Literature DB >> 32426388

Computation screening of narcissoside a glycosyloxyflavone for potential novel coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) inhibitor.

Kushagra Dubey1, Raghvendra Dubey2.   

Abstract

Background: The present study demonstrates the potential of flavanoid narcissoside against the novel corona virus (COVID-19) complications using molecular docking studies.
Methods: The computation molecular docking screening was performed using Molegro Virtual Docker software (MVD) with grid resolution of 30 Å. Protein of COVID 19 virus was taken from protein data bank.
Results: The standard inhibitor X77 (N-(4-tert-butylphenyl)-N-[(1R)-2-(cyclohexylamino)-2-oxo-1-(pyridin-3-yl)ethyl]-1H-imidazole-4-carboxamide) identified from the protein inhibitor complex 6W63 from protein data bank was docked with COVID 19 protein 6W63 which showed MolDock score of -156.913, rerank Sore -121.296 and H Bond -5.7369, while the flavanoid narcissoside had showed MolDock score -180.739, Rerank Sore -137.092 and H Bond -18.6771. The narcissoside showed potent inhibitory effect which is greater than standard X77. The result showed that narcissoside have high affinity towards 6W63 as it showed thirteen hydrogen bonds with nine amino acids (Arg 188, Glu 166, His 164, Cys 145 (2 bonds), Asn 14 (2 bonds), Cys 44 (2 bonds), His 41 (2 bonds), Gln 192, Thr 190) while X777 showed four hydrogen bonds with amino acids (Gly 143, Cys 145, Glu 166, Ser 144).
Conclusion: From computation approach it was concluded that narcissoside is a potent inhibitor of viral COVID 19 protein 6W63. The narcissoside have high affinity and inhibition potential than standard inhibitor X77 (N-(4-tert-butylphenyl)-N-[(1R)-2-(cyclohexylamino)-2-oxo-1-(pyridin-3-yl)ethyl]-1H-imidazole-4-carboxamide). The narcissoside predicted as more potent inhibitor which can be further optimize, pharmacologically and clinically evaluated for the treatment of novel coronavirus COVID-19.
© 2020 Chang Gung University. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  6W63; COVID-19; Flavonoid; MVD; Molecular docking; X77

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32426388      PMCID: PMC7233213          DOI: 10.1016/j.bj.2020.05.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomed J        ISSN: 2319-4170            Impact factor:   4.910


At a glance of commentary

Scientific background on the subject

The need of an hour to develop the potent inhibitor of novel coronavirus (COVID-19) causing pandemic respiratory syndrome has brought the dry laboratories to work out on existing and novel medicine for their potential against the deadly virus.

What this study adds to the field

The narcissoside, a glycosyloxyflavone had showed potent inhibitory potential against coronavirus protein 6W63 which observed to more than the reported inhibitor X77. The potent molecule can be further be evaluated for preclinical and clinical studies and can be formulated in suitable dosage form for maximum bioavailability. An ongoing outbreak of respiratory syndrome caused by a novel coronavirus called as COVID-19 which was reported in Wuhan, China in December 2019 [[1], [2], [3]].In the following months the infection was spread across the world and is becoming an important causative agent for the fatal disease [[4], [5], [6], [7]]. It is a great global public health concern and extensive measures are taken to reduce transmission of COVID-19 to control the current outbreak. With the emergence of new virus strains, there is a need for the development of the novel and effective antiviral for the treatment of COVID-19. In the present work, an attempt was made using computational approach to identify the potential flavones inhibitors narcissoside that binds to coronavirus for the treatment of COVID-19. Despite of various system of medicine available for the treatment, the recent curiosity is particularly in medicinal plants which have been important sources of new drugs, leads, and new chemical entities [[8], [9], [10], [11]]. Molecular modeling and structure-based drug design has been a promising technique to discover novel inhibitors and has become a famous practice in modern drug discovery. Until the computational drug discovery was adopted, the drugs were identified by chance in a manner of trial and error. Computer-aided drug design helps to facilitate and speed up the drug designing process, which involves a variety of methods to identify novel compounds. Flavonoids are the natural substance widely distributed in grains, fruits, vegetables, leaves, barks, stems, roots and flowers. With more than 4000 variable phenolic structures, flavonoids have been discovered from plant species. Flavonoids are more investigated and are interesting compounds and almost many of them are of pharmacological importance. It has been demonstrated through numerous scientific studies that the flavonoids have antibacterial, anti-angiogenesis, anti-inflammatory, antiviral, antiatherosclerotic, antitumor, anti-thrombogenic, and antifungal activity [12,13]. The narcissoside, also known as narcissin is an Isorhamnetin-3-O-rutinoside flavonoid that belongs to monomethoxyflavone derivative and has been isolated from number of medicinal plants some are wild plant Peucedanum aucheri Boiss [14], leaves of Manihot escylenta Crantz (Cassava leaves) [15], Shoots of Caragana spinosa [16], flowers of Flos Sophorae Immaturus [17], plants of Nitaria Genus [18], leaves of Gynura divaricata [19], and aerial parts of Atriplex halimus L [20].

Material and methods

Molecular docking

Preparation of ligand

The COVID-19 inhibitor N-(4-tert-butylphenyl)-N-[(1R)-2-(cyclohexylamino)-2-oxo-1-(pyridin-3-yl)ethyl]-1H-imidazole-4-carboxamide reported as inhibitor in binding state with the protein 6w63 in protein data bank and 3-O-Methylquercetin 3-rutinoside (Fig. 1) were identified from PubChem chemical database. The structures were drawn using Chem3D and energy minimization using the MM2 force field and saved in.mol format. The missing bond orders, charges, bonds, and hybridization states of the structures were assigned using MVD software [21].
Fig. 1

Chemical structure of standard X77(A) and narcissoside (B).

Chemical structure of standard X77(A) and narcissoside (B).

Preparation of protein

The 3D structure of the viral protein was retrieved from the Protein Data Bank (PDB ID: 6W63) and the proteins were prepared by removal of all water molecules, ligand, cofactors and assigning bonds, bond order, hybridization, and charges using MVD software [21].

Docking search algorithms and scoring functions

Piecewise Linear Potential (PLP) algorithm is used for scoring function in the computation screening. MolDock simplex evolution search algorithm with grid resolution 30 Å was used to carried out docking process [22]. The cavity were predicted and restricted to three using cavity prediction wizard, the cavity with the large volume was selected as the origin for the binding site. The ligands were docked with viral protein and best-generated poses were selected based on the docking scores [23].

Parameters for scoring functions

The energies are calculated in two scoring function Moldock Score and Rerank Score.

MolDock score

E score which is a docking scoring function, defined by the following energy terms:E score = E inter + E intraWhere E inter is the sum of ligand–protein interaction energy, ligand–water interaction energy and ligand–cofactor interaction energy while E intra is the internal energy of the ligand [24]. The E intra energy includes sum of interactions energies of electronic, H bond, clash, sp2-sp2 hybridization, steric, torsal, torsal (ligand atoms), vanderwaal, soft constraint penalty and E-solvation.

Re rank score

In MVD, the rerank score provides an estimation of the interaction strength.This is not measured in chemical units and does not require complex contributions [24].

Results

The results reported in Table 1, Table 2 and Fig. 2 clearly indicated that Narcissoside fits perfectly at the active site of Protein 6W63, a novel corona virus COVID-19.
Table 1

The Docking Score of Standard X77 and Narcissoside with corona virus protein 6W63 (COVID -19).

S.No.LigandProteinInteraction Score
MolDockRerankH Bond
1Standard X776W63−156.913−121.296−5.7369
2Narcissoside6W63−180.739−137.092−18.6771
Table 2

The Total Interaction energy of Standard X77 and Narcissoside with corona virus protein 6W63 COVID -19.

S.No.Target Atoms: MoleculeResidueIDTotal Energy of Interaction
Standard X77Narcissoside
16W63 [A]Arg188−7.66744−10.9985
26W63 [A]Asn142−15.5609−19.9549
36W63 [A]Asp187−5.02839−2.15432
46W63 [A]Cys44−0.895733−1.73084
56W63 [A]Cys145−10.3877−5.53185
66W63 [A]Gln189−9.77781−12.3962
76W63 [A]Gln192−0.400777−7.60682
86W63 [A]Glu166−23.2155−21.4249
96W63 [A]Gly143−7.30909−2.03337
106W63 [A]His41−23.5486−25.5306
116W63 [A]His163−2.50682−0.714996
126W63 [A]His164−4.38194−6.59603
136W63 [A]His172−1.35267NA
146W63 [A]Leu27−3.6484NA
156W63 [A]Leu141−7.1357−3.79481
166W63 [A]Leu167NA−5.21798
176W63 [A]Met49−4.62123−14.7328
186W63 [A]Met165−20.9047−23.4037
196W63 [A]Phe140−5.14266−0.782012
206W63 [A]Pro52NA−0.357936
216W63 [A]Pro168NA−2.51004
226W63 [A]Ser144−6.14224−1.10625
236W63 [A]Thr25−0.777035−0.430475
246W63 [A]Thr26−1.97101NA
256W63 [A]Thr190−0.547215−6.94543
266W63 [A]Tyr54−1.20212−0.778733
276W63 [A]Val186−0.313283−0.87103
Fig. 2

Interaction of Standard X77(A) and Narcissoside (B) with active cavity of corona virus protein 6W63 COVID -19.

The Docking Score of Standard X77 and Narcissoside with corona virus protein 6W63 (COVID -19). The Total Interaction energy of Standard X77 and Narcissoside with corona virus protein 6W63 COVID -19. Interaction of Standard X77(A) and Narcissoside (B) with active cavity of corona virus protein 6W63 COVID -19. It involves complex interaction with 24 active interaction sites of protein CWC6 which were Arg 188, Asn 142, Asp 187, Cys 44, Cys 145, Gln 189, Gln 192, Glu 166, Gly 143, His 41, His 163,His 164, Leu 141, Leu 167, Met49, Met 185, Phe 140, Pro 52, Pro 168, Ser 144, Tr 25, Thr 190, Tyr 54, Val 186. The Narcissoside showed same complex interaction as showed by the standard inhibitor N-(4-tert-butylphenyl)-N-[(1R)-2-(cyclohexylamino)-2-oxo-1-(pyridin-3-yl)ethyl]-1H-imidazole-4-carboxamide(X77) in binding state with the protein 6w63 which were Arg 188, Asn 142, Asp 187, Cys 44, Cys 145, Gln 189, Gln 192, Glu 166, Gly 143, His 41, His 163,His 164, His 172, Leu 27, Leu 141, Met49, Met 185, Phe 140, Ser 144, Thr 25, Thr 26, Thr 190, Tyr 54, Val 186. However three amino acid interactions were changed in both the inhibitors. It was observed that Narcissoside interacted with Leu 167, Pro 52 and Pro 168 while X77 interacted with His 172, Leu 27 and Thr 26. The Docking score indicated that the standard X77 showed MolDock score of −156.913, rerank Sore −121.296 and H Bond −5.7369, while the flavanoid narcissoside had showed MolDock score −180.739, Rerank Sore −137.092 and H Bond −18.6771. The narcissoside showed potent inhibitory effect which is greater than standard X77.

Discussion

In Jan 2020, 25 fatalcases of 2019-nCoV infections were reported in China. The number of deaths in the world is rising quickly. Reports of exported cases have been released in several parts in China and other countries.transmission dynamics and the full spectrum of clinical illness are not yet fully understood. Severe pneumonia, respiratory failure, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), and cardiac injury, including fatal outcomes are the complications of COVID 19. Many of the patients were infected by exposure to the environment and transmission from person to person. Our present study is aimed to find out the potent inhibitor from natural origin against this corona virus. In our study both the inhibitors has bound the active cavity of protein and showed significant binding with amino acids. The binding energies of Narcissoside with amino acid (Asn 142 (−19.955), Glu 166 (−21.425), His 41 (−25.531) & Met 165 (−23.04)) were compared with the binding energy of standard X77 with amino acids (Asn 142 (−15.561), Glu 166 (−23.216), His 41 (−23.549) & Met 165 (−20.905)).The result showed that the Narcissoside required least energy to bind with the protein. The interaction showed that Narcissoside showed high affinity then the standard X77 as Narcissoside showed thirteen hydrogen bonds with nine amino acids (Arg 188, Glu 166, His 164, Cys 145 (2 bonds), Asn 14 (2 bonds), Cys 44 (2 bonds), His 41 (2 bonds), Gln 192, Thr 190) while X77 showed four hydrogen bonds with amino acids (Gly 143, Cys 145, Glu 166, Ser 144) showed in Fig. 2. It was also observed that the andrews affinity i.e. function group contribution to drug receptor interaction, for the narcissoside is 24.6248 which is 2.5 times more than standard X77 (i.e. 9.161).

Conclusion

The outbreak of the pandemic respiratory syndrome caused by a novel coronavirus (COVID-19) requires the attention of global researcher to discover the possible safe and effective medicine to cure the same. In the present work the standard inhibitor X77 and Narcissoside were docked with the protein of novel corona virus COVID-19 6W63. It was observed that the affinity of the Narcissoside was more as compare to standard X77. Narcissoside get fits perfectly at the active site of the 6W63 and showed thirteen hydrogen bonds with nine amino acids in the cavity, while the standard X77 showed only four hydrogen bonds with amino acids. Further research can be performed to identify the safety and efficacy parameters at both preclinical and clinical stages to evaluate the effectiveness of Narcissoside for the treatment of novel coronavirus COVID-19.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
  13 in total

Review 1.  Plants as source of drugs.

Authors:  S M Rates
Journal:  Toxicon       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 3.033

2.  Combinatorial chemistry in drug discovery.

Authors:  J C Hogan
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 54.908

3.  Extraction and isolation of flavonoid glycosides from Flos Sophorae Immaturus using ultrasonic-assisted extraction followed by high-speed countercurrent chromatography.

Authors:  Zhisheng Xie; Yongjiang Sun; Shingchung Lam; Mingqian Zhao; Zhikun Liang; Xiaoxue Yu; Depo Yang; Xinjun Xu
Journal:  J Sep Sci       Date:  2014-03-10       Impact factor: 3.645

4.  Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China.

Authors:  Chaolin Huang; Yeming Wang; Xingwang Li; Lili Ren; Jianping Zhao; Yi Hu; Li Zhang; Guohui Fan; Jiuyang Xu; Xiaoying Gu; Zhenshun Cheng; Ting Yu; Jiaan Xia; Yuan Wei; Wenjuan Wu; Xuelei Xie; Wen Yin; Hui Li; Min Liu; Yan Xiao; Hong Gao; Li Guo; Jungang Xie; Guangfa Wang; Rongmeng Jiang; Zhancheng Gao; Qi Jin; Jianwei Wang; Bin Cao
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  The first two cases of 2019-nCoV in Italy: Where they come from?

Authors:  Marta Giovanetti; Domenico Benvenuto; Silvia Angeletti; Massimo Ciccozzi
Journal:  J Med Virol       Date:  2020-02-12       Impact factor: 2.327

6.  Early Transmission Dynamics in Wuhan, China, of Novel Coronavirus-Infected Pneumonia.

Authors:  Qun Li; Xuhua Guan; Peng Wu; Xiaoye Wang; Lei Zhou; Yeqing Tong; Ruiqi Ren; Kathy S M Leung; Eric H Y Lau; Jessica Y Wong; Xuesen Xing; Nijuan Xiang; Yang Wu; Chao Li; Qi Chen; Dan Li; Tian Liu; Jing Zhao; Man Liu; Wenxiao Tu; Chuding Chen; Lianmei Jin; Rui Yang; Qi Wang; Suhua Zhou; Rui Wang; Hui Liu; Yinbo Luo; Yuan Liu; Ge Shao; Huan Li; Zhongfa Tao; Yang Yang; Zhiqiang Deng; Boxi Liu; Zhitao Ma; Yanping Zhang; Guoqing Shi; Tommy T Y Lam; Joseph T Wu; George F Gao; Benjamin J Cowling; Bo Yang; Gabriel M Leung; Zijian Feng
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2020-01-29       Impact factor: 176.079

7.  Importation and Human-to-Human Transmission of a Novel Coronavirus in Vietnam.

Authors:  Lan T Phan; Thuong V Nguyen; Quang C Luong; Thinh V Nguyen; Hieu T Nguyen; Hung Q Le; Thuc T Nguyen; Thang M Cao; Quang D Pham
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2020-01-28       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  First Case of 2019 Novel Coronavirus in the United States.

Authors:  Michelle L Holshue; Chas DeBolt; Scott Lindquist; Kathy H Lofy; John Wiesman; Hollianne Bruce; Christopher Spitters; Keith Ericson; Sara Wilkerson; Ahmet Tural; George Diaz; Amanda Cohn; LeAnne Fox; Anita Patel; Susan I Gerber; Lindsay Kim; Suxiang Tong; Xiaoyan Lu; Steve Lindstrom; Mark A Pallansch; William C Weldon; Holly M Biggs; Timothy M Uyeki; Satish K Pillai
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2020-01-31       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 9.  Flavonoids and Other Phenolic Compounds from Medicinal Plants for Pharmaceutical and Medical Aspects: An Overview.

Authors:  Duangjai Tungmunnithum; Areeya Thongboonyou; Apinan Pholboon; Aujana Yangsabai
Journal:  Medicines (Basel)       Date:  2018-08-25

10.  A Novel Coronavirus from Patients with Pneumonia in China, 2019.

Authors:  Na Zhu; Dingyu Zhang; Wenling Wang; Xingwang Li; Bo Yang; Jingdong Song; Xiang Zhao; Baoying Huang; Weifeng Shi; Roujian Lu; Peihua Niu; Faxian Zhan; Xuejun Ma; Dayan Wang; Wenbo Xu; Guizhen Wu; George F Gao; Wenjie Tan
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  9 in total

1.  Khaya grandifoliola active fraction as a source of therapeutic compounds for Alzheimer's disease treatment: In silico validation of identified compounds.

Authors:  Brice Ayissi Owona; Frederic N Njayou; Pierre Mkounga; Paul F Moundipa
Journal:  In Silico Pharmacol       Date:  2022-07-04

2.  Expeditious responses to COVID-19 crisis: From governmental management to laboratory approach.

Authors:  Huey-Kang Sytwu
Journal:  Biomed J       Date:  2020-09-19       Impact factor: 4.910

Review 3.  Natural Products for the Prevention and Control of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Sustainable Bioresources.

Authors:  Rajeev K Singla; Xuefei He; Hitesh Chopra; Christos Tsagkaris; Li Shen; Mohammad Amjad Kamal; Bairong Shen
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 5.810

4.  An integrated method for optimized identification of effective natural inhibitors against SARS-CoV-2 3CLpro.

Authors:  Qi Liao; Ziyu Chen; Yanlin Tao; Beibei Zhang; Xiaojun Wu; Li Yang; Qingzhong Wang; Zhengtao Wang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-11-23       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  A potent virucidal activity of functionalized TiO2 nanoparticles adsorbed with flavonoids against SARS-CoV-2.

Authors:  Gabriela León-Gutiérrez; James Edward Elste; Carlos Cabello-Gutiérrez; Cesar Millán-Pacheco; Mario H Martínez-Gómez; Rafael Mejía-Alvarez; Vaibhav Tiwari; Armando Mejía
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2022-08-11       Impact factor: 5.560

Review 6.  Therapeutic Potential of Glycosyl Flavonoids as Anti-Coronaviral Agents.

Authors:  Patrícia I C Godinho; Raquel G Soengas; Vera L M Silva
Journal:  Pharmaceuticals (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-07

Review 7.  A Brief Overview of Potential Treatments for Viral Diseases Using Natural Plant Compounds: The Case of SARS-Cov.

Authors:  Rambod Abiri; Hazandy Abdul-Hamid; Oksana Sytar; Ramin Abiri; Eduardo Bezerra de Almeida; Surender K Sharma; Victor P Bulgakov; Randolph R J Arroo; Sonia Malik
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 4.411

8.  Pandemic number five - Latest insights into the COVID-19 crisis.

Authors:  Sophia Julia Häfner
Journal:  Biomed J       Date:  2020-08-27       Impact factor: 4.910

9.  Don't sugar coat the COVID (only the vasculature).

Authors:  Sophia Julia Häfner
Journal:  Biomed J       Date:  2020-10-10       Impact factor: 4.910

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.