Literature DB >> 32418270

#pandemicpedagogy: Using Twitter for knowledge exchange.

Gabrielle M Finn, Megan E L Brown, William Laughey, Angelique Dueñas.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32418270      PMCID: PMC7276845          DOI: 10.1111/medu.14242

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Educ        ISSN: 0308-0110            Impact factor:   6.251


× No keyword cloud information.

WHAT PROBLEMS WERE ADDRESSED?

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) pandemic has resulted in homeworking becoming the norm internationally. As a result, international, national and institutional medical education conferences, workshops and seminars have been cancelled or postponed indefinitely. Consequently, the opportunity for knowledge exchange and networking has been reduced. Hull York Medical School runs a Health Professions Education Unit (HPEU) with associated masters and PhD programmes that rely on conferences as opportunities for postgraduate students to learn from others in the field, showcase their research and innovative pedagogy, as well as network for future employment.

WHAT WAS TRIED?

In order to continue to develop and learn from the wider community, the medical education research unit at Hull York Medical School decided to build on its use of social media during COVID‐19 closures. In particular, Twitter (Twitter Inc., San Francisco, CA, USA) was utilised as a platform by which to engage the wider academic community in discourse around research and pedagogy. Two streams of work were undertaken: (a) the creation of short videos to showcase doctoral students’ work that would have been shared at conferences, and (b) the creation of a series of live Twitter chats (#pandemicpedagogy) to engage the wider community in an exchange of ideas around adapting teaching during the COVID‐19 pandemic. Trial chats were established before the development of a specific hashtag #pandemicpedagogy. Events were advertised through the medical education research unit's Twitter account and via associated societies. Guest moderators were invited from international institutions in order to facilitate a global discussion and to encourage a broader range of participants. Each event had a specific theme, such as anatomy, empathy, identity or clerkships. Timing for a global audience was the most significant obstacle; in light of this, the event timings were staggered, in order to facilitate international engagement. Due to some events occurring out of hours, electronic calendar invites were sent to invited moderators to ensure events remained on their radar. All guest moderators were publicly acknowledged for their contributions. The themed conversations were arranged each week of the university closure, with a different PhD student at the helm depending on their specialism. Participation ranged from 10 to 30 contributors per discussion.

WHAT WAS LEARNED?

Establishment of these events helped to boost the morale of the postgraduate students and staff within the medical education research unit. The focus on sharing and creating collective knowledge provided a sense of community during physical isolation from peers and colleagues. Uptake from moderators was high and feedback was overwhelmingly positive. Timing events was a barrier to maximising participation; however, where an audience in a particular time zone could not be accommodated, a repeat of the event was offered where possible. New collaborations were established as a result of the connections made. Discussions were stimulating and Twitter proved to be a fun and useful platform despite the limitations of character limits on individual tweets. Participants engaged in bursts of conversation, with multiple tweets in reply to each prompt or question. Numbering questions and prompts helped track replies and keep the discussion flowing. Lessons learned from early events included: having some tweets drafted ready to send to serve as discussion prompts; having moderators logged in on multiple devices in order to keep up with the speed of responses; recommending the use of TweetDeck (Twitter Inc., San Francisco, CA, USA) for a more easily coordinated moderation, and ensuring that the hashtags were used as frequently as possible to allow the audience to maintain a view of the content developed. Metrics such as new followers, likes, impressions and retweets demonstrated immediate impact. Students found conversations useful for thinking around their subject area. There was excitement, and ‘fangirling,’ when notable names in the field replied or retweeted ‐ this offered students a morale boost and was a good proxy for conference networking.
  3 in total

1.  Addressing the Covid-19 Burden on Medical Education and Training: The Role of Telemedicine and Tele-Education During and Beyond the Pandemic.

Authors:  Divyansh Sharma; Sonu Bhaskar
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2020-11-27

2.  Professional Development of Health Researchers During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Challenges and Prospects of Synchronous Online Learning.

Authors:  Hasnat Sujon; Md Nazim Uzzaman; Shakila Banu; Mohammod Rafiqul Islam; Mohammad Asaduzzaman; Armana Ahmed; Aftab Uddin; Mohammad Habibur Rahman Sarker
Journal:  J Contin Educ Health Prof       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 2.190

Review 3.  Faculty Development in the COVID-19 Era: A Rapid Systematic Review.

Authors:  Mahla Salajegheh; Roghayeh Gandomkar; Elaheh Mohammadi
Journal:  Med J Islam Repub Iran       Date:  2022-08-01
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.