Literature DB >> 32420664

Midtrimester Ultrasound Predictors of Small-for-Gestational-Age Neonates.

Vishal Patel1, Karen Resnick1, Cynthia Liang1, Matthew Smith2, Haleh Sangi Haghpeykar1, Joan M Mastrobattista1, Manisha Gandhi1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether a specific estimated fetal weight (EFW) or abdominal circumference (AC) measurement percentile at the 18-to 24-week ultrasound (US) examination is associated with a small-for-gestational-age (SGA) neonate.
METHODS: A retrospective case-control study was conducted including women with uncomplicated singleton gestations who delivered a term SGA neonate identified as having a birth weight (BW) below the 10th percentile on the Olsen growth curve and had an 18- to 24-week US examination in our database. The study period was October 2011 to January 2018. A similar number of control charts were requested randomly over the same time with BW in the 10th to 90th percentiles, all which had an 18-to 24-week US examination in our database. After all neonates meeting BW criteria were identified, a chart review was performed to specifically evaluate biometric parameters from the US at 18 to 24 weeks to determine a potential correlation with the EFW percentile and AC percentile. Pregnancy, neonatal outcomes, and maternal demographic characteristics were collected.
RESULTS: A total of 549 term neonates with a BW below the 10th percentile, and 593 control term neonates with BW in the of 10th to 90th percentiles were reviewed. Our analyses revealed that the AC and EFW percentiles were poor predictors of BW (<10th percentile; areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves, 0.68 and 0.69, respectively). A similar low ability of AC and EFW to predict BW below the 5th percentile was noted.
CONCLUSIONS: (1) No tipping point or cutoff for the EFW or AC percentile at the 18- to 24-week US examination was identified to predict a term SGA neonate. (2) These data are helpful when counseling women in midgestation about specific parameters, their importance, and the potential need for follow up imaging.
© 2020 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biometric predictors; midtrimester ultrasound; small-for-gestational-age

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32420664     DOI: 10.1002/jum.15310

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Ultrasound Med        ISSN: 0278-4297            Impact factor:   2.153


  1 in total

1.  Prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonates at 33-39 weeks' gestation in China: logistic regression modeling of the contributions of second- and third-trimester ultrasound data and maternal factors.

Authors:  Danping Xu; Xiuzhen Shen; Heqin Guan; Yiyang Zhu; Minchan Yan; Xiafang Wu
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2022-08-25       Impact factor: 3.105

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.