Yingchao Hu1, Lejia Sun2, Yinglan Zhang3, Jinghe Lang1, Jun Rao4. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, People's Republic of China. 2. Department of Liver Surgery, Peking Union Medical College (PUMC) Hospital, PUMC & Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100730, People's Republic of China. 3. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Affiliated Beijing Chaoyang Hospital of Capital Medical University, Beijing 100020, People's Republic of China. 4. Jiangxi Provincial Key Laboratory of Translational Medicine and Oncology, Jiangxi Cancer Hospital, Jiangxi Cancer Center, Nanchang 330029, People's Republic of China.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Ovarian cancer (OC) is the seventh most common cancer worldwide for women. However, there are no sufficient diagnostic methods and few treatment options available due to poor understanding of its pathogenic mechanisms. METHODS: To comprehensively analyze the phosphoproteomic characterization for OC, we took advantage of a quantitative global phosphoproteomics method, titanium(IV) immobilized metal affinity chromatography (Ti4+-IMAC) coupled to nanoscale liquid chromatography and quadrupole time-of-flight tandem mass spectrometry (nanoLC/Q-TOF-MS/MS) on ovarian tissue samples obtained from five OC patients and five matched controls. RESULTS: A total of 722 phosphorylated sites corresponding to 534 proteins were significantly different (fold change ≥ 2, p < 0.01) between OC patients and the controls. Among them, 83 transcription factors mainly consisted of transcription cofactors, zf-C2H2, and chromatin remodeling factors and 29 kinases were included. Further functional analysis suggested significantly biological processes were highly enriched and involved in the pathogenesis of OC, especially fructose and mannose metabolism. Moreover, the regulatory roles of modulated pathways, including MAPK, ErbB, and GnRH signaling pathways were also identified as critical processes involved in OC. The results here highlighted key phosphorylated proteins, particularly kinases, and the corresponding cancer-related metabolic and signal pathways that played important roles in the development of OC. Additionally, the expression levels of two kinases, phosphorylated CDK (T14) and phosphorylated PRKCQ (S695), were validated by Western blot analysis in the other group of ovarian tissue samples. CONCLUSION: Altogether, our data not only provided novel insights into the potential biomarkers and therapy options for OC but also extended our knowledge on its pathophysiological mechanism.
BACKGROUND: Ovarian cancer (OC) is the seventh most common cancer worldwide for women. However, there are no sufficient diagnostic methods and few treatment options available due to poor understanding of its pathogenic mechanisms. METHODS: To comprehensively analyze the phosphoproteomic characterization for OC, we took advantage of a quantitative global phosphoproteomics method, titanium(IV) immobilized metal affinity chromatography (Ti4+-IMAC) coupled to nanoscale liquid chromatography and quadrupole time-of-flight tandem mass spectrometry (nanoLC/Q-TOF-MS/MS) on ovarian tissue samples obtained from five OC patients and five matched controls. RESULTS: A total of 722 phosphorylated sites corresponding to 534 proteins were significantly different (fold change ≥ 2, p < 0.01) between OC patients and the controls. Among them, 83 transcription factors mainly consisted of transcription cofactors, zf-C2H2, and chromatin remodeling factors and 29 kinases were included. Further functional analysis suggested significantly biological processes were highly enriched and involved in the pathogenesis of OC, especially fructose and mannose metabolism. Moreover, the regulatory roles of modulated pathways, including MAPK, ErbB, and GnRH signaling pathways were also identified as critical processes involved in OC. The results here highlighted key phosphorylated proteins, particularly kinases, and the corresponding cancer-related metabolic and signal pathways that played important roles in the development of OC. Additionally, the expression levels of two kinases, phosphorylated CDK (T14) and phosphorylated PRKCQ (S695), were validated by Western blot analysis in the other group of ovarian tissue samples. CONCLUSION: Altogether, our data not only provided novel insights into the potential biomarkers and therapy options for OC but also extended our knowledge on its pathophysiological mechanism.
Authors: Md Tajmul; Farhat Parween; Lata Singh; Sandeep R Mathur; J B Sharma; Sunesh Kumar; D N Sharma; Savita Yadav Journal: Int J Biol Macromol Date: 2017-12-06 Impact factor: 6.953
Authors: Oded Kopper; Chris J de Witte; Kadi Lõhmussaar; Jose Espejo Valle-Inclan; Nizar Hami; Lennart Kester; Anjali Vanita Balgobind; Jeroen Korving; Natalie Proost; Harry Begthel; Lise M van Wijk; Sonia Aristín Revilla; Rebecca Theeuwsen; Marieke van de Ven; Markus J van Roosmalen; Bas Ponsioen; Victor W H Ho; Benjamin G Neel; Tjalling Bosse; Katja N Gaarenstroom; Harry Vrieling; Maaike P G Vreeswijk; Paul J van Diest; Petronella O Witteveen; Trudy Jonges; Johannes L Bos; Alexander van Oudenaarden; Ronald P Zweemer; Hugo J G Snippert; Wigard P Kloosterman; Hans Clevers Journal: Nat Med Date: 2019-04-22 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Lin Zhang; Jia Huang; Nuo Yang; Shun Liang; Andrea Barchetti; Antonis Giannakakis; Mark G Cadungog; Ann O'Brien-Jenkins; Marco Massobrio; Katherine F Roby; Dionyssios Katsaros; Phyllis Gimotty; Ralf Butzow; Barbara L Weber; George Coukos Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2006-05-01 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: S Zhao; J Feng; C Li; H Gao; P Lv; J Li; Q Liu; Y He; H Wang; L Gong; D Li; Y Zhang Journal: J Endocrinol Invest Date: 2018-04-24 Impact factor: 4.256
Authors: Hui Zhang; Tao Liu; Zhen Zhang; Samuel H Payne; Bai Zhang; Jason E McDermott; Jian-Ying Zhou; Vladislav A Petyuk; Li Chen; Debjit Ray; Shisheng Sun; Feng Yang; Lijun Chen; Jing Wang; Punit Shah; Seong Won Cha; Paul Aiyetan; Sunghee Woo; Yuan Tian; Marina A Gritsenko; Therese R Clauss; Caitlin Choi; Matthew E Monroe; Stefani Thomas; Song Nie; Chaochao Wu; Ronald J Moore; Kun-Hsing Yu; David L Tabb; David Fenyö; Vineet Bafna; Yue Wang; Henry Rodriguez; Emily S Boja; Tara Hiltke; Robert C Rivers; Lori Sokoll; Heng Zhu; Ie-Ming Shih; Leslie Cope; Akhilesh Pandey; Bing Zhang; Michael P Snyder; Douglas A Levine; Richard D Smith; Daniel W Chan; Karin D Rodland Journal: Cell Date: 2016-06-29 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: Ian J Jacobs; Usha Menon; Andy Ryan; Aleksandra Gentry-Maharaj; Matthew Burnell; Jatinderpal K Kalsi; Nazar N Amso; Sophia Apostolidou; Elizabeth Benjamin; Derek Cruickshank; Danielle N Crump; Susan K Davies; Anne Dawnay; Stephen Dobbs; Gwendolen Fletcher; Jeremy Ford; Keith Godfrey; Richard Gunu; Mariam Habib; Rachel Hallett; Jonathan Herod; Howard Jenkins; Chloe Karpinskyj; Simon Leeson; Sara J Lewis; William R Liston; Alberto Lopes; Tim Mould; John Murdoch; David Oram; Dustin J Rabideau; Karina Reynolds; Ian Scott; Mourad W Seif; Aarti Sharma; Naveena Singh; Julie Taylor; Fiona Warburton; Martin Widschwendter; Karin Williamson; Robert Woolas; Lesley Fallowfield; Alistair J McGuire; Stuart Campbell; Mahesh Parmar; Steven J Skates Journal: Lancet Date: 2015-12-17 Impact factor: 79.321