Literature DB >> 32416978

Randomized, assessor-blinded trial comparing highly purified human menotropin and recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone in high responders undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection.

Craig A Witz1, Gaurang S Daftary2, Kevin J Doody3, John K Park4, Yodit Seifu2, Vladimir I Yankov2, Patrick W Heiser5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of highly purified human menotropin (HP-hMG) and recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone (rFSH) for controlled ovarian stimulation in a population of patients predicted to be high responders.
DESIGN: Randomized, open-label, assessor-blinded, parallel-group, noninferiority trial.
SETTING: Fertility centers. PATIENT(S): A total of 620 women with serum antimüllerian hormone (AMH) ≥5 ng/mL. INTERVENTION(S): Controlled ovarian stimulation with HP-hMG or rFSH in a GnRH antagonist assisted reproductive technology (ART) cycle. Fresh transfer of a single blastocyst was performed unless ovarian response was excessive, in which all embryos were cryopreserved. Subjects could undergo subsequent frozen blastocyst transfer within 6 months of randomization. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Ongoing pregnancy rate (OPR) after fresh transfer (primary endpoint), as well as cumulative live birth, ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS), and pregnancy loss rates.
RESULTS: OPR/cycle start after fresh transfer was 35.5% with HP-hMG and 30.7% with rFSH (difference: 4.7%, 95% CI -2.7%, 12.1%); noninferiority was established. Compared to rFSH, HP-hMG was associated with significantly lower OHSS (21.4% vs. 9.7% respectively; difference: -11.7%, 95% CI -17.3%, -6.1%) and cumulative early pregnancy loss rates (25.5% vs. 14.5% respectively; difference: -11.0%, 95% CI -18.8%, -3.14%). Despite 43 more transfers in the rFSH group, cumulative live birth rates were similar with HP-hMG and rFSH at 50.6% and 51.5% respectively (difference: -0.8%, 95% CI -8.7%, 7.1%). CONCLUSION(S): In high responders, HP-hMG provided comparable efficacy to rFSH with fewer adverse events, including pregnancy loss, suggesting its optimized risk/benefit profile in this population. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02554279 (clinicaltrials.gov).
Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  GnRH antagonist; Highly purified menotropin; Menopur; high responders; recombinant FSH

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32416978     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.03.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  8 in total

Review 1.  Ovarian Stimulation in Assisted Reproductive Technology Cycles for Varied Patient Profiles: An Indian Perspective.

Authors:  Padma Rekha Jirge; Madhuri Milind Patil; Rohit Gutgutia; Jatin Shah; Mridubhashini Govindarajan; Varsha Samson Roy; Nalini Kaul-Mahajan; Faddy I Sharara
Journal:  J Hum Reprod Sci       Date:  2022-06-30

2.  Comparative effectiveness of recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone alfa (r-hFSH-alfa) versus highly purified urinary human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG HP) in assisted reproductive technology (ART) treatments: a non-interventional study in Germany.

Authors:  Klaus F Bühler; Robert Fischer; Patrice Verpillat; Arthur Allignol; Sandra Guedes; Emmanuelle Boutmy; Wilma Bilger; Emilia Richter; Thomas D'Hooghe
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2021-06-16       Impact factor: 5.211

3.  Economic evaluation of highly purified human menotropin or recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone for controlled ovarian stimulation in high-responder patients: analysis of the Menopur in Gonadotropin-releasing Hormone Antagonist Single Embryo Transfer-High Responder (MEGASET-HR) trial.

Authors:  Jared C Robins; Andrew F Khair; Eric A Widra; Michael M Alper; Winnie W Nelson; Eric D Foster; Anshul Sinha; Masakazu Ando; Patrick W Heiser; Gaurang S Daftary
Journal:  F S Rep       Date:  2020-11-10

4.  Oocyte stimulation parameters influence the number and proportion of mature oocytes retrieved in assisted reproductive technology cycles.

Authors:  Damla C Gonullu; David H McCulloh; LeRoy G Robinson; Cheongeun Oh; David L Keefe
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2021-06-14       Impact factor: 3.357

Review 5.  Influence of human chorionic gonadotrophin during ovarian stimulation: an overview.

Authors:  Johan Smitz; Peter Platteau
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2020-08-06       Impact factor: 5.211

6.  The Frequency of Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome and Thromboembolism with Originator Recombinant Human Follitropin Alfa (GONAL-f) for Medically Assisted Reproduction: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Erica Velthuis; Julie Hubbard; Salvatore Longobardi; Thomas D'Hooghe
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 3.845

7.  Recombinant Human Follicle-Stimulating Hormone Alfa Dose Adjustment in US Clinical Practice: An Observational, Retrospective Analysis of a Real-World Electronic Medical Records Database.

Authors:  Mary C Mahony; Brooke Hayward; Gilbert L Mottla; Kevin S Richter; Stephanie Beall; G David Ball; Thomas D'Hooghe
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-12-09       Impact factor: 5.555

Review 8.  Interplay Between mTOR and Hippo Signaling in the Ovary: Clinical Choice Guidance Between Different Gonadotropin Preparations for Better IVF.

Authors:  Kyriaki Papageorgiou; Eirini Mastora; Athanasios Zikopoulos; Maria E Grigoriou; Ioannis Georgiou; Theologos M Michaelidis
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-07-21       Impact factor: 5.555

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.