Rahul S Dadwani1, Neda Laiteerapong2. 1. Pritzker School of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA. 2. Section of General Internal Medicine, University of Chicago, 5841 South Maryland Ave, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA. nlaiteer@medicine.bsd.uchicago.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This paper provides an overview of type 2 diabetes economic simulation modeling and reviews current topics of discussion and major challenges in the field. RECENT FINDINGS: Important challenges in the field include increasing the generalizability of models and improving transparency in model reporting. To identify and address these issues, modeling groups have organized through the Mount Hood Diabetes Challenge meetings and developed tools (i.e., checklist, impact inventory) to standardize modeling methods and reporting of results. Accordingly, many newer diabetes models have begun utilizing these tools, allowing for improved comparability between diabetes models. In the last two decades, type 2 diabetes simulation models have improved considerably, due to the collaborative work performed through the Mount Hood Diabetes Challenge meetings. To continue to improve diabetes models, future work must focus on clarifying diabetes progression in racial/ethnic minorities and incorporating equity considerations into health economic analysis.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This paper provides an overview of type 2 diabetes economic simulation modeling and reviews current topics of discussion and major challenges in the field. RECENT FINDINGS: Important challenges in the field include increasing the generalizability of models and improving transparency in model reporting. To identify and address these issues, modeling groups have organized through the Mount Hood Diabetes Challenge meetings and developed tools (i.e., checklist, impact inventory) to standardize modeling methods and reporting of results. Accordingly, many newer diabetes models have begun utilizing these tools, allowing for improved comparability between diabetes models. In the last two decades, type 2 diabetes simulation models have improved considerably, due to the collaborative work performed through the Mount Hood Diabetes Challenge meetings. To continue to improve diabetes models, future work must focus on clarifying diabetes progression in racial/ethnic minorities and incorporating equity considerations into health economic analysis.
Entities:
Keywords:
Cost-effectiveness; Economic simulation modeling; Health economic analysis; Mount Hood Diabetes Challenge; Type 2 diabetes
Authors: Michelle Tew; Michael Willis; Christian Asseburg; Hayley Bennett; Alan Brennan; Talitha Feenstra; James Gahn; Alastair Gray; Laura Heathcote; William H Herman; Deanna Isaman; Shihchen Kuo; Mark Lamotte; José Leal; Phil McEwan; Andreas Nilsson; Andrew J Palmer; Rishi Patel; Daniel Pollard; Mafalda Ramos; Fabian Sailer; Wendelin Schramm; Hui Shao; Lizheng Shi; Lei Si; Harry J Smolen; Chloe Thomas; An Tran-Duy; Chunting Yang; Wen Ye; Xueting Yu; Ping Zhang; Philip Clarke Journal: Med Decis Making Date: 2021-12-15 Impact factor: 2.749