| Literature DB >> 32423092 |
Zhiwen Wang1,2, Jie Li2, Guilong Zhang2, Yancai Zhi2, Dianlin Yang2, Xin Lai2, Tianzhi Ren1,2.
Abstract
According to its characteristics, biochar originating originating from biomass is accepted as a multifunctional carbon material that supports a wide range of applications. With the successfully used in reducingEntities:
Keywords: NH4+-N adsorption; adsorption mechanism; biochar aging; characterization
Year: 2020 PMID: 32423092 PMCID: PMC7287775 DOI: 10.3390/ma13102270
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Physiochemical properties of the original and acid-modified biochar.
| Samples | Ash Content | Volatile Content | Water Content | Fixed Carbon | pHpzc |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| wt.% | wt.% | wt.% | wt.% | pH Unit | |
| PBC | 32.54 | 24.36 | 0.74 | 42.36 | 9.20 |
| H2O-PBC | 11.76 | 30.30 | 0.98 | 56.96 | 8.60 |
| HCl-PBC | 8.52 | 27.77 | 0.78 | 62.93 | 5.00 |
| H2O2-PBC | 6.83 | 21.00 | 0.65 | 71.52 | 7.20 |
| H2SO4-PBC | 7.42 | 24.88 | 0.82 | 66.88 | 6.90 |
Figure 1The gas adsorption, desorption isotherms and the distribution curves of the biochar pore size. ((A,C,E) were adsorbed by CO2 and (B,D,F) were adsorbed by N2).
Figure 2Scanning electron microscopy images of the five biochar samples. (A–E) represent the images for PBC, H2O-PBC, HCl-PBC, H2SO4-PBC and H2O2-PBC, respectively.
Figure 3XRD patterns of the different biochar samples.
Figure 4FTIR spectra of the biochar samples before (a) and after the adsorption of NH4+-N (b).
Figure 5The ratio of N-functional groups on the biochar before and after NH4+-N adsorption (A: before adsorption and B: after adsorption).
Figure 6Adsorption isotherms of NH4+-N on the biochar samples as well as modeling with the Langmuir (a) and Freundlich (b) models.
Fitting parameters for the Langmuir and Freundlich isotherms of NH4+-N adsorption in an aqueous solution on the differently treated biochar.
| Adsorbents | Langmuir Model | Freundlich Model | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qm (mg·g−1) | b (mg·L−1) | R2 | KF (mg·g−1) | n | R2 | |
| PBC | 24.58 | 5.00 × 10−3 | 0.98 | 0.84 | 2.10 | 0.93 |
| H2O-PBC | 60.50 | 1.78 × 10−3 | 0.99 | 0.49 | 1.56 | 0.99 |
| HCl-PBC | 100.28 | 4.00 × 10−3 | 0.99 | 1.89 | 2.34 | 0.94 |
| H2SO4-PBC | 120.01 | 3.12 × 10−3 | 0.99 | 2.07 | 1.78 | 0.95 |
| H2O2-PBC | 123.23 | 4.40 × 10−3 | 0.99 | 3.03 | 1.90 | 0.95 |
Figure 7Adsorption kinetics of NH4+-N on the five kinds of biochar fitted with the pseudo-first-order (a) and pseudo-second-order models (b).
Kinetic parameters of the pseudo-first-order and pseudo-second-order equations for NH4+-N adsorption on the five kinds of biochar.
| Adsorbents | Pseudo-First-Order Kinetics | Pseudo-Second-Order Kinetics | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K1 (min−1) | Qe (mg·g−1) | R2 | v0 (g·mg−1·min−1) | Qe (mg·g−1) | R2 | |
| PBC | 0.15 | 7.20 | 0.99 | 0.79 | 7.53 | 0.92 |
| H2O-PBC | 0.15 | 9.80 | 0.99 | 1.03 | 10.29 | 0.96 |
| HCl-PBC | 0.16 | 14.22 | 0.95 | 1.69 | 14.83 | 0.94 |
| H2SO4-PBC | 0.12 | 20.65 | 0.98 | 1.75 | 21.65 | 0.96 |
| H2O2-PBC | 0.12 | 22.93 | 0.99 | 1.98 | 24.10 | 0.98 |
Figure 8Adsorption kinetics of NH4+-N on the biochar samples as well as modeling through the intraparticle diffusion model (t is the adsorption time).
Comparison of the maximum ammonium adsorption capacity onto various adsorbents.
| Adsorbent | Capacity NH4+-N (mg·g−1) | Concentration Range NH4+-N (mg·L−1) | Contact Time | pH | Temperature (°C) | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PBC | 24.58 | 20–1000 | 24 h | ≈7 | 25 | This article |
| H2O-PBC | 60.50 | 20–1000 | 24 h | ≈7 | 25 | This article |
| HCl-PBC | 100.28 | 20–1000 | 24 h | ≈7 | 25 | This article |
| H2SO4-PBC | 120.01 | 20–1000 | 24 h | ≈7 | 25 | This article |
| H2O2-PBC | 123.23 | 20–1000 | 24 h | ≈7 | 25 | This article |
| Peanut shell biochar (PS) | 243.30 | 10–500 | 5–10 h | ≈7 | 25–50 | Gao et al., 2015 |
| NaOH modified PS (mPS) | 313.90 | 10–500 | 5–10 h | ≈7 | 25–50 | Liu et al., 2016 |
| Maple wood biochar (MW) | 0.46–0.87 | 0–100 | 16 h | - | - | Wang et al., 2016 |
| H2O2 oxidized MW | 1.35–7.23 | 0–100 | 16 h | - | - | Wang et al., 2016 |
| Rice husk biochar | 39.80 | 250–1400 | 96 h | 5~8 | 25–45 | Kizito et al., 2014 |
| Poulty litter biochar (water washed) | 1.33 | 0–10 | 24 h | ≈7 | - | Tian et al., 2016 |
| Bentonite hydrochar | 23.67 | 200 | 25 h | 6 | 30 | Ismadji et al., 2016 |