| Literature DB >> 32423605 |
Sejong Chun1, Hyungsuk Kim2, Jae Won Yun3, HongBi Yu4, Ji Young Seo3, Duck Cho5.
Abstract
Weak D types 1, 2, 3 and Asia type DEL (RHD 1227 G > A) can be treated as D-positive for purposes of Rho(D) immune globulin (RhIG) administration or selection of blood components for transfusion. To confirm these D variants, RHD genotyping can be used as a complementary to serologic tests. While ruling out weak D types 1,2,3 is useful in Caucasian populations, these are extremely rare in the Asian population, while Asia type DEL is relatively common. Distinguishing between true D-negative and Asia type DEL (RHD 1227 G > A) by genotyping has the same utility of distinguishing weak D types 1, 2, 3. The main difference between weak D and Asia type DEL is that the latter appears as D negative in conventional serologic methods, while the former will show positive in indirect anti-human immunoglobulin tests. RHD genotyping in apparent D-negative Asian patients has been established, yet the utility of genotyping in Asian patients with weakened D phenotypes require further investigation. We have observed cases of weak D patients with coexistence of a weak D allele and an Asia type DEL (RHD 1227 G > A) allele, we have found that antigen expression of D is as the weak D in indirect antiglobulin testing, yet all epitopes are detected with adsorption and elution assays. This is indicative of completeness of the D antigen epitope, and thus we suggest that all Asian patients with weakened D phenotypes can benefit from RHD genotyping.Entities:
Keywords: Alloimmunization; Anti-D; RHD genotype; RhD; Rho(D) immune globulin; Weak D
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32423605 DOI: 10.1016/j.transci.2020.102807
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Transfus Apher Sci ISSN: 1473-0502 Impact factor: 1.764