Literature DB >> 32424748

Life cycle assessment of most widely adopted solar photovoltaic energy technologies by mid-point and end-point indicators of ReCiPe method.

A Rashedi1, Taslima Khanam2.   

Abstract

The present article focuses on a cradle-to-grave life cycle assessment (LCA) of the most widely adopted solar photovoltaic power generation technologies, viz., mono-crystalline silicon (mono-Si), multi-crystalline silicon (multi-Si), amorphous silicon (a-Si) and cadmium telluride (CdTe) energy technologies, based on ReCiPe life cycle impact assessment method. LCA is the most powerful environmental impact assessment tool from a product perspective and ReCiPe is one of the most advanced LCA methodologies with the broadest set of mid-point impact categories. More importantly, ReCiPe combines the strengths of both mid-point-based life cycle impact assessment approach of CML-IA, and end-point-based approach of Eco-indicator 99 methods. Accordingly, the LCA results of all four solar PV technologies have been evaluated and compared based on 18 mid-point impact indicators (viz., climate change, ozone depletion, terrestrial acidification, freshwater eutrophication, marine eutrophication, human toxicity, photochemical oxidant formation, particulate matter formation, terrestrial ecotoxicity, freshwater ecotoxicity, marine ecotoxicity, ionising radiation, agricultural land occupation, urban land occupation, natural land transformation, water depletion, metal depletion and fossil depletion), 3 end-point/damage indicators (viz., human health, ecosystems and cost increases in resource extraction) and a unified single score. The overall study has been conducted based on hierarchist perspective and according to the relevant ISO standards. Final results show that the CdTe thin-film solar plant carries the least environmental life cycle impact within the four PV technologies, sequentially followed by multi-Si, a-Si and mono-Si technology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Amorphous silicon (a-Si) solar PV panel; Cadmium telluride (CdTe) solar PV panel; Life cycle assessment (LCA); Mono-crystalline silicon (mono-Si) solar PV panel; Multi-crystalline silicon (multi-Si) solar PV panel; ReCiPe method

Year:  2020        PMID: 32424748     DOI: 10.1007/s11356-020-09194-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int        ISSN: 0944-1344            Impact factor:   4.223


  4 in total

1.  Industry 4.0 real-world testing of dynamic organizational life cycle assessment (O-LCA) of a ceramic tile manufacturer.

Authors:  Marco Cucchi; Lucrezia Volpi; Anna Maria Ferrari; Fernando E García-Muiña; Davide Settembre-Blundo
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2022-05-13       Impact factor: 5.190

2.  A Closer Look at the Environmental Impact of Solar and Wind Energy.

Authors:  Jaime Fernández Torres; Fontina Petrakopoulou
Journal:  Glob Chall       Date:  2022-06-22

3.  Opportunity of rooftop solar photovoltaic as a cost-effective and environment-friendly power source in megacities.

Authors:  Mai Shi; Xi Lu; Haiyang Jiang; Qing Mu; Shi Chen; Rachael Marie Fleming; Ning Zhang; Ye Wu; Aoife M Foley
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2022-08-08

4.  On the Structural Performance of Recycled Aggregate Concrete Columns with Glass Fiber-Reinforced Composite Bars and Hoops.

Authors:  Ali Raza; Ahmad Rashedi; Umer Rafique; Nazia Hossain; Banjo Akinyemi; Jesuarockiam Naveen
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 4.329

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.