| Literature DB >> 32424225 |
Da Young Shin1, Soo Ji Jeon1, Hae Young Lopilly Park1, Chan Kee Park2.
Abstract
In meta-analyses, it has been reported that myopia is a risk factor for glaucoma and there is increasing evidence that autonomic dysfunction causing vascular dysregulation or perfusion dysfunction is considered an important factor in the progression of glaucoma. There have been experimental studies to find out the association between autonomic nervous system and ocular growth, but no clinical study yet has evaluated the relationship between them. Therefore, we enrolled 208 open angle glaucoma patients and measured heart-rate-variability(HRV). We used the standard deviation value of the qualified normal to normal intervals (SDNN) parameter of HRV, which is considered an autonomic influence index and characterized the total effect of the regulation of autonomic blood circulation. Patients were classified into the two groups according to SDNN: those with low possibility of autonomic dysfunction (LoAD group) and those with high possibility of autonomic dysfunction (HiAD group). We evaluated myopic features employing a 'posterior scleral profile' identified by the disc tilt ratio, disc torsion, fovea-BMO center (FoBMO) angle and peripapapillary area(PPA) to disc ratio. HiAD group showed higher values than LoAD group in posterior scleral deformation profile such like axial length, disc tilt, torsion degree. We suggest the possibility of association between myopic deformation and autonomic dysfunction.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32424225 PMCID: PMC7235030 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-65037-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Comparison of the Demographics and test result between LoAD and HiAD group.
| Variables | LoAD group, 164 eyes 164 patients | HiAD group, 44 eyes 44 patients | P value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, y | 53.29 | 52.45 | 0.700* |
| Sex, male/female | 58/106 | 14/30 | 0.660† |
| CCT, μm | 528.06 | 519.41 | 0.322* |
| history of refractive surgery, n(%) | 10 (6.1%) | 4 (9.1%) | 0.482† |
| history of diabetes, n(%) | 6 (3.7%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0.198† |
| history of hypertension, n(%) | 16 (9.8%) | 6 (13.6%) | 0.457† |
| history of CVA, n(%) | 4 (2.4%) | 2 (4.5%) | 0.459† |
| Migrain, n(%) | 34 (20.7%) | 11 (25.0%) | 0.541† |
| Spherical equivalent, D | −3.15 | −3.78 | 0.461* |
| Axial length, mm | 25.04 | 25.94 | 0.022* |
| PPA/Disc area, per 1 µm larger (%) | 54.04 | 55.32 | 0.926† |
| Tilt ratio | 1.21 | 1.28 | 0.049† |
| Torsion degree | 5.99 | 11.60 | 0.005† |
| FoBMO angle | −6.33 | −5.83 | 0.420* |
| Disc hemorrhage, n (%) | 28 (17.1%) | 6 (13.6%) | 0.584† |
| VF MD, dB | −4.54 | −5.63 | 0.199* |
| VF PSD, dB | 5.40 | 4.93 | 0.796* |
| Average RNFL thickness | 77.97 | 74.34 | 0.078* |
Data are presented as mean standard deviation.
CCT = central corneal thickness; CVA = cerebrovascular accident; D = diopter; PPA = peripapillary atrophy; FoBMO = fovea-BMO center; VF = visual field; MD = mean deviation; PSD = pattern standard deviation; RNFL = retinal nerve fiber layer.
Statistically significant values (p < 0.05) appear in boldface.
*Comparison was performed using independent samples t-test.
†Comparison was performed using a chi-squared test and Fisher’s exact test.
Logistic regression results for factors associated with the autonomic dysfunction (n = 208).
| Variables | Simple model | Multiple model | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Odds Ratio, 95% CI | P value | Odds Ratio, 95% CI | P value | |
| Age, y | 0.99, 0.97–1.02 | 0.699 | ||
| Sex, male/female | 1.17, 0.58–2.39 | 0.661 | ||
| CCT, μm | 0.99, 0.98–1.00 | 0.218 | ||
| history of refractive surgery, n(%) | 1.54, 0.46–5.17 | 0.485 | ||
| history of diabetics, n(%) | 0.00, 0.00–0.00 | 0.999 | ||
| history of hypertension, n(%) | 1.46, 0.54–3.99 | 0.459 | ||
| Self reported history of CVA, n(%) | 1.91, 0.34–10.76 | 0.466 | ||
| Migrain,n(%) | 1.28, 0.58–2.78 | 0.542 | ||
| Spherical equivalent, D | 0.97, 0.90–1.04 | 0.379 | ||
| Axial length, mm | 1.32, 1.08–1.63 | 0.008* | 0.85, 0.67–1.09 | 0.203 |
| PPA/Disc area, per 1 µm larger (%) | 1.02, 0.67–1.55 | 0.926 | ||
| Tilt ratio | 4.64, 0.95–22.72 | 0.058* | 0.33, 0.05–2.20 | 0.251 |
| Torsion degree | 1.07, 1.03–1.11 | <0.001* | 0.94, 0.90–0.98 | 0.008** |
| FoBMO angle | 1.04, 0.95–1.14 | 0.418 | ||
| Disc hemorrhage, n (%) | 0.77, 0.30–1.99 | 0.585 | ||
| VF MD, dB | 0.96, 0.90–1.02 | 0.200* | 0.95, 0.86–1.05 | 0.329 |
| VF PSD, dB | 0.99, 0.92–1.07 | 0.836 | ||
| Average RNFL thickness | 0.98, 0.95–1.00 | 0.080* | 1.01, 0.97–1.05 | 0.608 |
CCT = central corneal thickness; CVA = cerebrovascular accident; D = diopter; PPA = peripapillary atrophy; FoBMO = fovea-BMO center; VF = visual field; MD = mean deviation; PSD = pattern standard deviation; RNFL = retinal nerve fiber layer.
Statistically significant values appear in boldface.
*p < 0.2.
**Statistically significant values, p = 0.04 after Bonferroni correction.
Figure 1A representative case. A1. A 46-year-old woman. Her SDNN of HRV was 34.87. She was classified as LoAD group. Her axial length was 28.31 mm. B1. A 32-year-old man. His SDNN of HRV was 14.71. He was classified as HiAD group. His axial length was 27.93 mm. A2. Tilt ratio was defined as the ratio between the longest diameter (LD) and the shortest diameter (SD) of the optic disc. Tilt ratio of LoAD group patient was 1.10. B2. Tilt ratio of HiAD group patient was 1.92. A3. Torsion degree was measured between the LD and the horizontal line connecting the fovea and the center of the optic disc. Torsion degree of LoAD group patients was 6.5 . B3. Torsion degree of HiAD group patients was 17.5 . A4. PPA/disc ratio was defined as the ratio between area of D and area of P. PPA/disc ratio of LoAD group patients was 0.51. B4. PPA/disc ratio of HiAD group patients was 0.96.