Literature DB >> 32419212

Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor in COVID-19: Is it stimulating more than just the bone marrow?

Tamara Nawar1,2, Sejal Morjaria1,2, Anna Kaltsas1,2, Dhruvkumar Patel3, Rocio Perez-Johnston4,2, Anthony F Daniyan5,2, Sham Mailankody6,2, Rekha Parameswaran7,2.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32419212      PMCID: PMC7276914          DOI: 10.1002/ajh.25870

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hematol        ISSN: 0361-8609            Impact factor:   13.265


× No keyword cloud information.
To the Editor:Granulocyte‐colony stimulating factor (GCSF) is routinely administered in cancer patients as prophylaxis or treatment of neutropenia. Although the safety profile of GCSF use in patients with symptomatic COVID‐19 disease is unclear, lung findings from autopsies of patients showed neutrophil extravasation in the alveolar space. It is known that severe cases of COVID‐19 have been reported to have a higher absolute neutrophil count (ANC)‐absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) ratio ; both reported findings raise questions about the appropriate timing of administering growth factors to neutropenic patients with SARS‐CoV‐2 infection. Although clear causal evidence of GCSF administration leading to worse outcomes in COVID‐19 patients does not yet exist, there are concerns regarding the potential for increased pulmonary inflammation and macrophage activation with GCSF use in this setting. Currently, there are no standardized treatments or medications available to treat COVID‐19, so it is crucial to identify factors such as GCSF that may lead to a more severe outcome in COVID‐19 patients. Herein, we describe three patients who received GCSF and developed severe disease from COVID‐19 within 72 hours of administration. All patients were admitted to the hospital in late March 2020 for symptomatic COVID‐19 infection, proven by qualitative RNA PCR assay. All three patients had a severe infection with SARS‐CoV‐2 and received hydroxychloroquine 400 mg twice a day for the first day, followed by 200 mg twice a day for four days, for a total five day course in accordance with hospital criteria that were in place at that time. Patient 1: A 65‐year‐old male with relapsed acute myeloid leukemia, on a regimen of azacitidine and venetoclax, with last dose one month prior to admission, had persistent neutropenia of one month duration prior to his admission for fever of 38.7oC and neutropenia. The ANC was 0.3 K/mcl and pulse oximetry was 99% on room air. Chest X‐ray performed on the day of admission (hospital day 0) showed diffuse bilateral patchy lung opacities (Supplementary Figure 1). Upon hospital admission, he was empirically treated with aztreonam and vancomycin and received 480 mcg of filgrastim (GCSF) subcutaneously (SC) for neutropenia. On hospital day 2 (twenty‐four hours after his dose of GCSF), the patient had worsening oxygen requirements necessitating intubation and transfer to the intensive care unit (ICU). Repeat chest X‐ray showed increased bilateral lung opacities (Supplementary Figure 1). Laboratory workup revealed an increase in ANC to 2.2K/mcL (Table 1).
TABLE 1

Demographics table outlining pertinent clinical characteristics, laboratory values and clinical course.

VariablePatient 1Patient 2Patient 3
Age – year653558
GenderMaleFemaleFemale
Weight kg98.460.8122.8
BMI kg/m2 29.122.146.8
ComorbiditiesHypertension, diabetes mellitus type 2, hepatitis CNoneObesity
Smoking historyNever smokerNever smokerNever smoker
Cancer type and stageMetastatic prostate cancer Relapsed acute myeloid leukemia on therapyDiffuse large B‐cell lymphoma status post autologous stem cell transplant 1/2020Invasive ductal breast carcinoma on doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide
COVID 19 symptomsFever, myalgias, dyspnea, diarrheaFever, coughFever

GCSF total dose

Dose day (480microgram vial)

4.8microgram/kg

Admission day

7.8microgram/kg

One dose each on days 5 + 8

3.9microgram/kg

One dose each on days 1 + 2

ANC (K/mcL)(Post dose 2)(Post dose 2)
Admission0.34.10.6
GCSF day (“Day 0”)0.30.67.5
Day +12.220.216.2
Day +24.818.110.2
Day +34.37.55.4
ALC (K/mcL)(Post dose 2)(Post dose 2)
Admission0.70.50.3
GCSF day (“Day 0”)0.40.40.1
Day +11.310.3
Day +20.90.80.6
Day +30.40.60.3
Anti‐infective treatment

Hydroxychloroquine

Aztreonam

Vancomycin

Hydroxychloroquine Piperacillin‐tazobactam

Hydroxychloroquine

Cefepime

Clinical Course

Day +1

Day +2

Day +3

Increasing hypoxia

Intubation

Shock, increasing hypoxia

(Post dose 2)

Shortness of breath

Hypoxia: 78% room air

Hypotension, no intubation

(Post dose 2)

Tachypnea 2L oxygen

Worsening hypoxia

Day +5 intubation

IL6 (pg/mL) 48h post ‐GCSF68.213.582.1
CRP (mg/dL) 48h post‐GCSF6.090.4915.45
D dimer (mcg/mL) 48h post‐GCSF0.360.320.66
IL‐10 (pg/mL) 48h post‐GSF164<926
Procalcitonin (ng/mL) 48h post G‐CSF0.120.030.4
Ferritin (ng/mL) 48h post G‐CSF2790562056

Normal range for above laboratory findings: IL6 [0‐16.4 pg/mL], CRP <10mg/dL, D‐dimer <0.50 mg/L, IL10 [4.8‐9.8 g/mL], Procalcitonin [0.10‐0.49 ng/mL], Ferritin [12‐300 ng/mL].

Demographics table outlining pertinent clinical characteristics, laboratory values and clinical course. GCSF total dose Dose day (480microgram vial) 4.8microgram/kg Admission day 7.8microgram/kg One dose each on days 5 + 8 3.9microgram/kg One dose each on days 1 + 2 Hydroxychloroquine Aztreonam Vancomycin Hydroxychloroquine Cefepime Clinical Course Day +1 Day +2 Day +3 Increasing hypoxia Intubation Shock, increasing hypoxia (Post dose 2) Shortness of breath Hypoxia: 78% room air Hypotension, no intubation (Post dose 2) Tachypnea 2L oxygen Worsening hypoxia Day +5 intubation Normal range for above laboratory findings: IL6 [0‐16.4 pg/mL], CRP <10mg/dL, D‐dimer <0.50 mg/L, IL10 [4.8‐9.8 g/mL], Procalcitonin [0.10‐0.49 ng/mL], Ferritin [12‐300 ng/mL]. On day 3 of hospitalization, he developed new atrial fibrillation and increasing vasopressor requirements. His ANC rose to 4.3K/mcL with rapidly rising ANC/ALC ratio. His hospital course was further complicated by recalcitrant shock, metabolic acidosis, and rising oxygen requirements. Discussion of goals of care with the family led to his terminal extubation. The patient expired on hospital day 12; on the day of death, the ANC/ALC ratio reached a maximum value of 11. Patient 2: A 35‐year‐old female, had mediastinal diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma who underwent autologous stem cell transplant in January 2020, was admitted for fever and dry cough. Upon admission, she was hemodynamically stable except for a fever of 38.1oC. Her oxygen saturation was 99% on room air. Workup on admission revealed a normal chest X‐ray and ANC of 4.1 K/mcL. During the first 2 days of hospitalization, the patient remained febrile, but otherwise hemodynamically stable and without an oxygen requirement. On hospital day 3, she developed worsening leukopenia with nadir ANC of 0.6 K/mcl. She remained febrile and was treated with piperacillin‐tazobactam empirically for fever and neutropenia. Chest X‐ray on day 3 revealed bilateral patchy lung opacities. On hospital day 5, she received a dose of GCSF 480 mcg SC and her ANC increased to 10.7 K/mcl 2 days later. The ANC decreased again to 0.6 K/mcl on day 12 of hospitalization for which she received a second dose of GCSF 480 mcg SC; the following day her ANC increased to 20.2 K/mcl. On day 14 (forty‐eight hours after her second dose of GCSF), the patient developed increasing shortness of breath with rapid oxygen desaturation (nadir 78% on room air) requiring oxygen supplementation via a non‐rebreather mask at 15 L/min. She had a rapidly rising ANC/ALC ratio in relation to clinical decline with maximal value of 22.63. Her chest CT revealed increased bilateral opacities at which time she also developed hypotension and tachycardia. Her oxygen requirements increased necessitating high flow oxygen. She slowly improved and was discharged on day 33 of hospitalization with a lower ANC/ALC ratio. Patient 3: A 58‐year‐old woman with invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast on doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (last dose 10 days prior to admission) was admitted with fever and neutropenia (ANC on admission 0.6K/mcl). On admission, she was febrile to 39.2oC She was hemodynamically stable with an oxygen saturation of 99% on room air. She denied cough, chest pain or shortness of breath on admission. She was treated with cefepime at 2 g every 8 hours for neutropenic fever. Chest X‐ray revealed faint bilateral opacities. She received GCSF at 480 mcg SC on the day of her admission. On day 2 of hospitalization, her ANC increased to 7.5 K/mcl but she still received a second dose of GCSF 480 mcg SC on this day. On hospital day 3, she became increasingly tachypneic (respiratory rate 30 breaths/minute) and was placed on 2 L oxygen by nasal cannula. Her laboratory workup revealed an elevation in her ANC to 16.5 K/mcl (hospitalization day 3) with a peak ANC/ALC ratio of 75. Repeat chest X‐ray demonstrated worsening bilateral multifocal opacities. On day 5 of hospitalization, she was transferred to the ICU for worsening respiratory distress and was intubated on the same day. On hospital day 7, she developed acute respiratory distress syndrome and multiple organ failure and remained intubated for twenty days. Chest X‐ray on day 13 revealed worsening lung findings. She was extubated on hospital day 25, and currently remains hospitalized but in stable condition. Later in her hospital course, she was noted to have a progressive decrease in the ANC/ALC ratio, correlating with clinical improvement in her respiratory symptoms. Data regarding outcomes in cancer patients with COVID‐19 infection across the world are evolving. Febrile neutropenia is a major risk factor for infection related morbidity in cancer patients. Increased morbidity and mortality have been described in COVID patients with cancer as well as in those with comorbid medical conditions. To our knowledge, this is the first report describing the course of COVID‐19 infection in selected cancer patients who received GCSF for neutropenic fever in the United States. All three patients developed a rising NLR >3 at 24 hours after GCSF administration. At 72 hours after administration of GCSF, all three patients had NLR >5 and suffered respiratory decline. The increase in ratio correlated with clinical decompensation as defined by worsening respiratory failure (Supplementary Figure 2). Of these, two patients with age >50 years and comorbid medical conditions developed decline severe enough to require mechanical ventilation. These two patients also had high IL 6 levels. Although increasingly described, the genesis of the cytokine release state in COVID‐19 remains poorly understood. Data from China has shown that in patients over age 49.5 years and with ANC/ALC ratio >3.3, 46.1% of COVID‐19 patients with mild disease will develop severe disease and that the mean time to such development is 6.3 days. This case series draws attention to the fact that GCSF can cause rapidly rising NLR ratio >3 within 24 hours of administration. In the setting of COVID‐19 illness, further rapid rise in neutrophilia with NLR ratio >5 may portend respiratory deterioration to the point of mechanical ventilation within the next 72 hours, especially in those patients who are older than age 50 and have comorbid medical conditions. Limitations exist in our case series. This represents only a small number of patients who specifically came to our attention because they declined within 72 hours after receiving GCSF. Another limitation is missing data points regarding pre GCSF IL6 and other such markers, as these laboratory investigations were not performed on patients who initially had normal oxygenation on room air at admission. Larger scale studies are needed to delineate the relationship between GCSF administration and progression of COVID‐19 infection from mild to severe stage in high risk patients. Figure S1 A i: Portable chest X‐ray performed the day of GCSF administration demonstrating right basilar and left mid lung patch opacities. A ii: A day after the administration the airspace opacities increased bilaterally. B i: Portable chest X‐ray performed two days prior to administration of GCSF demonstrating bilateral predominantly bibasilar patchy opacities. B ii and B iii: Axial and coronal images two days post GCSF administration, demonstrating peripheral and peribronchovascular airspace opacities predominantly in the lower lobes. C i: Portable X‐ray at day 0 of GCSF administration demonstrating faint right basilar opacity. C ii: day 4 post GCSF administration, bilateral patch opacities noted involving both upper and lower zones. C iii: Day 13 post administration, increased bilateral diffuse reticular and airspace opacities Click here for additional data file. Figure S2 Change in Absolute Neutrophil/Lymphocyte ratio (‘ANC/ALC Ratio’; y‐axis) over time (‘Days’; x‐axis). Day 0 corresponds to first G‐CSF administration. As noted in the three graphs, the increase in ratio correlates with clinical decompensation as defined by worsening respiratory failure. A , The ANC/ALC ratio in relation to clinical decline in patient 1. At time of death, ANC/ALC reached a maximal value of 11. B, The ANC/ALC ratio in relation to clinical decline, reaching a maximal level of 22.63 followed by symptomatic improvement when the ANC/ALC ratio decreased in patient 2. C, Peak ANC/ALC ratio of 75, 1 day after G‐CSF administration with progressive decrease in the ratio correlating with clinical improvement in respiratory symptoms Click here for additional data file.
  5 in total

1.  Dysregulation of Immune Response in Patients With Coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) in Wuhan, China.

Authors:  Chuan Qin; Luoqi Zhou; Ziwei Hu; Shuoqi Zhang; Sheng Yang; Yu Tao; Cuihong Xie; Ke Ma; Ke Shang; Wei Wang; Dai-Shi Tian
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2020-07-28       Impact factor: 9.079

2.  Patients with Cancer Appear More Vulnerable to SARS-CoV-2: A Multicenter Study during the COVID-19 Outbreak.

Authors:  Mengyuan Dai; Dianbo Liu; Miao Liu; Fuxiang Zhou; Guiling Li; Zhen Chen; Zhian Zhang; Hua You; Meng Wu; Qichao Zheng; Yong Xiong; Huihua Xiong; Chun Wang; Changchun Chen; Fei Xiong; Yan Zhang; Yaqin Peng; Siping Ge; Bo Zhen; Tingting Yu; Ling Wang; Hua Wang; Yu Liu; Yeshan Chen; Junhua Mei; Xiaojia Gao; Zhuyan Li; Lijuan Gan; Can He; Zhen Li; Yuying Shi; Yuwen Qi; Jing Yang; Daniel G Tenen; Li Chai; Lorelei A Mucci; Mauricio Santillana; Hongbing Cai
Journal:  Cancer Discov       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 39.397

3.  The diagnostic and predictive role of NLR, d-NLR and PLR in COVID-19 patients.

Authors:  Ai-Ping Yang; Jian-Ping Liu; Wen-Qiang Tao; Hui-Ming Li
Journal:  Int Immunopharmacol       Date:  2020-04-13       Impact factor: 4.932

4.  Targeting potential drivers of COVID-19: Neutrophil extracellular traps.

Authors:  Betsy J Barnes; Jose M Adrover; Amelia Baxter-Stoltzfus; Alain Borczuk; Jonathan Cools-Lartigue; James M Crawford; Juliane Daßler-Plenker; Philippe Guerci; Caroline Huynh; Jason S Knight; Massimo Loda; Mark R Looney; Florencia McAllister; Roni Rayes; Stephane Renaud; Simon Rousseau; Steven Salvatore; Robert E Schwartz; Jonathan D Spicer; Christian C Yost; Andrew Weber; Yu Zuo; Mikala Egeblad
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 17.579

5.  Hematological findings and complications of COVID-19.

Authors:  Evangelos Terpos; Ioannis Ntanasis-Stathopoulos; Ismail Elalamy; Efstathios Kastritis; Theodoros N Sergentanis; Marianna Politou; Theodora Psaltopoulou; Grigoris Gerotziafas; Meletios A Dimopoulos
Journal:  Am J Hematol       Date:  2020-05-23       Impact factor: 13.265

  5 in total
  18 in total

Review 1.  COVID-19 in Patients with Hematologic Malignancies: Clinical Manifestations, Persistence, and Immune Response.

Authors:  Ivan Gur; Amir Giladi; Yonathan Nachum Isenberg; Ami Neuberger; Anat Stern
Journal:  Acta Haematol       Date:  2022-03-02       Impact factor: 3.068

2.  Real-World Issues and Potential Solutions in Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Perspectives from the Worldwide Network for Blood and Marrow Transplantation and Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research Health Services and International Studies Committee.

Authors:  Ghada Algwaiz; Mahmoud Aljurf; Mickey Koh; Mary M Horowitz; Per Ljungman; Daniel Weisdorf; Wael Saber; Yoshihisa Kodera; Jeff Szer; Dunia Jawdat; William A Wood; Ruta Brazauskas; Leslie Lehmann; Marcelo C Pasquini; Adriana Seber; Pei Hua Lu; Yoshiko Atsuta; Marcie Riches; Miguel-Angel Perales; Nina Worel; Shinichiro Okamoto; Alok Srivastava; Roy F Chemaly; Catherine Cordonnier; Christopher E Dandoy; John R Wingard; Mohamed A Kharfan-Dabaja; Mehdi Hamadani; Navneet S Majhail; Alpana A Waghmare; Nelson Chao; Nicolaus Kröger; Bronwen Shaw; Mohamad Mohty; Dietger Niederwieser; Hildegard Greinix; Shahrukh K Hashmi
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2020-07-24       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Older patients with cancer and febrile neutropenia in the COVID-19 era: A new concern.

Authors:  Antonino C Tralongo; Martine Extermann
Journal:  J Geriatr Oncol       Date:  2020-06-18       Impact factor: 3.599

4.  Evidence-based management of COVID-19 in cancer patients: Guideline by the Infectious Diseases Working Party (AGIHO) of the German Society for Haematology and Medical Oncology (DGHO).

Authors:  Nicola Giesen; Rosanne Sprute; Maria Rüthrich; Yascha Khodamoradi; Sibylle C Mellinghoff; Gernot Beutel; Catherina Lueck; Michael Koldehoff; Marcus Hentrich; Michael Sandherr; Michael von Bergwelt-Baildon; Hans-Heinrich Wolf; Hans H Hirsch; Bernhard Wörmann; Oliver A Cornely; Philipp Köhler; Enrico Schalk; Marie von Lilienfeld-Toal
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2020-09-21       Impact factor: 9.162

5.  Machine learning predictive model for severe COVID-19.

Authors:  Jianhong Kang; Ting Chen; Honghe Luo; Yifeng Luo; Guipeng Du; Mia Jiming-Yang
Journal:  Infect Genet Evol       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 4.393

6.  Prolonged Self-Resolving Neutropenia Following Asymptomatic COVID-19 Infection.

Authors:  Shreya Desai; Javairia Quraishi; Dennis Citrin
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2021-07-18

7.  Preinfection laboratory parameters may predict COVID-19 severity in tumor patients.

Authors:  Alexander Kiani; Romina Roesch; Clemens M Wendtner; Frank Kullmann; Thomas Kubin; Thomas Südhoff; Marinela Augustin; Markus Schaich; Clemens Müller-Naendrup; Gerald Illerhaus; Frank Hartmann; Holger Hebart; Ruth Seggewiss-Bernhardt; Martin Bentz; Ernst Späth-Schwalbe; Peter Reimer; Ulrich Kaiser; Markus Kapp; Ullrich Graeven; Jens-Marcus Chemnitz; Jörg Baesecke; Helmut Lambertz; Ralph Naumann
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2021-06-13       Impact factor: 4.452

Review 8.  Improving Outcomes of Chemotherapy: Established and Novel Options for Myeloprotection in the COVID-19 Era.

Authors:  Gary H Lyman; Nicole M Kuderer; Matti Aapro
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 9.  G-CSF in tumors: Aggressiveness, tumor microenvironment and immune cell regulation.

Authors:  Ioannis Karagiannidis; Eralda Salataj; Erika Said Abu Egal; Ellen J Beswick
Journal:  Cytokine       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 3.926

10.  Clinical deterioration during neutropenia recovery after G-CSF therapy in patient with COVID-19.

Authors:  Muhanad Taha; Aditi Sharma; Ayman Soubani
Journal:  Respir Med Case Rep       Date:  2020-09-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.