BACKGROUND: We evaluated the performance of conventional (C) single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and cadmium-zinc-telluride (CZT)-SPECT in a large cohort of patients with suspected or known coronary artery disease (CAD) and compared the diagnostic accuracy of the two systems using machine learning (ML) algorithms. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 517 consecutive patients underwent stress myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) by both C-SPECT and CZT-SPECT. In the overall population, an excellent correlation between stress MPI data and left ventricular (LV) functional parameters measured by C-SPECT and by CZT-SPECT was observed (all P < .001). ML analysis performed through the implementation of random forest (RF) and k-nearest neighbors (NN) algorithms proved that CZT-SPECT has greater accuracy than C-SPECT in detecting CAD. For both algorithms, the sensitivity of CZT-SPECT (96% for RF and 60% for k-NN) was greater than that of C-SPECT (88% for RF and 53% for k-NN). CONCLUSIONS: MPI data and LV functional parameters obtained by CZT-SPECT are highly reproducible and provide good correlation with those obtained by C-SPECT. ML approach showed that the accuracy and sensitivity of CZT-SPECT is greater than C-SPECT in detecting CAD.
BACKGROUND: We evaluated the performance of conventional (C) single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and cadmium-zinc-telluride (CZT)-SPECT in a large cohort of patients with suspected or known coronary artery disease (CAD) and compared the diagnostic accuracy of the two systems using machine learning (ML) algorithms. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 517 consecutive patients underwent stress myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) by both C-SPECT and CZT-SPECT. In the overall population, an excellent correlation between stress MPI data and left ventricular (LV) functional parameters measured by C-SPECT and by CZT-SPECT was observed (all P < .001). ML analysis performed through the implementation of random forest (RF) and k-nearest neighbors (NN) algorithms proved that CZT-SPECT has greater accuracy than C-SPECT in detecting CAD. For both algorithms, the sensitivity of CZT-SPECT (96% for RF and 60% for k-NN) was greater than that of C-SPECT (88% for RF and 53% for k-NN). CONCLUSIONS: MPI data and LV functional parameters obtained by CZT-SPECT are highly reproducible and provide good correlation with those obtained by C-SPECT. ML approach showed that the accuracy and sensitivity of CZT-SPECT is greater than C-SPECT in detecting CAD.
Authors: Robert C Hendel; Daniel S Berman; Marcelo F Di Carli; Paul A Heidenreich; Robert E Henkin; Patricia A Pellikka; Gerald M Pohost; Kim A Williams Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2009-06-09 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Daniel S Berman; Xingping Kang; Balaji Tamarappoo; Arik Wolak; Sean W Hayes; Ryo Nakazato; Louise E J Thomson; Faith Kite; Ishac Cohen; Piotr J Slomka; Andrew J Einstein; John D Friedman Journal: JACC Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2009-03
Authors: Fabio P Esteves; Paolo Raggi; Russell D Folks; Zohar Keidar; J Wells Askew; Shmuel Rispler; Michael K O'Connor; Liudmilla Verdes; Ernest V Garcia Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2009-08-18 Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: George Crișan; Nastasia Sanda Moldovean-Cioroianu; Diana-Gabriela Timaru; Gabriel Andrieș; Călin Căinap; Vasile Chiș Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2022-04-30 Impact factor: 6.208
Authors: Erito Marques de Souza Filho; Fernando de Amorim Fernandes; Christiane Wiefels; Lucas Nunes Dalbonio de Carvalho; Tadeu Francisco Dos Santos; Alair Augusto Sarmet M D Dos Santos; Evandro Tinoco Mesquita; Flávio Luiz Seixas; Benjamin J W Chow; Claudio Tinoco Mesquita; Ronaldo Altenburg Gismondi Journal: Front Cardiovasc Med Date: 2021-11-11
Authors: Valeria Cantoni; Roberta Green; Carlo Ricciardi; Roberta Assante; Leandro Donisi; Emilia Zampella; Giuseppe Cesarelli; Carmela Nappi; Vincenzo Sannino; Valeria Gaudieri; Teresa Mannarino; Andrea Genova; Giovanni De Simini; Alessia Giordano; Adriana D'Antonio; Wanda Acampa; Mario Petretta; Alberto Cuocolo Journal: Comput Math Methods Med Date: 2021-10-16 Impact factor: 2.238