Literature DB >> 32421445

Measuring and Modeling Visual Appearance.

Laurence T Maloney1, Kenneth Knoblauch2,3.   

Abstract

In studying visual perception, we seek to develop models of processing that accurately predict perceptual judgments. Much of this work is focused on judgments of discrimination, and there is a large literature concerning models of visual discrimination. There are, however, non-threshold visual judgments, such as judgments of the magnitude of differences between visual stimuli, that provide a means to bridge the gap between threshold and appearance. We describe two such models of suprathreshold judgments, maximum likelihood difference scaling and maximum likelihood conjoint measurement, and review recent literature that has exploited them.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MLCM; MLDS; diagnostics; maximum likelihood conjoint measurement; maximum likelihood difference scaling; proximity; scaling; suprathreshold

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32421445     DOI: 10.1146/annurev-vision-030320-041152

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Annu Rev Vis Sci        ISSN: 2374-4642            Impact factor:   6.422


  6 in total

1.  Numerosity Perception in Peripheral Vision.

Authors:  Min Susan Li; Clement Abbatecola; Lucy S Petro; Lars Muckli
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2021-11-03       Impact factor: 3.169

2.  Visual perception of texture regularity: Conjoint measurements and a wavelet response-distribution model.

Authors:  Hua-Chun Sun; David St-Amand; Curtis L Baker; Frederick A A Kingdom
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2021-10-15       Impact factor: 4.475

3.  How facial aging affects perceived gender: Insights from maximum likelihood conjoint measurement.

Authors:  Daniel Fitousi
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Maximum likelihood estimation of difference scaling functions for suprathreshold judgments.

Authors:  Emily S Teti; Terece L Turton; Jonah M Miller; Roxana Bujack
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2022-09-02       Impact factor: 2.004

5.  Linking perceived to physical contrast: Comparing results from discrimination and difference-scaling experiments.

Authors:  Christopher Shooner; Kathy T Mullen
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Conjoint measurement of perceived transparency and perceived contrast in variegated checkerboards.

Authors:  Guillermo Aguilar; Marianne Maertens
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 2.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.