BACKGROUND: Up to 30% of thyroid nodules undergoing fine needle aspiration (FNA) yield an indeterminate result. Recent research efforts have suggested that nuclear morphometry and morphology may enhance the diagnostic accuracy of FNA as an objective adjunct. We applied nuclear morphometric analysis on a diverse cohort of patients to evaluate the association between nuclear morphometry and malignancy. METHODS: Forty-five randomly selected patients, who underwent thyroid surgery after an indeterminate FNA result (Bethesda III & IV) between 2012-2015, were reviewed. One hundred representative nuclei per FNA of a thyroid nodule were analyzed using ImageJ. Seven validated morphometric parameters were collected: nuclear area, perimeter, circularity, aspect ratio, roundness, and maximum/minimum Feret's diameter. L/S ratio was subsequently calculated. All 8 nuclear parameters were reported as averages with standard errors of the mean (SEM). A Student's t-test was used to assess the association of nuclear parameters with final surgical pathology. RESULTS: The mean age of all patients was 56.31±15.39 years, with female patients comprising 68.9% of the cohort. Twenty-two patients had malignant thyroid nodules. The mean perimeter of nuclei for the cohort was 18.48±0.45 µm, the mean area was 22.19±0.93 µm, and the mean maximum Feret's diameter was 6.67±0.13 µm. No significant differences in the 8 nuclear parameters were observed between the malignant and non-malignant groups. CONCLUSIONS: In the population examined, our results suggest that nuclear morphometry is not yet a tool of reliable diagnostic value in accessing malignant and non-malignant thyroid nodules. Further investigation is necessary to identify objective parameters that will enhance diagnostic accuracy of indeterminate FNA cytology to minimize the number of diagnostic thyroid surgery. 2020 Gland Surgery. All rights reserved.
BACKGROUND: Up to 30% of thyroid nodules undergoing fine needle aspiration (FNA) yield an indeterminate result. Recent research efforts have suggested that nuclear morphometry and morphology may enhance the diagnostic accuracy of FNA as an objective adjunct. We applied nuclear morphometric analysis on a diverse cohort of patients to evaluate the association between nuclear morphometry and malignancy. METHODS: Forty-five randomly selected patients, who underwent thyroid surgery after an indeterminate FNA result (Bethesda III & IV) between 2012-2015, were reviewed. One hundred representative nuclei per FNA of a thyroid nodule were analyzed using ImageJ. Seven validated morphometric parameters were collected: nuclear area, perimeter, circularity, aspect ratio, roundness, and maximum/minimum Feret's diameter. L/S ratio was subsequently calculated. All 8 nuclear parameters were reported as averages with standard errors of the mean (SEM). A Student's t-test was used to assess the association of nuclear parameters with final surgical pathology. RESULTS: The mean age of all patients was 56.31±15.39 years, with female patients comprising 68.9% of the cohort. Twenty-two patients had malignant thyroid nodules. The mean perimeter of nuclei for the cohort was 18.48±0.45 µm, the mean area was 22.19±0.93 µm, and the mean maximum Feret's diameter was 6.67±0.13 µm. No significant differences in the 8 nuclear parameters were observed between the malignant and non-malignant groups. CONCLUSIONS: In the population examined, our results suggest that nuclear morphometry is not yet a tool of reliable diagnostic value in accessing malignant and non-malignant thyroid nodules. Further investigation is necessary to identify objective parameters that will enhance diagnostic accuracy of indeterminate FNA cytology to minimize the number of diagnostic thyroid surgery. 2020 Gland Surgery. All rights reserved.
Entities:
Keywords:
Fine needle aspiration (FNA); indeterminate thyroid nodule; nuclear morphometry
Authors: David S Cooper; Gerard M Doherty; Bryan R Haugen; Bryan R Hauger; Richard T Kloos; Stephanie L Lee; Susan J Mandel; Ernest L Mazzaferri; Bryan McIver; Furio Pacini; Martin Schlumberger; Steven I Sherman; David L Steward; R Michael Tuttle Journal: Thyroid Date: 2009-11 Impact factor: 6.568
Authors: Robert L Ferris; Zubair Baloch; Victor Bernet; Amy Chen; Thomas J Fahey; Ian Ganly; Steven P Hodak; Electron Kebebew; Kepal N Patel; Ashok Shaha; David L Steward; Ralph P Tufano; Sam M Wiseman; Sally E Carty Journal: Thyroid Date: 2015-06-24 Impact factor: 6.568
Authors: Wesley H Giles; Reid A Maclellan; Atul A Gawande; Daniel T Ruan; Erik K Alexander; Francis D Moore; Nancy L Cho Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2014-07-30 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Astrid D Bakker; Richard T Jaspers; Victor J B van Santen; Jenneke Klein-Nulend Journal: Cell Biochem Biophys Date: 2022-01-24 Impact factor: 2.194