Literature DB >> 32418965

Usefulness of the Simplified Frailty Scale in Predicting Risk of Readmission or Mortality in Elderly Patients Hospitalized with Cardiovascular Disease.

Keita Aida1, Kentaro Kamiya2, Nobuaki Hamazaki3, Ryota Matsuzawa4, Kohei Nozaki3, Takafumi Ichikawa3, Takeshi Nakamura1, Masashi Yamashita1, Emi Maekawa5, Minako Yamaoka-Tojo2, Atsuhiko Matsunaga1,2, Junya Ako5.   

Abstract

The simplified frailty scale is a simple frailty assessment tool modified from Fried's phenotypic frailty criteria, which is easy to administer in hospitalized patients. The applicability of the simplified frailty scale to indicate prognosis in elderly hospitalized patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD) was examined.This cohort study was performed in 895 admitted patients ≥ 65 years (interquartile range, 71.0-81.0, 541 men) with CVD. Patients were classified as robust, prefrail, or frail based on the five components of the simplified frailty scale: weakness, slowness, exhaustion, low activity, and weight loss. The primary endpoint was the composite outcome of all-cause mortality and unplanned readmission for CVD.Patients positive for greater numbers of frailty components showed higher risk of all-cause mortality or unplanned CVD-related readmission (P for trend < 0.001). Classification as both frail (adjusted HR: 3.27, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.49-7.21, P = 0.003) and prefrail (adjusted HR: 2.19, 95% CI: 1.00-4.79, P = 0.049) independently predicted the composite endpoint compared with robust after adjusting for potential confounding factors. The inclusion of prefrail, frail, and number of components of frailty increased both continuous net reclassification improvement (0.113, P = 0.049; 0.426, P < 0.001; and 0.321, P < 0.001) and integrated discrimination improvement (0.007, P = 0.037; 0.009, P = 0.038; and 0.018, P = 0.002) for the composite endpoint.Higher scores on the simplified frailty scale were associated with increased risk of mortality or readmission in elderly patients hospitalized for CVD.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiac surgery; Elderly people; Frail; Heart failure; Ischemic heart disease; Prefrail; Prognosis

Year:  2020        PMID: 32418965     DOI: 10.1536/ihj.19-557

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Heart J        ISSN: 1349-2365            Impact factor:   1.862


  3 in total

1.  Suppression of trimethylamine N-oxide with DMB mitigates vascular dysfunction, exercise intolerance, and frailty associated with a Western-style diet in mice.

Authors:  Vienna E Brunt; Nathan T Greenberg; Zachary J Sapinsley; Abigail G Casso; James J Richey; Nicholas S VanDongen; Rachel A Gioscia-Ryan; Brian P Ziemba; Andrew P Neilson; Kevin P Davy; Douglas R Seals
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2022-08-11

2.  Current Trends in Readmission Prediction: An Overview of Approaches.

Authors:  Kareen Teo; Ching Wai Yong; Joon Huang Chuah; Yan Chai Hum; Yee Kai Tee; Kaijian Xia; Khin Wee Lai
Journal:  Arab J Sci Eng       Date:  2021-08-16       Impact factor: 2.807

3.  Optimal cutoff values for physical function tests in elderly patients with heart failure.

Authors:  Keita Aida; Kentaro Kamiya; Nobuaki Hamazaki; Kohei Nozaki; Takafumi Ichikawa; Takeshi Nakamura; Masashi Yamashita; Shota Uchida; Emi Maekawa; Jennifer L Reed; Minako Yamaoka-Tojo; Atsuhiko Matsunaga; Junya Ako
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-04-28       Impact factor: 4.996

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.