to each well and incubated in the dark at 37 °C for
10 min. To stop the reaction, 50 μL of termination fluid (blue
immediately turns yellow) was added to each hole. Finally, the blank
hole was adjusted to zero, and the absorbance of each hole was measured
successively at 450 nm with a microplate reader.
H460 Tumor
Cell Implantation and BALB/c Nude Mouse Treatment
H460 tumor
cells were cultured in RPMI-1640 medium containing 10%
V/V FBS and 1% V/V penicillin and streptomycin. H460 tumor models
were established by injecting 100 μL H460 tumor cell suspension
into the mid-left side of BALB/c nude mice subcutaneously (∼5
× 105 cells/mouse). Groups were divided when the average
tumor volume reached approximately 80–100 mm3. Then,
the mice were subcutaneously administered with Tax (10 mg/kg) every
day; PBS once daily; and Tα1 and Tα1-RGDR at doses of
0.25 and 0.308 mg/kg (equimolar amount), respectively, in 0.1 mL of
PBS once daily for 11 days. The length, width of tumors, weight of
mice, and any abnormal conditions were measured daily.
In Vivo Distribution
of FITC-Labeled Tα1-RGDR and Tα1
After the establishment
of BALB/c nude mouse H460 tumor model,
9 mg/kg of FITC-labeled Tα1-RGDR or Tα1 was then injected
into the tail vein of mice. After 0.5 h, the mice were swabbed with
alcohol to remove excess fluorescence. After 2 h, the mice were euthanized
and dissected to obtain the tumor and their vital organs, such as
the heart, liver, spleen, lung, and kidney, which were revealed under
the IVIS Spectrum in vivo imaging system (PE, American).
Statistical
Analysis
All statistical analyses were
performed using SPSS 25.0 software. Numerical data were presented
as mean ± SEM. Differences among groups were analyzed using one-way
analysis of variance. P < 0.05 was considered
statistically significant (*p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001).
Authors: E Garaci; M Lopez; G Bonsignore; M Della Giulia; M D'Aprile; C Favalli; G Rasi; S Santini; E Capomolla; P Vici Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 1995-12 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: G Rasi; G Silecchia; P Sinibaldi-Vallebona; E Spaziani; P Pierimarchi; M Sivilia; S Tremiterra; E Garaci Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 1994-06-01 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: Joanna J Listopad; Thomas Kammertoens; Kathleen Anders; Bjoern Silkenstedt; Gerald Willimsky; Karin Schmidt; Anja A Kuehl; Christoph Loddenkemper; Thomas Blankenstein Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2013-01-22 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Kazuki N Sugahara; Gary B Braun; Tatiana Hurtado de Mendoza; Venkata Ramana Kotamraju; Randall P French; Andrew M Lowy; Tambet Teesalu; Erkki Ruoslahti Journal: Mol Cancer Ther Date: 2014-11-12 Impact factor: 6.261