Literature DB >> 32418044

Prediction of pathologic complete response using image-guided biopsy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients selected based on MRI findings: a prospective feasibility trial.

Han-Byoel Lee1,2,3, Wonshik Han4,5,6, Soo-Yeon Kim7, Nariya Cho7, Kyoung-Eun Kim1, Jung Hyun Park1, Young Wook Ju1, Eun-Shin Lee1, Sung-Joon Lim1, Jung Ho Kim8, Han Suk Ryu8, Dae-Won Lee9, Miso Kim9, Tae-Yong Kim9, Kyung-Hun Lee3,9, Sung Ui Shin7, Su Hyun Lee7, Jung Min Chang7, Hyeong-Gon Moon1,2, Seock-Ah Im3,9, Woo Kyung Moon2,7, In-Ae Park8, Dong-Young Noh1,3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Accurate prediction of pathologic complete response (pCR) in breast cancer using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ultrasound (US)-guided biopsy may aid in selecting patients who forego surgery for breast cancer. We evaluated the accuracy of US-guided biopsy aided by MRI in predicting pCR in the breast after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC).
METHODS: After completion of NAC, 40 patients with near pCR (either tumor size ≤ 0.5 cm or lesion-to-background signal enhancement ratio (L-to-B SER) ≤ 1.6 on MRI) and no diffused residual microcalcifications were prospectively enrolled at a single institution. US-guided multiple core needle biopsy (CNB) or vacuum-assisted biopsy (VAB) of the tumor bed, followed by standard surgical excision, was performed. Matched biopsy and surgical specimens were compared to assess pCR. The negative predictive value (NPV), accuracy, and false-negative rate (FNR) were analyzed.
RESULTS: pCR was confirmed in 27 (67.5%) surgical specimens. Preoperative biopsy had an NPV, accuracy, and FNR of 87.1%, 90.0%, and 30.8%, respectively. NPV for hormone receptor-negative and hormone receptor-positive tumors were 83.3% and 100%, respectively. Obtaining at least 5 biopsy cores based on tumor size ≤ 0.5 cm and an L-to-B SER of ≤ 1.6 on MRI (27 patients) resulted in 100% NPV and accuracy. No differences in accuracy were noted between CNB and VAB (90% vs. 90%).
CONCLUSIONS: Investigation using stringent MRI criteria and ultrasound-guided biopsy could accurately predict patients with pCR after NAC. A larger prospective clinical trial evaluating the clinical safety of breast surgery omission after NAC in selected patients will be conducted based on these findings.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer; Magnetic resonance imaging; Minimally invasive biopsy; Neoadjuvant therapy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32418044     DOI: 10.1007/s10549-020-05678-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  12 in total

1.  ASO Author Reflections: The Role of Imaging Modalities in Omitting Surgery in Breast Cancer Patients Receiving Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.

Authors:  Frederik K Palshof; Niels Kroman; Tove Filtenborg Tvedskov
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-05-22       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 2.  Innovative Standards in Surgery of the Breast after Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy.

Authors:  Tal Hadar; Michael Koretz; Mahmood Nawass; Tanir M Allweis
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-02       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 3.  A review of studies on omitting surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer.

Authors:  Kexin Feng; Ziqi Jia; Gang Liu; Zeyu Xing; Jiayi Li; Jiaxin Li; Fei Ren; Jiang Wu; Wenyan Wang; Jie Wang; Jiaqi Liu; Xiang Wang
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2022-08-15       Impact factor: 5.942

4.  Relationship Between Breast and Axillary Pathologic Complete Response According to Clinical Nodal Stage: A Nationwide Study From Korean Breast Cancer Society.

Authors:  Jai Min Ryu; Hee Jun Choi; Eun Hwa Park; Ji Young Kim; Young Joo Lee; Seho Park; Jeeyeon Lee; Heung Kyu Park; Seok Jin Nam; Seok Won Kim; Jun-Hee Lee; Jeong Eon Lee
Journal:  J Breast Cancer       Date:  2022-04       Impact factor: 2.922

5.  Prediction of Pathologic Complete Response in Breast Cancer Patients Comparing Magnetic Resonance Imaging with Ultrasound in Neoadjuvant Setting.

Authors:  Frederik Knude Palshof; Charlotte Lanng; Niels Kroman; Cemil Benian; Ilse Vejborg; Anne Bak; Maj-Lis Talman; Eva Balslev; Tove Filtenborg Tvedskov
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 5.344

6.  A qualitative study to evaluate physician attitudes regarding omission of surgery among exceptional responders to neoadjuvant systemic therapy for breast cancer (NRG-CC006).

Authors:  Laila A Gharzai; Lauren A Szczygiel; Dean A Shumway; Hanna Bandos; Thomas B Julian; Eleftherios P Mamounas; Julia White; Jennifer F De Los Santos; Mark Basik; Patricia A Ganz; Reshma Jagsi
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2021-03-19       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 7.  The Landmark Series: Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Triple-Negative and HER2-Positive Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Roberto A Leon-Ferre; Tina J Hieken; Judy C Boughey
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-01-23       Impact factor: 5.344

8.  Predicting Pathological Complete Response After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Advanced Breast Cancer by Ultrasound and Clinicopathological Features Using a Nomogram.

Authors:  Hao Cui; Dantong Zhao; Peng Han; Xudong Zhang; Wei Fan; Xiaoxuan Zuo; Panting Wang; Nana Hu; Hanqing Kong; Fuhui Peng; Ying Wang; Jiawei Tian; Lei Zhang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-11-23       Impact factor: 6.244

9.  Markers Associated With Tumor Recurrence in Patients With Breast Cancer Achieving a Pathologic Complete Response After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.

Authors:  Li-Yun Xie; Kun Wang; Hai-Lu Chen; Yan-Xia Shi; Yuan-Qi Zhang; Hao-Yu Lin; Yuan-Ke Liang; Ying-Sheng Xiao; Zhi-Yong Wu; Zhong-Yu Yuan; Si-Qi Qiu
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-04-20       Impact factor: 5.738

Review 10.  Breast and axillary surgery after neoadjuvant systemic treatment - A review of clinical routine recommendations and the latest clinical research.

Authors:  André Pfob; Joerg Heil
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2022-01-22       Impact factor: 4.254

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.