| Literature DB >> 32420489 |
Dan Yedu Quansah1, Daniel Boateng2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This study investigated the associations between mother's dietary diversity score and dietary patterns during pregnancy and the odds of low birth weight at the Cape Coast Metropolitan Hospital in Ghana.Entities:
Keywords: Cape Coast; Diet; Dietary diversity score; Dietary patterns; Epidemiology; Low birth weight; Nutrition; Postnatal care; Public health
Year: 2020 PMID: 32420489 PMCID: PMC7217998 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03923
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Heliyon ISSN: 2405-8440
General characteristics of study participants according to neonatal birth weight.
| Variables | Frequency (N) | Percent (%) | Birth weight | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Low (n = 184) | Normal (n = 236) | ||||
| Age, years | |||||
| <20 | 16 | 3.8 | 6 (37.5) | 10 (62.5) | <0.0001 |
| 20-30 | 322 | 76.7 | 162 (50.3) | 160 (49.7) | |
| >30 | 82 | 19.5 | 16 (19.5) | 66 (80.5) | |
| Educational level | |||||
| No formal | 68 | 16.2 | 41 (60.3) | 27 (39.7) | <0.0001 |
| Primary/JHS | 157 | 37.4 | 69 (43.9) | 88 (56.1) | |
| SHS | 67 | 16.0 | 16 (23.9) | 51 (76.1) | |
| Tertiary | 128 | 30.5 | 58 (45.3) | 70 (54.7) | |
| Employment | |||||
| Yes | 289 | 68.8 | 114 (39.4) | 175 (60.6) | 0.0050 |
| No | 131 | 31.2 | 70 (53.4) | 61 (46.6) | |
| Marital status | |||||
| Single | 142 | 33.8 | 82 (57.7) | 60 (42.3) | <0.0001 |
| Married | 278 | 66.2 | 102 (36.7) | 176 (63.3) | |
| Monthly household income (GH¢) | |||||
| ≤300 | 215 | 51.2 | 109 (50.7) | 106 (49.3) | <0.0001 |
| 301-500 | 83 | 19.8 | 47 (56.6) | 36 (43.4) | |
| 500+ | 116 | 27.6 | 28 (24.1) | 88 (75.9) | |
| Birth order | |||||
| 1 | 236 | 56.2 | 124 (52.5) | 112 (47.5) | <0.0001 |
| 2 | 141 | 33.6 | 47 (33.3) | 94 (66.7) | |
| 3+ | 43 | 10.2 | 13 (30.2) | 30 (69.8) | |
| Parity | |||||
| 1 | 239 | 57.9 | 124 (51.9) | 115 (48.1) | <0.0001 |
| 2 | 106 | 25.2 | 25 (23.6) | 81 (76.4) | |
| 3+ | 75 | 17.9 | 35 (46.7) | 40 (53.3) | |
| Antenatal clinic attendance (n = 408) | |||||
| 1–4 times | 24 | 5.9 | 3 (12.5) | 21 (87.5) | 0.095 |
| 5–8 times | 245 | 60.0 | 36 (14.7) | 209 (85.3) | |
| >8times | 139 | 34.1 | 32 (23.0) | 107 (77.0) | |
| Smoking during pregnancy | |||||
| Yes | 32 | 7.6 | 10 (31.3) | 22 (68.8) | 0.028 |
| No | 388 | 92.4 | 61 (15.7) | 327 (84.3) | |
| Alcohol intake during pregnancy | |||||
| Yes | 44 | 10.7 | 12 (27.3) | 32 (72.7) | 0.028 |
| No | 368 | 89.3 | 53 (14.4) | 315 (85.6) | |
| Pre pregnancy BMI (kg/m2) | |||||
| Underweight (<18.50) | 10 | 2.4 | 12 (66.7) | 6 (33.3) | 0.0258 |
| Normal (18.5–24.99) | 59 | 14.1 | 85 (41.7) | 119 (58.3) | |
| Overweight (25.0–29.9) | 315 | 75.2 | 47 (39.5) | 72 (60.5) | |
| Obese (≥30) | 35 | 8.4 | 40 (50.6) | 39 (49.4) | |
| Gestational weight gain (Kg) | |||||
| <12 | 321 | 76.4 | 125 (45.2) | 176 (54.8) | 0.0220 |
| >12 | 89 | 21.2 | 29 (32.6) | 60 (67.4) | |
| Neonatal Sex | |||||
| Male | 306 | 72.9 | 166 (54.2) | 140 (45.8) | <0.0001 |
| Female | 114 | 27.1 | 18 (15.8) | 96 (84.2) | |
P-value were derived from chi-square test.
JHS meant subjects with educational level from grade 1–9 called the junior high school, SHS meant education level from grade 10–12 which is called the senior high school and Tertiary meant subject with a diploma or university degree and above.
Pre-pregnancy BMI meant body mass index before pregnancy.
Figure 1Figure 1 describes the distribution of infant birth weight categories (low vs. normal) according to maternal dietary diversity score (DDS) during pregnancy. The overall proportion of low birth weight (LBW) was 43.8%. The proportion of LBW was higher in women who had low DDS during pregnancy (60.7%) compared to women who had high DDS during pregnancy (39.6%) (p < 0.001).
Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of LBW risk according to DDS (N = 420).
| Dietary diversity score | OR (95%, CI) | P-value |
|---|---|---|
| Crude | ||
| Low | 2.35 (1.23–4.47) | 0.009 |
| Medium | 0.77 (0.42–1.44) | 0.424 |
| High (referent) | 1.00 | |
| Model 1 | ||
| Low | 1.99 (1.02–3.90) | 0.043 |
| Medium | 0.77 (0.41–1.47) | 0.442 |
| High (referent) | 1.00 | |
| Model 2 | ||
| Low | 2.14 (1.07–4.27) | 0.031 |
| Medium | 0.87 (0.45–1.69) | 0.687 |
| High (referent) | 1.00 | |
| Model 3 | ||
| Low | 4.29 (1.24–6.48) | 0.021 |
| Medium | 0.92 (0.28–2.96) | 0.892 |
| High (referent) | 1.00 | |
CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio; ref, referent.
Crude meant univariate unadjusted regression estimates.
Model 1: Adjusted for socio-demographic characteristics including age, education, employment, marital status and monthly income.
Model 2: Model 1 + birth-order of infant, parity of infant and number of ante-natal clinic (ANC) attendance.
Model 3: Model 2 + smoking, alcohol intake and supplement intake.
Figure 2Scree plot showing the eigenvalues of the three main dietary patterns from the principal components analysis.
Loading factors from factor analysis using varimax rotation.
| Factor loading | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Western | Traditional | Healthy or prudent | |
| Meat | 0.931 | ||
| Poultry products | 0.927 | ||
| Organ meat (liver, kidney) | 0.583 | ||
| Egg | 0.711 | ||
| Pork | 0.612 | ||
| Maize | 0.621 | ||
| Shell fish | 0.569 | ||
| Sorghum | 0.518 | ||
| Rice | 0.510 | ||
| Fish | 0.453 | ||
| Bread | 0.423 | ||
| Milk | 0.321 | ||
| Other vegetables | 0.311 | ||
| Green leaves | 0.819 | ||
| Fruits | 0.675 | ||
| Pumpkins | 0.505 | ||
| other fruits | 0.486 | ||
| Eigenvalues | 4.51 | 2.72 | 1.53 |
| % of variance explained | 19.78 | 12.65 | 12.30 |
Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling Adequacy = 0.660, Bartlett's Test of Sphericity. Chi-Square = 2254.851, P = <0.0001.
Odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of the odds of LBW according to the quartile (Q) of dietary pattern score.
| Dietary pattern | Q1 (n = 105) | Q2 (n = 105) | Q3 (n = 105) | Q4 (n = 105) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR (95%, CI) | OR (95%, CI) | OR (95%, CI) | |||
| Healthy | (ref) | ||||
| Crude | 1.00 | 0.64 (0.55–0.84) | 0.47 (0.35–0.72) | 0.33 (0.32–0.91) | <0.0001 |
| Model 1 | 1.00 | 0.60 (0.54–0.84) | 0.57 (0.53–0.94) | 0.45 (0.41–0.87) | <0.0001 |
| Model 2 | 1.00 | 0.44 (0.32–0.92) | 0.33 (0.31–0.62) | 0.38 (0.23–0.72) | <0.0001 |
| Model 3 | 1.00 | 0.33 (0.21–0.59) | 0.42 (0.36–0.84) | 0.23 (0.19–0.39) | <0.0001 |
| Traditional | |||||
| Crude | 1.00 | 0.30 (0.17–0.56) | 0.46 (0.26–0.81) | 0.26 (0.14–0.47) | 0.0020 |
| Model 1 | 1.00 | 0.16 (0.07–0.36) | 0.34 (0.16–0.70) | 0.18 (0.08–0.40) | <0.0001 |
| Model 2 | 1.00 | 0.14 (0.06–0.33) | 0.31 (0.14–0.70) | 0.15 (0.06–0.37) | <0.0001 |
| Model 3 | 1.00 | 0.13 (0.05–0.31) | 0.30 (0.13–0.68) | 0.14 (0.06–0.35) | <0.0001 |
| Western | |||||
| Crude | 1.00 | 0.71 (0.39–1.29) | 2.41 (1.36–4.26) | 1.71 (0.97–3.00) | 0.5310 |
| Model 1 | 1.00 | 0.79 (0.35–1.76) | 1.69 (0.73–3.88) | 1.13 (0.51–2.48) | 0.2270 |
| Model 2 | 1.00 | 0.77 (0.32–1.86) | 1.38 (0.57–3.32) | 1.31 (0.55–3.08) | 0.1560 |
| Model 3 | 1.00 | 0.75 (0.30–1.84) | 1.48 (0.60–3.60) | 1.73 (0.68–4.37) | 0.1580 |
CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio; ref, referent.
Crude meant univariate unadjusted regression estimates.
Model 1: Adjusted for socio-demographic characteristics including age, education, employment, marital status and monthly income.
Model 2: Model 1 + birth-order of infant, parity of infant and number of antenatal care (ANC) attendance.
Model 3: Model 2 + smoking, alcohol intake and supplement intake.