Literature DB >> 32417668

Tract-based analysis of target engagement by subcallosal cingulate deep brain stimulation for treatment resistant depression.

Darren L Clark1, Kara A Johnson2, Christopher R Butson3, Catherine Lebel4, David Gobbi5, Rajamannar Ramasubbu1, Zelma H T Kiss6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of subcallosal cingulate cortex (SCC) is a promising investigational therapy for treatment-resistant depression (TRD). However, outcomes vary, likely due to suboptimal DBS placement. Ideal placement is proposed to stimulate 4 SCC white matter bundles; however, no quantitative data have linked activation of these target tracts to response.
OBJECTIVE: Here we used the volume of tissue activated (VTA) and probabilistic diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) to quantify tract activation relating to response.
METHODS: DTI was performed in 19 TRD patients who received SCC-DBS. We defined clinical response as >48% reduction from baseline in the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale. Bilateral VTAs were generated based on subject-specific stimulation parameters. Patient-specific tract maps emanating from the VTAs were calculated using whole-brain probabilistic DTI. The four target tracts were isolated using tract-specific quantification and examined for overlap with DBS activated tissue.
RESULTS: Medial frontal and temporal projections were stimulated in all responders at 6 and 12 months. Individual tract-based generalized linear mixed model analysis revealed a significant tract-by-response interaction at both 6 (F(1,135) = 3.828, p = 0.001) and 12 (F(1,135) = 5.688, p < 0.001) months, with post hoc tests revealing a response-related increase in cingulum activation at 6 months (t(135) = 2.418, p = 0.017) and decrease in forceps minor activation at 12 months (t(135) = -2.802, p = 0.006).
CONCLUSIONS: A wider profile of white matter tracts, particularly to the medial frontal, was associated with DBS response. Cingulum bundle stimulation may promote early response and excess stimulation of the forceps minor might be detrimental. Our work supports prospective patient-specific targeting to inform personalized DBS.
Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Deep brain stimulation; Subcallosal cingulate; Targeting; Tractography; Treatment-resistant depression; White matter

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32417668     DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2020.03.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Stimul        ISSN: 1876-4754            Impact factor:   8.955


  4 in total

1.  Deep Brain Stimulation for Depression.

Authors:  Martijn Figee; Patricio Riva-Posse; Ki Sueng Choi; Lucia Bederson; Helen S Mayberg; Brian H Kopell
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 6.088

2.  Imaging versus electrographic connectivity in human mood-related fronto-temporal networks.

Authors:  Joshua A Adkinson; Evangelia Tsolaki; Sameer A Sheth; Brian A Metzger; Meghan E Robinson; Denise Oswalt; Cameron C McIntyre; Raissa K Mathura; Allison C Waters; Anusha B Allawala; Angela M Noecker; Mahsa Malekmohammadi; Kevin Chiu; Richard Mustakos; Wayne Goodman; David Borton; Nader Pouratian; Kelly R Bijanki
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2022-03-12       Impact factor: 9.184

Review 3.  Past, Present, and Future of Deep Brain Stimulation: Hardware, Software, Imaging, Physiology and Novel Approaches.

Authors:  Jessica Frey; Jackson Cagle; Kara A Johnson; Joshua K Wong; Justin D Hilliard; Christopher R Butson; Michael S Okun; Coralie de Hemptinne
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 4.003

4.  Personality changes with subcallosal cingulate deep brain stimulation in patients with treatment-resistant depression.

Authors:  Rajamannar Ramasubbu; Laina McAusland; Sanchit Chopra; Darren L Clark; Bettina H Bewernick; Zelma H T Kiss
Journal:  J Psychiatry Neurosci       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 6.186

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.