Literature DB >> 32425122

Local Versus General Anesthesia for Balloon Dilation of the Eustachian Tube: A Single-Center Retrospective Study in a Chinese Population.

Xiaoxin Chen1,2, Lingwen Xie1,2, Haicang Zeng1,2, Yaodong Xu1,2, Hao Xiong1,2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare local anesthesia (LA) versus general anesthesia (GA) for balloon dilation of the Eustachian tube (BDET) using the Bielefeld Dilation System in a Chinese population with obstructive Eustachian tube dysfunction (OETD).
METHODS: A total of 49 patients with OETD undergoing BDET under either LA or GA were included in the present study. Intraoperative blood pressure, heart rate, and pain sensation were recorded. The surgical outcome was assessed by Eustachian Tube Dysfunction Questionnaire-7 (ETDQ-7) symptom scores and positive Valsalva maneuver at baseline, 1 day, 2-, 4-, 12-, 24-, and 52-week follow-up.
RESULTS: Balloon dilation of the Eustachian tube procedures were successfully completed in all patients without adverse effects. The visual analog scale score for maximal pain during the surgical procedure in the LA group was 6.1 ± 1.0. Intraoperative blood pressure and heart rate were higher in the LA group compared with the GA group. The duration and costs of surgery were significantly reduced in the LA group compared with the GA group. Normalization of ETDQ-7 scores at 12-week and 52-week follow-up was observed in 71.9% (23/32) and 63.3% (19/30) of patients in the LA group, respectively, which was comparable to that of the GA group. Although improvement in positive Valsalva maneuver was observed in both groups after BDET, more patients reported positive Valsalva maneuver in the GA group compared with the LA group at 12-week and 52-week follow-up. In total, 96.0% (24/25) of patients in the LA group and 95.8% (23/24) of patients in the GA group would choose LA if BDET was needed again.
CONCLUSION: Balloon dilation of the Eustachian tube under LA is safe and feasible in a Chinese population. The surgical outcome of BDET is comparable between under LA and GA during 52-week follow-up. Further studies are needed to address management of intraoperative pain and determine longer follow-up outcome for BDET under LA.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Eustachian tube; balloon dilatation; local anesthesia; monitored anesthesia care

Year:  2020        PMID: 32425122     DOI: 10.1177/0145561320923172

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Nose Throat J        ISSN: 0145-5613            Impact factor:   1.697


  3 in total

1.  Association Between Eustachian Tube Dysfunction Questionnaire-7 Scores and Eustachian Tube Function Test Results in Symptomatic Patients With a Normal Drum.

Authors:  Seojin Moon; Yujin Lee; Jinsei Jung; In Seok Moon; Seong Hoon Bae
Journal:  J Audiol Otol       Date:  2022-05-12

Review 2.  Predictive value of the Eustachian Tube Dysfunction Questionnaire-7 for identifying obstructive Eustachian tube dysfunction: A systematic review.

Authors:  Nicholas S Andresen; Jeffrey D Sharon; Carrie L Nieman; Stella M Seal; Bryan K Ward
Journal:  Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol       Date:  2021-06-24

3.  Comparison of outcomes for balloon dilation of the Eustachian tube under local vs general anesthesia.

Authors:  Joonas Toivonen; Marc Dean; Kosuke Kawai; Dennis Poe
Journal:  Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol       Date:  2022-06-24
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.