| Literature DB >> 32425887 |
Mateus C Barros-Filho1, Julia B H de Mello1, Fabio A Marchi1, Clóvis A L Pinto2, Igor C da Silva3, Patricia K F Damasceno4, Milena B P Soares4,5, Luiz P Kowalski6, Silvia R Rogatto7.
Abstract
Currently, there is a lack of efficient recurrence prediction methods for papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC). In this study, we enrolled 202 PTC patients submitted to total thyroidectomy and radioiodine therapy with long-term follow-up (median = 10.7 years). The patients were classified as having favorable clinical outcome (PTC-FCO, no disease in the follow-up) or recurrence (PTC-RE). Alterations in BRAF, RAS, RET, and TERT were investigated (n = 202) and the transcriptome of 48 PTC (>10 years of follow-up) samples was profiled. Although no mutation was associated with the recurrence risk, 68 genes were found as differentially expressed in PTC-RE compared to PTC-FCO. Pathway analysis highlighted a potential role of cancer-related pathways, including signal transduction and FoxO signaling. Among the eight selected genes evaluated by RT-qPCR, SLC2A4 and GADD45B showed down-expression exclusively in the PTC-FCO group compared to non-neoplastic tissues (NT). Increased expression of GADD45B was an independent marker of shorter disease-free survival [hazard ratio (HR) 2.9; 95% confidence interval (CI95) 1.2-7.0] in our cohort and with overall survival in the TCGA dataset (HR = 4.38, CI95 1.2-15.5). In conclusion, GADD45B transcript was identified as a novel prognostic marker candidate in PTC patients treated with total thyroidectomy and radioiodine therapy.Entities:
Keywords: BRAF mutation; GADD45B; TERT promoter mutation; papillary thyroid cancer; prognostic markers; transcription profiling
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32425887 PMCID: PMC7203742 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2020.00269
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) ISSN: 1664-2392 Impact factor: 5.555
Clinical-pathological characteristics according to the status of BRAF, RAS, and TERT mutations and RET rearrangements in papillary thyroid carcinomas.
| <55 years | 106/175 (61) | 0.206 | 5/171 (3) | 1.000 | 1/167 (1) | 16/150 (11) | 0.132 | |
| ≥55 years | 20/27 (74) | 0/27 (0) | 4/26 (15) | 0/24 (0) | ||||
| Female | 95/155 (61) | 0.609 | 3/152 (2) | 0.330 | 4/149 (3) | 1.000 | 11/135 (8) | 0.359 |
| Male | 31/47 (66) | 2/46 (4) | 1/44 (2) | 5/39 (13) | ||||
| ≤1 cm | 58/91 (64) | 0.771 | 2/89 (2) | 1.000 | 0/85 (0) | 0.068 | 6/78 (8) | 0.606 |
| >1 cm | 68/111 (61) | 3/109 (3) | 5/108 (5) | 10/96 (10) | ||||
| No | 67/113 (59) | 0.464 | 3/112 (3) | 1.000 | 3/107 (3) | 1.000 | 10/97 (10) | 0.793 |
| Yes | 55/85 (65) | 2/82 (2) | 2/82 (2) | 6/73 (8) | ||||
| Classical | 103/150 (69) | 0.007 | 0/147 (0) | 3/142 (2) | 0.571 | 12/132 (9) | 0.090 | |
| Follicular | 16/37 (43) | 4/36 (11) | 1/36 (3) | 1/30 (3) | ||||
| Other | 7/15 (47) | 1/15 (7) | 1/15 (7) | 3/12 (25) | ||||
| No | 112/179 (63) | 0.804 | 5/175 (3) | 1.000 | 3/170 (2) | 0.080 | 12/156 (8) | 0.130 |
| Yes | 11/19 (58) | 0/19 (0) | 2/19 (11) | 3/15 (20) | ||||
| No | 64/116 (55) | 0.025 | 5/112 (4) | 0.077 | 1/113 (1) | 0.081 | 9/101 (9) | 0.795 |
| Yes | 57/80 (71) | 0/80 (0) | 4/74 (5) | 7/69 (10) | ||||
| cN0, pN0 | 83/134 (62) | 0.879 | 5/133 (4) | 0.174 | 4/127 (3) | 0.662 | 5/119 (4) | |
| pN1 | 43/68 (63) | 0/65 (0) | 1/66 (2) | 11/55 (20) | ||||
| No | 105/169 (62) | 1.000 | 5/167 (3) | 1.000 | 4/161 (2) | 1.000 | 14/152 (9) | 1.000 |
| Yes | 21/33 (64) | 0/31 (0) | 1/32 (3) | 2/22 (9) | ||||
N, number of samples tested; ETE, extrathyroidal extension; P-value, Fisher exact test; in bold, statistically significant after Bonferroni correction (P = 0.05 divided by nine variables = P < 0.0056).
tall cells, solid, oncocytic, sclerosing and mucosecretory histological variants.
Vascular and/or perineural invasions.
Locoregional recurrence (N = 29) and distant metastases (N = 4, all in the lung).
Figure 1Supervised hierarchical clustering analysis comprising 61 genes differentially expressed in primary PTC-RE compared to PTC-FCO (samples in columns and genes in rows). Two major groups are shown: the first (gray) is enriched by patients with favorable clinical outcomes and the second (black) by patients who relapsed in the follow-up.
Biological pathways potentially altered in PTC from relapsed patients using KOBAS 3.0 and PathDip tools.
| Signal transduction (Reactome) | <0.001 | 0.001 | <0.001 | 0.024 | |
| Platelet activation, signaling and aggregation (Reactome) | <0.001 | 0.001 | <0.001 | 0.019 | |
| FoxO signaling pathway (KEGG) | <0.001 | 0.003 | <0.001 | 0.023 | |
| Peptide ligand-binding receptors (Reactome) | 0.004 | 0.049 | <0.001 | 0.023 | |
P-value from hypergeometric test; False Discovery Rate (FDR) estimated by Benjamini-Hochberg method.
Figure 2Expression levels of eight genes evaluated by RT-qPCR (TLDA custom assay) in PTC samples previously investigated by microarray analysis (yellow dots) and in an array-independent set of samples (blue dots). GADD45B showed statistically significant higher expression levels in PTC-RE compared to PTC-FCO cases. FCO, favorable clinical outcome; RE, recurrence; ***P < 0.001; **P < 0.01; *P < 0.05; NS, not significant (Tukey post-hoc test).
Figure 3Survival analysis performed according to the GADD45B expression levels. (A) Kaplan–Meier plot demonstrating shorter disease-free survival in patients presenting higher GADD45B expression levels (above median) evaluated by RT-qPCR. (B) Kaplan–Meier plot showing a shorter overall survival in cases presenting higher GADD45B expression in PTC patients from the TCGA database (RNA sequencing). P-values were obtained by Cox proportional-hazards regression, and median expression was used as a cut-off.
Univariate and multivariate analysis, contrasting the risk of relapse of PTC patients with clinical, pathological and molecular features.
| <55 years | 1.0 | |||
| ≥55 years | 0.6 (0.2–2.1) | 0.476 | ||
| Female | 1.0 | 1.0 | ||
| Male | 2.3 (1.1–4.6) | 1.6 (0.7–3.4) | 0.241 | |
| ≤1 cm | 1.0 | |||
| >1 cm | 2.0 (1.0–5.0) | 0.062 | ||
| No | 1.0 | |||
| Yes | 2.0 (1.0–4.0) | 0.062 | ||
| Classical | 1.0 | |||
| Other | 2.0 (0.8–5.2) | 0.148 | ||
| No | 1.0 | 1.0 | ||
| Yes | 3.2 (1.4–7.4) | 1.8 (0.6–4.9) | 0.271 | |
| No | 1.0 | |||
| Yes | 1.8 (0.9–3.7) | 0.091 | ||
| No | 1.0 | 1.0 | ||
| Yes | 4.1 (2.0–8.4) | 3.0 (1.3–6.9) | ||
| No | 1.0 | |||
| Yes | 1.1 (0.5–2.2) | 0.867 | ||
| No | 1.0 | |||
| Yes | 0 (0–848.7) | 0.542 | ||
| No | 1.0 | |||
| Yes | 1.0 (0.2–4.4) | 0.972 | ||
| No | 1.0 | |||
| Yes | 1.4 (0.2–10.4) | 0.728 | ||
| Bellow median | 1.0 | 1.0 | ||
| Above median | 3.6 (1.5–8.4) | 2.9 (1.2–7.0) | ||
HR, Hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval. P-value, Cox proportional-hazards regression. The bold values are statistically significant.