Literature DB >> 32422247

Healthcare costs and resource utilization associated with treatment of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

Guillaume Geri1, Damon C Scales2, Maria Koh3, Harindra C Wijeysundera4, Steve Lin5, Michael Feldman6, Sheldon Cheskes7, Paul Dorian8, Wanrudee Isaranuwatchai9, Laurie J Morrison10, Dennis T Ko11.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The management of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients requires the coordination of prehospital, in-hospital and post-discharge teams. Data reporting a comprehensive analysis of all costs associated with treating OHCA are scarce. We aimed to describe the total costs (and their components) related to the management of OHCA patients. PATIENT AND METHODS: We performed an analysis on a merged database of the Toronto Regional RescuNet Epistry database (prehospital data) and administrative population-based databases in Ontario. All non-traumatic OHCA patients over 18 years of age treated by the EMS between January 1, 2006, and March 31, 2014, were included in this study. The primary outcome was per patient longitudinal cumulative healthcare costs, from time of collapse to a maximum follow-up until death or 30 days after the event. We included all available cost sectors, from the perspective of the health system payer. We used multivariable generalized linear models with a logarithmic link and a gamma distribution to determine predictors of healthcare costs.
RESULTS: 25,826/44,637 patients were treated by EMS services for an OHCA (mostly male 64.4%, mean age 70.1). 11,727 (45%) were pronounced dead on scene, 8359 (32%) died in the emergency department, 3640 (14%) were admitted to hospital but died before day-30, and 2100 (8.1%) were still alive at day-30. Total cost was $690 [interquartile range (IQR) $308, $1742] per patient; ranging from $290 [IQR $188, $390] for patients who were pronounced on scene to $39,216 [IQR 21,802, 62,093] for patients who were still alive at day-30. In-hospital costs accounted for 93% of total costs. After adjustment for age and gender, rate of patient survival was the main driver of total costs: the rate ratio was 3.88 (95% confidence interval 3.80, 3.95), 49.46 and 148.89 for patients who died in the ED, patients who died after the ED but within 30 days, and patients who were still alive at day-30 compared to patients who were pronounced dead on scene, respectively. Factors independently associated with costs were the number of prehospital teams (rate ratio (RR) 5.50 [5.32, 5.67] for being treated by 4 teams vs. 1), the need for hospital transfer (RR 2.38 [2.01, 2.82]), coronary angiography (RR 1.43 [1.27, 1.62]) and targeted temperature management (RR 1.25 [1.09, 1.44]).
CONCLUSION: Survival is the main driver of total costs of treating OHCA patients in a large Canadian health system. Inpatient costs accounted for the majority of the total costs; potentially modifiable factors include the number of prehospital teams that arrive to the scene of the arrest and the need for between-hospital transfers after successful resuscitation.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Costs; EMS services; Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest; Resources

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32422247     DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2020.04.032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Resuscitation        ISSN: 0300-9572            Impact factor:   5.262


  4 in total

1.  Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Intravascular Targeted Temperature Management after Cardiac Arrest in England.

Authors:  Mehdi Javanbakht; Atefeh Mashayekhi; Mohsen Rezaei Hemami; Michael Branagan-Harris; Thomas R Keeble; Mohsen Yaghoubi
Journal:  Pharmacoecon Open       Date:  2022-05-03

2.  Cost Analysis From a Randomized Comparison of Immediate Versus Delayed Angiography After Cardiac Arrest.

Authors:  Cyril Camaro; Judith L Bonnes; Eddy M Adang; Eva M Spoormans; Gladys N Janssens; Nina W van der Hoeven; Lucia S Jewbali; Eric A Dubois; Martijn Meuwissen; Tom A Rijpstra; Hans A Bosker; Michiel J Blans; Gabe B Bleeker; Rémon Baak; George J Vlachojannis; Bob J Eikemans; Pim van der Harst; Iwan C van der Horst; Michiel Voskuil; Joris J van der Heijden; Bert Beishuizen; Martin Stoel; Hans van der Hoeven; José P Henriques; Alexander P Vlaar; Maarten A Vink; Bas van den Bogaard; Ton A Heestermans; Wouter de Ruijter; Thijs S Delnoij; Harry J Crijns; Gillian A Jessurun; Pranobe V Oemrawsingh; Marcel T Gosselink; Koos Plomp; Michael Magro; Paul W Elbers; Peter M van de Ven; Jorrit S Lemkes; Niels van Royen
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 6.106

3.  "Do not resuscitate" order and end-of-life treatment in a cohort of deceased in a Norwegian University Hospital.

Authors:  Hans F L van der Werff; Torstein H Michelet; Olav M Fredheim; Siri Steine
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand       Date:  2022-07-14       Impact factor: 2.274

4.  Intensive care-treated cardiac arrest: a retrospective study on the impact of extended age on mortality, neurological outcome, received treatments and healthcare-associated costs.

Authors:  Ester Holmström; Ilmar Efendijev; Rahul Raj; Pirkka T Pekkarinen; Erik Litonius; Markus B Skrifvars
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2021-07-28       Impact factor: 2.953

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.