Morgann Loaec1, Adam S Himebauch2, Todd J Kilbaugh2, Robert A Berg2, Kathryn Graham2, Richard Hanna2, Heather A Wolfe2, Robert M Sutton2, Ryan W Morgan3. 1. Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, 3401 Civic Center Boulevard, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States. 2. Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, 3401 Civic Center Boulevard, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States. 3. Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, 3401 Civic Center Boulevard, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States. Electronic address: morganr1@email.chop.edu.
Abstract
AIM: To evaluate pediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) quality during intra-hospital transport to facilitate extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO)-CPR (ECPR). We compared chest compression (CC) rate, depth, and fraction (CCF) between the pre-transport and intra-transport periods. METHODS: Observational study of children <18 years with either in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) or out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) who underwent transport between two care locations within the hospital for ECPR and who had CPR mechanics data available. Descriptive patient and arrest characteristics were summarized. The primary analysis compared pre- to intra-transport CC rate, depth, and fraction. A secondary analysis compared the proportion of pre- versus intra-transport 60-s epochs meeting guideline recommendations for rate (100-120/min), depth (≥4 cm for infants; ≥5 cm for children ≥1 year), and CCF (≥0.80). RESULTS: Seven patients (four IHCA; three witnessed OHCA) met eligibility criteria. Six (86%) patients survived the event and two (28%) survived to hospital discharge. Median transport CPR duration was 7 [IQR 5.5, 8.5] minutes. There were no differences in pre- vs. intra-transport CC rate (115 [113, 118] vs. 118 [114, 127] CCs/minute; p = 0.18), depth (3.2 [2.7, 4.4] vs. 3.6 [2.5, 4.6] cm; p = 0.50), or CCF (0.89 [0.82, 0.90] vs. 0.92 [0.79, 0.97]; p = 0.31). Equivalent proportions of 60-s CPR epochs met guideline recommendations between pre- and intra-transport (rate: 66% vs. 57% [p = 0.22]; depth: 14% vs. 19% [p = 0.39]; CCF: 80% vs. 75% [p = 0.43]). CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric CPR quality was maintained during intra-hospital patient transport, suggesting that it is reasonable for ECPR systems to incorporate patient transport to facilitate ECMO cannulation.
AIM: To evaluate pediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) quality during intra-hospital transport to facilitate extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO)-CPR (ECPR). We compared chest compression (CC) rate, depth, and fraction (CCF) between the pre-transport and intra-transport periods. METHODS: Observational study of children <18 years with either in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) or out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) who underwent transport between two care locations within the hospital for ECPR and who had CPR mechanics data available. Descriptive patient and arrest characteristics were summarized. The primary analysis compared pre- to intra-transport CC rate, depth, and fraction. A secondary analysis compared the proportion of pre- versus intra-transport 60-s epochs meeting guideline recommendations for rate (100-120/min), depth (≥4 cm for infants; ≥5 cm for children ≥1 year), and CCF (≥0.80). RESULTS: Seven patients (four IHCA; three witnessed OHCA) met eligibility criteria. Six (86%) patients survived the event and two (28%) survived to hospital discharge. Median transport CPR duration was 7 [IQR 5.5, 8.5] minutes. There were no differences in pre- vs. intra-transport CC rate (115 [113, 118] vs. 118 [114, 127] CCs/minute; p = 0.18), depth (3.2 [2.7, 4.4] vs. 3.6 [2.5, 4.6] cm; p = 0.50), or CCF (0.89 [0.82, 0.90] vs. 0.92 [0.79, 0.97]; p = 0.31). Equivalent proportions of 60-s CPR epochs met guideline recommendations between pre- and intra-transport (rate: 66% vs. 57% [p = 0.22]; depth: 14% vs. 19% [p = 0.39]; CCF: 80% vs. 75% [p = 0.43]). CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric CPR quality was maintained during intra-hospital patient transport, suggesting that it is reasonable for ECPR systems to incorporate patient transport to facilitate ECMO cannulation.
Authors: Dianne L Atkins; Stuart Berger; Jonathan P Duff; John C Gonzales; Elizabeth A Hunt; Benny L Joyner; Peter A Meaney; Dana E Niles; Ricardo A Samson; Stephen M Schexnayder Journal: Circulation Date: 2015-11-03 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Akira Nishisaki; Matthew R Maltese; Dana E Niles; Robert M Sutton; Javier Urbano; Robert A Berg; Vinay M Nadkarni Journal: Resuscitation Date: 2012-02-04 Impact factor: 5.262
Authors: Corina Noje; Jennifer N Fishe; Philomena M Costabile; Bruce L Klein; Elizabeth A Hunt; Peter J Pronovost Journal: Pediatr Crit Care Med Date: 2017-10 Impact factor: 3.624
Authors: Sheldon Cheskes; Adam Byers; Cathy Zhan; P Richard Verbeek; Dennis Ko; Ian R Drennan; Jason E Buick; Steven C Brooks; Steve Lin; Ahmed Taher; Laurie J Morrison Journal: Resuscitation Date: 2017-02-24 Impact factor: 5.262
Authors: Robert M Sutton; Benjamin French; Dana E Niles; Aaron Donoghue; Alexis A Topjian; Akira Nishisaki; Jessica Leffelman; Heather Wolfe; Robert A Berg; Vinay M Nadkarni; Peter A Meaney Journal: Resuscitation Date: 2014-05-16 Impact factor: 5.262
Authors: Javier J Lasa; Parag Jain; Tia T Raymond; Charles G Minard; Alexis Topjian; Vinay Nadkarni; Michael Gaies; Melania Bembea; Paul A Checchia; Lara S Shekerdemian; Ravi Thiagarajan Journal: Pediatr Crit Care Med Date: 2018-02 Impact factor: 3.624
Authors: Brian Grunau; Takahisa Kawano; Frank X Scheuermeyer; Ian Drennan; Christopher B Fordyce; Sean van Diepen; Joshua Reynolds; Steve Lin; Jim Christenson Journal: Ann Emerg Med Date: 2019-06-24 Impact factor: 5.721
Authors: Robert M Sutton; Benjamin French; Akira Nishisaki; Dana E Niles; Matthew R Maltese; Lori Boyle; Mette Stavland; Joar Eilevstjønn; Kristy B Arbogast; Robert A Berg; Vinay M Nadkarni Journal: Resuscitation Date: 2012-09-06 Impact factor: 5.262
Authors: Arezoo Ghavi; Hadi Hassankhani; Kelly Powers; Mohammad Arshadi-Bostanabad; Hossein Namdar Areshtanab; Mohammad Heidarzadeh Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2022-05-24 Impact factor: 3.006