Literature DB >> 32420702

Risk of malformation after ondansetron in pregnancy: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

Cyndie Picot1, Anick Berard1,2, Guillaume Grenet1, Emmanuelle Ripoche3, Michel Cucherat1,4, Judith Cottin1.   

Abstract

Ondansetron is increasingly used off label to treat nausea and vomiting during pregnancy. The main objective of this study was to evaluate the risk of major congenital malformations (MCM), cardiac defects and orofacial clefts associated with first trimester exposure to ondansetron using a meta-analytic approach. MEDLINE, ClinicalTrials.gov and Scopus were searched until November 2019. All comparative cohort and case-control studies on MCM, cardiac or orofacial defects and use of ondansetron during pregnancy were included. A team of paired reviewers independently extracted data using a proprietary collaborative WEB-based meta-analysis platform (metaPreg.org). Pooled odd ratios with corresponding 95% CIs were calculated using random effects models. From 214 records initially retrieved, 12 studies were included. Using all available information to date, first trimester exposure to ondansetron was found to be associated with an increased risk of (a) ventricular septal defects (VSD) (OR 1.11, 95% CI 1.00-1.23; p < .05; n = 6 studies; I2 = 0%) and (b) oral clefts (OR 1.22, 95% CI 1.00-1.49; p < .05; n = 4 studies; I2 = 0%). No significant association was observed for the risk of cleft palate but, when excluding the study that contributed to the study heterogeneity, we found an OR of 1.48 (95% CI 1.19-1.84; p < .01; n = 5 studies; I2 = 0%). No statistically significant association was found for MCM, overall cardiac malformations, atrial septal defects and cleft lip with or without cleft palate. Exploratory investigations of other malformations showed an increased risk of diaphragmatic hernia, hypoplastic left heart and "respiratory system anomalies."
© 2020 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cardiac defect; malformations; meta-analysis; ondansetron; orofacial cleft; pregnancy; systematic review

Year:  2020        PMID: 32420702     DOI: 10.1002/bdr2.1705

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Birth Defects Res            Impact factor:   2.344


  4 in total

1.  Risk of abnormal pregnancy outcomes after using ondansetron during pregnancy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xiao Cao; Mingyao Sun; QiuYu Yang; Qi Wang; Liangying Hou; Jing Wang; Yu Wu; Long Ge
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2022-09-02       Impact factor: 5.988

2.  Antiemetic treatment of hyperemesis gravidarum in 1,064 Norwegian women and the impact of European warning on metoclopramide: a retrospective cohort study 2002-2019.

Authors:  Hilde Erdal; Lone Holst; Kristine Heitmann; Jone Trovik
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2022-06-02       Impact factor: 3.105

Review 3.  Assessment of evidence on reported non-genetic risk factors of congenital heart defects: the updated umbrella review.

Authors:  Xiaoxia Peng; Chenghong Yin; Xiaolu Nie; Xiaohang Liu; Chen Wang; Zehao Wu; Zimo Sun; Jian Su; Ruohua Yan; Yaguang Peng; Yuxuan Yang; Chengrong Wang; Siyu Cai; Yali Liu; Huanling Yu; Qingqing Wu
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 3.105

4.  Ondansetron versus metoclopramide for managing hyperemesis gravidarum: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Ebraheem Albazee; Lina Almahmoud; Firas Al-Rshoud; Dima Sallam; Wardah Albzea; Rawan Alenezi; Saeed Baradwan; Ahmed Abu-Zaid
Journal:  Turk J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2022-06-27
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.