Literature DB >> 32424429

Neurologically Devastating Intraparenchymal Hemorrhage in COVID-19 Patients on Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: A Case Series.

Sabrina M Heman-Ackah1, YouRong Sophie Su1, Michael Spadola1, Dmitriy Petrov1, H Isaac Chen1, James Schuster1, Timothy Lucas1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND IMPORTANCE: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) represents a life-saving therapy in cases of refractory hypoxia and has been utilized in patients suffering from the most severe forms of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). A strikingly high mortality rate of 94% was described in early reports of patients with COVID-19 transitioned to ECMO. Later case reports and series demonstrating successful recovery from COVID-19 after ECMO have revived interest in this therapeutic modality, including the recent approval of ECMO for COVID-19 patients by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Here, we present the first reports of devastating intracranial hemorrhage as a complication of veno-venous (VV) ECMO in two COVID-19 patients. CLINICAL
PRESENTATION: We performed a retrospective analysis of 2 cases of devastating intracranial hemorrhage in patients on VV-ECMO for the treatment of COVID-19. Collected data included clinical history, laboratory results, treatment, and review of all available imaging. Both patients demonstrated activated partial thromboplastin times (aPTT) within an appropriate therapeutic range. No risk factors that clearly predicted likelihood of this complication were identified.
CONCLUSION: Understanding the complications of ECMO in this cohort and developing therapeutic algorithms to aid in optimal patient selection will be critical in the limited resource setting experienced as a result of global pandemic. We propose the use of head computed tomography (CT) to identify devastating neurological complications as early as possible, aiding in the resource allocation of ECMO machines to the most appropriately selected patients.
Copyright © 2020 by the Congress of Neurological Surgeons.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19; Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; Intracranial hemorrhage; Intraparenchymal hemorrhage; Patient selection; Resource allocation; SARS-CoV-2

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32424429      PMCID: PMC7313766          DOI: 10.1093/neuros/nyaa198

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurgery        ISSN: 0148-396X            Impact factor:   4.654


activated partial thromboplastin times acute respiratory distress syndrome continuous positive airway pressure computed tomography head CTs extracorporeal membrane oxygenation Food and Drug Administration intracranial hemorrhage intraparenchymal hemorrhage medical intensive care unit polymerase chain reaction severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 systemic lupus erythematosus obstructuve sleep apnea veno-venous

The respiratory illness, COVID-19, caused by the virus severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has caused a sudden onset and rapidly evolving pandemic. The natural progression for those developing the severe and life-threatening form of the disease has been described as clinically similar to acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), often requiring intubation, lung-protective ventilation strategies, proning and extracorporal membrane oxygenation (ECMO).[1] Over the last 3 decades, ECMO has gained increasing traction in the treatment of patients with severe ARDS who develop refractory hypoxia,[2] and has thus been proposed in the treatment of patients with the most severe forms of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).[3,4] The most common complications of ECMO are bleeding and thrombosis. Not only do patients on ECMO require therapeutic anticoagulation to maintain therapy, which predisposes patients to additional bleeding complications,[5] but the bypass itself both consumes and damages platelets and dilutes clotting factors.[6] Intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), in the setting of ECMO, is a recognized entity, with rates up to 21%.[7] The most consistent factors that have been demonstrated to increase the risk of ECMO-related ICH have been prehospitalization anticoagulation therapy and thrombocytopenia.[7,8] Here, we describe 2 patients who required ECMO for refractory hypoxia secondary to COVID-19 and developed neurologically devastating intraparenchymal hemorrhage (IPH) despite lacking the classical risk factors.

CLINICAL PRESENTATION

Per institutional guidelines, consent was not required and thus was not obtained or sought.

Case 1

A 58-yr-old female with a past medical history of diabetes and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), who presented with 6 d of cough, fever, and shortness of breath, determined to have COVID-19 with positive SARS-CoV-2 polymerase chain reaction (PCR). The patient's respiratory illness had improved with prolonged ECMO, as evidenced by progressively increased areas of aeration on chest X-ray (CXR, Figure 1A and 1B). The patient had been intubated and placed on ECMO prior to transfer (hospital day 1) and was placed prone overnight for 16 h/d beginning on hospital day 16. On hospital day 19, she was noted to have a nonreactive right pupil after being returned supine in the morning. Head CT demonstrated a large volume (8.4 × 4.6 × 4.7 cm) left frontal IPH with a 1.3 cm left to right midline shift, as well as sulcal effacement, and uncal and subfalcine herniation (Figure 2A and 2B). She had been heparinized since the initiation of VV-ECMO with an aPTT of 60 at the time of hemorrhage. Patient was comfortably extubated on hospital day 20 and expired.
FIGURE 1.

Fifty-eight-year-old (F) patient with past medical history of diabetes and SLE, presented with COVID-19 on ECMO. CXR on day 1 A and day 19 B after transfer to the heart and vascular intensive care unit (HVICU).

FIGURE 2.

CTH on HVICU day 19, demonstrating a large-volume dominant hemisphere, frontal IPH, left to right midline shift, and near-complete effacement of the lateral ventricles A as well as obliteration of the basal cisterns B.

Fifty-eight-year-old (F) patient with past medical history of diabetes and SLE, presented with COVID-19 on ECMO. CXR on day 1 A and day 19 B after transfer to the heart and vascular intensive care unit (HVICU). CTH on HVICU day 19, demonstrating a large-volume dominant hemisphere, frontal IPH, left to right midline shift, and near-complete effacement of the lateral ventricles A as well as obliteration of the basal cisterns B.

Case 2

A 46-yr-old male with a past medical history of hypertension and obstructuve sleep apnea (OSA), on nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) at home. The patient presented with 7 d of cough, fever, and shortness of breath and was ultimately determined to have COVID-19 with positive SARS-CoV-2 PCR and characteristic infiltrates on lung imaging (Figure 3). He was transferred to the medical intensive care unit (MICU) for progressive respiratory distress and was intubated and transitioned to ECMO on day 6 of admission. On hospital day 13, he was noted to have a fixed and dilated left pupil. Head CT demonstrated a large (6.7 × 6.0 × 5.9 cm) left frontal IPH with a 1.4 cm left to right midline shift, as well as uncal and subfalcine herniation (Figure 4). He had been heparinized since the initiation of VV-ECMO with an aPTT of 71 at the time of hemorrhage. Patient was comfortably extubated and expired.
FIGURE 3.

Forty-six-year-old (M) patient with a past medical history of HTN and OSA, presenting with COVID-19 on ECMO. CXR on day 0 A and on day 5 B after transfer to the MICU. C, CT chest on MICU day 7.

FIGURE 4.

A, CTH on MICU day 7 with a large-volume frontoparietal IPH displacing the motor strip. B, CTH slice with the largest volume of IPH, demonstrating a fluid-fluid level. Also apparent are significant left-to-right midline shift C and uncal herniation D.

Forty-six-year-old (M) patient with a past medical history of HTN and OSA, presenting with COVID-19 on ECMO. CXR on day 0 A and on day 5 B after transfer to the MICU. C, CT chest on MICU day 7. A, CTH on MICU day 7 with a large-volume frontoparietal IPH displacing the motor strip. B, CTH slice with the largest volume of IPH, demonstrating a fluid-fluid level. Also apparent are significant left-to-right midline shift C and uncal herniation D.

DISCUSSION

ICH is a well-described complication of ECMO, regardless of initial etiology.[8] While it is generally accepted that the risk of bleeding complications on ECMO rises with marked derangements in the clotting cascade,[9] no such alterations could be identified in the COVID-19 patients described here (Table). Patients on ECMO secondary to viral respiratory illnesses have previously been shown to have a high rate of devastating ICH in the setting of the 2009 H1N1 influenza.[10,11] While the precise mechanisms underlying this phenomenon remain unclear, this and other series have suggested that microvascular thrombosis may underlie ischemia and subsequent hemorrhage in these patients, a finding that is particularly relevant in the case of COVID-19, for which microvascular thrombosis has been observed as a precipitator of respiratory pathology.[12] In addition, COVID-19 has been hypothesized to cause a cytokine storm, which may result in platelet dysfunction, despite normal platelet counts, as observed here.
TABLE.

Laboratory Values of COVID-19 Patients on ECMO

Laboratory valueReference range46-yr-old (M) patient (admit)46-yr-old (M) patient (IPH)58-yr-old (F) patient (admit)58-yr-old (F) patient (IPH)
White blood cells4.0-11.032.641.35.515.6
Hemoglobin13.5-17.513.29.013.57.4
Hematocrit40-52392643.722
Platelets150-400351197188139
aPTT25.1-36.526.370.934.260.3
PT9.4-12.515.714.418.117.8b
INR0.8-1.11.41.31.61.6b
d-dimer0.00-0.50Unavailable1.04bUnavailable19.72c
Fibrinogen170-410649592158a250a
AST15-41511123229
ALT17-6348511022
AP38-12652913658
Direct bilirubin0.1-0.51.00.80.10.2
Indirect bilirubin0.2-0.70.40.90.20.4
Total bilirubin0.3-1.21.41.70.30.6

aPTT = activated partial thromboplastin time, PT = prothrombin time, INR = international normalized ration, AST = aspartate amino transferase, ALT = alanine amino transferase, AP = alkaline phosphatase.

Laboratory values of COVID-19 patients on ECMO on admission (adenotes laboratory values obtained greater than 24 h after admission), or within 24 h prior to hemorrhage, unless otherwise noted by b(obtained more than 24 h prior to the identification of hemorrhage) or c(obtained after the identification of hemorrhage).

Laboratory Values of COVID-19 Patients on ECMO aPTT = activated partial thromboplastin time, PT = prothrombin time, INR = international normalized ration, AST = aspartate amino transferase, ALT = alanine amino transferase, AP = alkaline phosphatase. Laboratory values of COVID-19 patients on ECMO on admission (adenotes laboratory values obtained greater than 24 h after admission), or within 24 h prior to hemorrhage, unless otherwise noted by b(obtained more than 24 h prior to the identification of hemorrhage) or c(obtained after the identification of hemorrhage). Lastly, the condition of a global pandemic has generated an unprecedented requirement for resource allocation and promotion of interventions that provide the highest value care—a function of quality, efficacy, safety, and cost. Lidegran et al[13] conducted a retrospective review of head CTs (CTHs) performed on patients while on ECMO.[13] Notably, they observed a rate of 37% of CTHs with ICH or cerebral infarction, and 13% of these with findings significant enough to motivate withdrawal of ECMO. Coupled with the 94.1% mortality of patients placed on ECMO for refractory hypoxia in the largest available cohort study of COVID-19 patients,[14] a compelling argument for the utilization of CTH screening in patients on ECMO for COVID-19 can be made. Portable CT has the potential to identify patients who have suffered a brain injury that would otherwise be overlooked due to the poor reliability of coagulation derangements as a clinical predictor of hemorrhage in this cohort, as well as the inability to perform neurological assessments in the setting of paralysis and sedation. This could reduce the length of time that ventilators and ECMO machines are being utilized in patients who have unknowingly suffered devastating neurological injury, increasing the availability of these scare resources for patients who retain a high probability of meaningful recovery.

CONCLUSION

IPH is a well-described and important complication of ECMO. Despite occurring in the first 4 d on ECMO circuit,[15] these intracranial complications are often devastating, detected in a delayed fashion, and generally a terminal event with no indication for intervention. CT screening could be utilized to identify patients who have suffered a brain injury that would otherwise be undetected due to the poor reliability of classic coagulation markers as accurate clinical predictors of hemorrhage in this cohort, as well as the inability to perform neurological assessments in the setting of paralysis, sedation, and proning.

Disclosures

The authors have no personal, financial, or institutional interest in any of the drugs, materials, or devices described in this article.
  14 in total

1.  Cranial CT for diagnosis of intracranial complications in adult and pediatric patients during ECMO: Clinical benefits in diagnosis and treatment.

Authors:  Marika K Lidegran; Mikael Mosskin; Hans G Ringertz; Björn P Frenckner; Viveka B Lindén
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.173

Review 2.  Systemic consequences of ventricular assist devices: alterations of coagulation, immune function, inflammation, and the neuroendocrine system.

Authors:  Craig R Hampton; Edward D Verrier
Journal:  Artif Organs       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 3.094

3.  Intracranial Hemorrhage Occurs Early in Patients With Severe Respiratory Failure Requiring Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.

Authors:  Daniel Taylor; Duncan Wyncoll
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 7.598

4.  Successful treatment of COVID-19 using extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, a case report.

Authors:  W-Q Zhan; M-D Li; M Xu; Y-B Lu
Journal:  Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 3.507

Review 5.  Intracranial hemorrhage in adults on ECMO.

Authors:  Yiorgos Alexandros Cavayas; Lorenzo Del Sorbo; Eddy Fan
Journal:  Perfusion       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Outcome in patients with H1N1 influenza and cerebrovascular injury treated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

Authors:  Felicia C Chow; Brian L Edlow; Matthew P Frosch; William A Copen; David M Greer
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 3.210

Review 7.  Bleeding and Thrombotic Complications in the Use of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.

Authors:  James Thomas; Vadim Kostousov; Jun Teruya
Journal:  Semin Thromb Hemost       Date:  2017-09-12       Impact factor: 4.180

8.  Management of intracranial hemorrhage in adult patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO): An observational cohort study.

Authors:  Alexander Fletcher-Sandersjöö; Eric Peter Thelin; Jiri Bartek; Adrian Elmi-Terander; Mikael Broman; Bo-Michael Bellander
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Coronavirus Disease 2019 in Shanghai, China.

Authors:  Xin Li; Zhen Guo; Bailing Li; Xiaolin Zhang; Rui Tian; Wei Wu; Zhongwei Zhang; Yunfei Lu; Nan Chen; Sean P Clifford; Jiapeng Huang
Journal:  ASAIO J       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 2.872

10.  Treatment for severe acute respiratory distress syndrome from COVID-19.

Authors:  Michael A Matthay; J Matthew Aldrich; Jeffrey E Gotts
Journal:  Lancet Respir Med       Date:  2020-03-20       Impact factor: 30.700

View more
  15 in total

1.  Characterization of Hemorrhagic and Ischemic Stroke in a Diverse Cohort of COVID-19 Patients.

Authors:  Alexander D Ramos; Feliks Koyfman; Kory Byrns; Alan Wu; Jay Yasen; Lauren Elreda; Srikanth Boddu; Sammy Pishanidar; Baxter Allen; Rupa G Juthani
Journal:  Neurohospitalist       Date:  2021-02-05

2.  Age-Associated Neurological Complications of COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Brianne N Sullivan; Tracy Fischer
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2021-08-02       Impact factor: 5.750

3.  A Review of Pathophysiology, Clinical Features, and Management Options of COVID-19 Associated Coagulopathy.

Authors:  Julie Goswami; Taleen A MacArthur; Meera Sridharan; Rajiv K Pruthi; Robert D McBane; Thomas E Witzig; Myung S Park
Journal:  Shock       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 3.533

Review 4.  Severe Neurologic Complications of SARS-CoV-2.

Authors:  Daniella C Sisniega; Alexandra S Reynolds
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Neurol       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 3.598

Review 5.  The relationship between COVID-19 infection and intracranial hemorrhage: A systematic review.

Authors:  Samuel R Daly; Anthony V Nguyen; Yilu Zhang; Dongxia Feng; Jason H Huang
Journal:  Brain Hemorrhages       Date:  2021-11-11

6.  A Double-Edged Sword: Neurologic Complications and Mortality in Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Therapy for COVID-19-Related Severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome at a Tertiary Care Center.

Authors:  J Masur; C W Freeman; S Mohan
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2020-08-27       Impact factor: 3.825

7.  Intracranial hemorrhage in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients.

Authors:  Isaac Cheruiyot; Prabjot Sehmi; Beryl Ominde; Paul Bundi; Musa Mislani; Brian Ngure; Beda Olabu; Julius A Ogeng'o
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2020-11-03       Impact factor: 3.307

Review 8.  Neurological manifestations of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2-a controversy 'gone viral'.

Authors:  Moritz Förster; Vivien Weyers; Patrick Küry; Michael Barnett; Hans-Peter Hartung; David Kremer
Journal:  Brain Commun       Date:  2020-09-17

9.  What Now for Rehabilitation Specialists? Coronavirus Disease 2019 Questions and Answers.

Authors:  Simge J Yonter; Katherine Alter; Matthew N Bartels; Jonathan F Bean; Martin B Brodsky; Marlís González-Fernández; David K Henderson; Helen Hoenig; Holly Russell; Dale M Needham; Sowmya Kumble; Leighton Chan
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2020-09-20       Impact factor: 3.966

Review 10.  Blood Biomarkers for Detection of Brain Injury in COVID-19 Patients.

Authors:  Steven T DeKosky; Patrick M Kochanek; Alex B Valadka; Robert S B Clark; Sherry H-Y Chou; Alicia K Au; Christopher Horvat; Ruchira M Jha; Rebekah Mannix; Stephen R Wisniewski; Max Wintermark; Susan E Rowell; Robert D Welch; Lawrence Lewis; Stacey House; Rudolph E Tanzi; Darci R Smith; Amy Y Vittor; Nancy D Denslow; Michael D Davis; Olena Y Glushakova; Ronald L Hayes
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2020-11-11       Impact factor: 5.269

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.