| Literature DB >> 32425823 |
Hussien Elkholy1, Mahmoud Elhabiby1, Islam Ibrahim1.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Alexithymia is characterized by difficulties in describing feelings. Many studies have shown that there is a relation between alexithymia and different types of addictions. Nowadays, smartphone addiction is proposed to be a global problem. The current study focuses on the rates of alexithymia and its association with smartphone addiction in an Egyptian university.Entities:
Keywords: Smartphone Addiction Scale–Short Version (SAS-SV); Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS); alexithymia; behavioral addiction; smartphone addiction; university students
Year: 2020 PMID: 32425823 PMCID: PMC7212412 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00304
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Psychiatry ISSN: 1664-0640 Impact factor: 4.157
Comparing rates of smartphone addiction and alexithymia according to sex and type of faculty.
| Sex | Chi square test | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Female | Male | ||||||||||||||||||||
| N | % | N | % | p value | sig. | ||||||||||||||||
| Smartphone Addiction | Negative | 72 | 62.6% | 63 | 74.1% | 0.086 | NS | ||||||||||||||
| Positive | 43 | 37.4% | 22 | 25.9% | |||||||||||||||||
| Alexithymia | No Alexithymia | 90 | 78.3% | 66 | 77.6% | 0.917 | NS | ||||||||||||||
| Alexithymia | 25 | 21.7% | 19 | 22.4% | |||||||||||||||||
| Smartphone Addiction | Negative | 58 | 69.0% | 77 | 66.4% | 0.691 | NS | ||||||||||||||
| Positive | 26 | 31.0% | 39 | 33.6% | |||||||||||||||||
| Alexithymia | No Alexithymia | 68 | 81.0% | 88 | 75.9% | 0.391 | NS | ||||||||||||||
| Alexithymia | 16 | 19.0% | 28 | 24.1% | |||||||||||||||||
| Smartphone Addiction | Negative | 17 | 81.0% | 27 | 71.1% | 32 | 66.7% | 44 | 61.1% | 12 | 70.6% | 3 | 75.0% | 0.626 | NS | ||||||
| Positive | 4 | 19.0% | 11 | 28.9% | 16 | 33.3% | 28 | 38.9% | 5 | 29.4% | 1 | 25.0% | |||||||||
| Alexithymia | No Alexithymia | 15 | 71.4% | 33 | 86.8% | 36 | 75.0% | 54 | 75.0% | 14 | 82.4% | 4 | 100% | 0.520 | NS | ||||||
| Alexithymia | 6 | 28.6% | 5 | 13.2% | 12 | 25.0% | 18 | 25.0% | 3 | 17.6% | 0 | 0.0% | |||||||||
SAS-SV, Smartphone Addiction Scale–Short Version; TAS, Toronto Alexithymia Scale.
Relation between scores of SAS-SV and TAS and different factors.
| Sex | T Test | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Females | Males | P value | Sig. | |||||||
| SAS-SV | Mean ± SD | 31.504 ± 11.716 | 26.871 ± 9.723 | 0.003 | S | |||||
| TAS | Mean ± SD | 55.948 ± 14.063 | 56.565 ± 18.694 | 0.790 | NS | |||||
| SAS-SV | Mean ± SD | 28.560 ± 11.555 | 30.241 ± 10.802 | 0.293 | NS | |||||
| TAS | Mean ± SD | 56.560 ± 17.831 | 55.957 ± 14.894 | 0.795 | NS | |||||
| SAS-SV | Mean ± SD | 23.381 ± 8.891 | 29.632 ± 12.314 | 29.042 ± 10.244 | 31.361 ± 11.493 | 30.529 ± 9.049 | 29.750 ± 15.945 | 0.125 | NS | |
| TAS | Mean ± SD | 61.048 ± 30.556 | 54.316 ± 11.414 | 55.292 ± 14.265 | 56.667 ± 14.900 | 55.059 ± 12.060 | 56.500 ± 4.726 | 0.750 | NS | |
SAS-SV, Smartphone Addiction Scale–Short Version; TAS, Toronto Alexithymia Scale.
Relation between alexithymia and smartphone addiction.
| Smartphone addiction | OR (95% CI) | P value | Sig. | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Negative | Positive | ||||||
| Alexithymia | No alexithymia | N | 117 | 39 | 4.33 | <0.001 | S |
| % of TAS | 75.0% | 25.0% | |||||
| % of SAS | 86.7% | 60.0% | |||||
| Alexithymia | N | 18 | 26 | ||||
| % of TAS | 40.9% | 59.1% | |||||
| % of SAS | 13.3% | 40.0% | |||||
SAS-SV, Smartphone Addiction Scale–Short Version; TAS, Toronto Alexithymia Scale.
Logistic regression analysis for predictors of smartphone addiction.
| Dependent SAS-SV | OR | 95% C.I. for OR | p value | Sig. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex (ref. Male) | 1.85 | 0.96–3.58 | 0.067 | NS |
| Faculty (ref. Theoretical) | 1.04 | 0.55–1.99 | 0.898 | NS |
| Age | 1.11 | 0.95–1.3 | 0.197 | NS |
| TAS (ref. negative) | 4.72 | 2.29–9.73 | <0.001 | S |
SAS-SV, Smartphone Addiction Scale–Short Version; TAS, Toronto Alexithymia Scale.