Jeeyoo Lee1, Aesun Shin2, Sooyoung Cho3, Ji-Yeob Choi4, Daehee Kang5, Jong-Koo Lee6. 1. Department of Preventive Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. Electronic address: jeeyoo@snu.ac.kr. 2. Department of Preventive Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea. Electronic address: shinaesun@snu.ac.kr. 3. Department of Preventive Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. Electronic address: ssooy7@snu.ac.kr. 4. Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Department of Biomedical Science, Seoul National University Graduate School, Seoul, Republic of Korea. Electronic address: miso77@snu.ac.kr. 5. Department of Preventive Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Department of Biomedical Science, Seoul National University Graduate School, Seoul, Republic of Korea. Electronic address: dhkang@snu.ac.kr. 6. JW LEE Center for Global Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Department of Family Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Seoul Center for Infectious Disease Control, Seoul, Republic of Korea. Electronic address: docmohw@snu.ac.kr.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Previous studies have reported on marital status and the prevalence of obesity; however, few studies have assessed the prevalence of underweight in relation to marital status. This study aimed to explore the association of obesity and abdominal obesity with marital status among Koreans aged 40-69 years. METHODS: We selected a total of 137,608 participants from the Health Examinees Gem Study for the final analysis. Multinomial logistic regression models were used to estimate odds ratios (OR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the association of obesity with marital status, with controlling for potential confounders. RESULTS: The prevalence of underweight was higher in unmarried men (OR: 1.82, 95% CI: 1.25-2.63) and women (OR: 2.16, 95% CI: 1.79-2.61) than in married individuals. Compared to married individuals, a lower prevalence of BMI≥25kg/m2 was observed for those who were unmarried (men: OR: 0.71, 95% CI: 0.62-0.81, women: OR: 0.65, 95% CI: 0.58-0.73) or divorced/separated (men: OR: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.69-0.93, women: OR: 0.90, 95% CI: 0.83-0.98). Interestingly, widowed women showed higher prevalence of BMI≥25kg/m2 (OR: 1.17, 95% CI: 1.10-1.25) and abdominal obesity (OR: 1.23, 95% CI: 1.16-1.30) compared to married women, and the association persisted only among women in their 50s and 60s. CONCLUSIONS: Married participants showed a higher prevalence of obesity and abdominal obesity than those in other marriage categories except for widowed women.
OBJECTIVE: Previous studies have reported on marital status and the prevalence of obesity; however, few studies have assessed the prevalence of underweight in relation to marital status. This study aimed to explore the association of obesity and abdominal obesity with marital status among Koreans aged 40-69 years. METHODS: We selected a total of 137,608 participants from the Health Examinees Gem Study for the final analysis. Multinomial logistic regression models were used to estimate odds ratios (OR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the association of obesity with marital status, with controlling for potential confounders. RESULTS: The prevalence of underweight was higher in unmarried men (OR: 1.82, 95% CI: 1.25-2.63) and women (OR: 2.16, 95% CI: 1.79-2.61) than in married individuals. Compared to married individuals, a lower prevalence of BMI≥25kg/m2 was observed for those who were unmarried (men: OR: 0.71, 95% CI: 0.62-0.81, women: OR: 0.65, 95% CI: 0.58-0.73) or divorced/separated (men: OR: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.69-0.93, women: OR: 0.90, 95% CI: 0.83-0.98). Interestingly, widowed women showed higher prevalence of BMI≥25kg/m2 (OR: 1.17, 95% CI: 1.10-1.25) and abdominal obesity (OR: 1.23, 95% CI: 1.16-1.30) compared to married women, and the association persisted only among women in their 50s and 60s. CONCLUSIONS: Married participants showed a higher prevalence of obesity and abdominal obesity than those in other marriage categories except for widowed women.
Authors: Aaron K Christian; Matilda Steiner-Asiedu; Helena J Bentil; Fabian Rohner; Rita Wegmüller; Nicolai Petry; James P Wirth; William E S Donkor; Esi F Amoaful; Seth Adu-Afarwuah Journal: Nutrients Date: 2022-03-29 Impact factor: 5.717
Authors: Kamila Kholmatova; Alexandra Krettek; David A Leon; Sofia Malyutina; Sarah Cook; Laila A Hopstock; Ola Løvsletten; Alexander V Kudryavtsev Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-08-01 Impact factor: 4.614