Literature DB >> 32424061

Trust, trustworthiness and sharing patient data for research.

Mark Sheehan1, Phoebe Friesen2, Adrian Balmer3, Corina Cheeks3, Sara Davidson3, James Devereux3, Douglas Findlay3, Katharine Keats-Rohan3, Rob Lawrence3, Kamran Shafiq4.   

Abstract

When it comes to using patient data from the National Health Service (NHS) for research, we are often told that it is a matter of trust: we need to trust, we need to build trust, we need to restore trust. Various policy papers and reports articulate and develop these ideas and make very important contributions to public dialogue on the trustworthiness of our research institutions. But these documents and policies are apparently constructed with little sustained reflection on the nature of trust and trustworthiness, and therefore are missing important features that matter for how we manage concerns related to trust. We suggest that what we mean by 'trust' and 'trustworthiness' matters and should affect the policies and guidance that govern data sharing in the NHS. We offer a number of initial, general reflections on the way in which some of these features might affect our approach to principles, policies and strategies that are related to sharing patient data for research. This paper is the outcome of a 'public ethics' coproduction activity which involved members of the public and two academic ethicists. Our task was to consider collectively the accounts of trust developed by philosophers as they applied in the context of the NHS and to coproduce an argumentative position relevant to this context. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  confidentiality/privacy; information technology; interests of health personnel/institutions; public health ethics; research ethics

Year:  2020        PMID: 32424061     DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2019-106048

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN: 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


  8 in total

1.  21st Century Cures Act: ethical recommendations for new patient-facing products.

Authors:  Brigitte N Durieux; Matthew DeCamp; Charlotta Lindvall
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2022-09-12       Impact factor: 7.942

2.  Health data research on sudden cardiac arrest: perspectives of survivors and their next-of-kin.

Authors:  Marieke A R Bak; Rens Veeken; Marieke T Blom; Hanno L Tan; Dick L Willems
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 2.652

3.  Ethical Issues in Consent for the Reuse of Data in Health Data Platforms.

Authors:  Alex McKeown; Miranda Mourby; Paul Harrison; Sophie Walker; Mark Sheehan; Ilina Singh
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 3.525

4.  What can data trusts for health research learn from participatory governance in biobanks?

Authors:  Richard Milne; Annie Sorbie; Mary Dixon-Woods
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2021-03-19       Impact factor: 5.926

5.  What influences a person's willingness to share health information for both direct care and uses beyond direct care? Findings from a focus group study in Ireland.

Authors:  Sarah Jane Flaherty; Catherine Duggan; Laura O'Connor; Barbara Foley; Rachel Flynn
Journal:  HRB Open Res       Date:  2022-05-10

6.  A concentric circles view of health data relations facilitates understanding of sociotechnical challenges for learning health systems and the role of federated data networks.

Authors:  Richard Milne; Mark Sheehan; Brendan Barnes; Janek Kapper; Nathan Lea; James N'Dow; Gurparkash Singh; Amelia Martín-Uranga; Nigel Hughes
Journal:  Front Big Data       Date:  2022-09-16

7.  Demonstrating trustworthiness when collecting and sharing genomic data: public views across 22 countries.

Authors:  Richard Milne; Katherine I Morley; Mohamed A Almarri; Shamim Anwer; Jerome Atutornu; Elena E Baranova; Paul Bevan; Maria Cerezo; Yali Cong; Alessia Costa; Christine Critchley; Josepine Fernow; Peter Goodhand; Qurratulain Hasan; Aiko Hibino; Gry Houeland; Heidi C Howard; S Zakir Hussain; Charlotta Ingvoldstad Malmgren; Vera L Izhevskaya; Aleksandra Jędrzejak; Cao Jinhong; Megumi Kimura; Erika Kleiderman; Brandi Leach; Keying Liu; Deborah Mascalzoni; Álvaro Mendes; Jusaku Minari; Dianne Nicol; Emilia Niemiec; Christine Patch; Jack Pollard; Barbara Prainsack; Marie Rivière; Lauren Robarts; Jonathan Roberts; Virginia Romano; Haytham A Sheerah; James Smith; Alexandra Soulier; Claire Steed; Vigdis Stefànsdóttir; Cornelia Tandre; Adrian Thorogood; Torsten H Voigt; Nan Wang; Anne V West; Go Yoshizawa; Anna Middleton
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 11.117

8.  Ethics review of big data research: What should stay and what should be reformed?

Authors:  Agata Ferretti; Marcello Ienca; Mark Sheehan; Alessandro Blasimme; Edward S Dove; Bobbie Farsides; Phoebe Friesen; Jeff Kahn; Walter Karlen; Peter Kleist; S Matthew Liao; Camille Nebeker; Gabrielle Samuel; Mahsa Shabani; Minerva Rivas Velarde; Effy Vayena
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 2.652

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.