| Literature DB >> 32416830 |
Y N Zhang1, S Wang1, K C Li1, D Ruan1, W Chen1, W G Xia1, S L Wang1, K F M Abouelezz2, C T Zheng3.
Abstract
This study evaluated the effects of different dietary zinc (Zn) levels on productive and reproductive performance, egg quality, tibial characteristics, plasma biochemical and antioxidant indices, and zinc deposition in laying duck breeders. A total of 504 Longyan duck breeders aged 21 wk were randomly allocated to 6 treatments and fed a basal diet (Zn, 27.7 mg/kg) or that basal diet supplemented with Zn (as ZnSO4·H2 O) at 10, 20, 40, 80, or 160 mg Zn per kg of feed for 20 wk. Each group had 6 replicates of 14 ducks each. Dietary Zn supplementation affected (P < 0.05) the egg production, FCR, and shell thickness of laying duck breeders from 21 to 40 wk, and there was a quadratic (P < 0.05) effect between them. Dietary Zn supplementation affected (P < 0.05) and quadratically (P < 0.001) increased the breaking strength, density, and dry defatted weight of tibias. Alkaline phosphatase, calcium, phosphorus, total superoxide dismutase, glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px), and malondialdehyde (MDA) activities or content in plasma were affected (P < 0.05), and quadratically (P < 0.01) changed by dietary Zn levels. Dietary Zn supplementation affected (P < 0.01) and increased the Zn deposition in egg yolk (linear, P < 0.05; quadratic, P < 0.001) and tibia (linear, P < 0.05). The dietary Zn requirements, in mg/kg for a basal diet containing 27.7 mg/kg Zn, for Longyan duck breeders from 21 to 40 wk of age were estimated to be 65.4 for optimizing egg production, 68.6 for FCR, 102 for hatchling BW, 94.7 for eggshell thickness, 77.2 for tibial breaking strength, 81.4 for tibial density, 78.9 for tibial dry defatted weight, 69.5 for plasma GSH-Px activity, 72.4 for plasma MDA content, and 94.6 for Zn content in tibia. Overall, dietary Zn supplementation, up to 160 mg/kg feed, affected the productive performance, eggshell thickness, tibial characteristics, plasma antioxidant status, and Zn deposition of layer duck breeders. Supplementing this basal diet (27.7 mg/kg Zn) with 70 to 80 mg/kg additional Zn was adequate for laying duck breeders during the laying period.Entities:
Keywords: laying duck breeder; productive performance; tibial characteristics; zinc
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 32416830 PMCID: PMC7587828 DOI: 10.3382/ps/pez530
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Poult Sci ISSN: 0032-5791 Impact factor: 3.352
Dietary composition and nutrient levels of the basal diet.
| Ingredients | % | Nutrients | % |
|---|---|---|---|
| Corn | 53.2 | AME (MJ/kg) | 10.75 |
| Soybean meal | 29.3 | Crude protein (CP) | 18.02 |
| Wheat bran | 6.2 | Calcium | 3.65 |
| Limestone | 8.3 | Methionine | 0.45 |
| Salt | 0.3 | Lysine | 0.96 |
| DL-Methionine | 0.18 | Total phosphorus | 0.56 |
| Dicalcium phosphate | 1.5 | Available phosphorus | 0.40 |
| 50% choline chloride | 0.10 | Methionine + cysteine | 0.67 |
| Premix | 1.0 | Zinc (mg/kg) | 24.3 (27.7) |
| Total | 100.00 |
Provided per kilogram of diet: VA 12,500 IU; VD3 4,125 IU; VE 15 IU; VK 2 mg; thiamine 1 mg; riboflavin 8.5 mg; calcium pantothenate 50 mg; niacin 32.5 mg; pyridoxine 8 mg; biotin 2 mg; folic acid 5 mg; VB12 5 mg; Mn 100 mg; I 0.5 mg; Fe 60 mg; Cu 8 mg; Se 0.2 mg; Co 0.26.
The number in parentheses is analyzed value.
The concentrations of Zn in 6 treatment diets (mg/kg).
| Dietary Zn supplementation | Calculated | Analyzed |
|---|---|---|
| 0 (basal diet) | 24.3 | 27.7 |
| 10 | 34.3 | 35.7 |
| 20 | 44.3 | 47.1 |
| 40 | 64.3 | 62.4 |
| 80 | 104.3 | 106.1 |
| 160 | 184.3 | 183.4 |
Added as zinc sulfate monohydrate.
Effects of dietary zinc (Zn) supplementation on the productive (21 to 40 wk) and reproductive performance (36 to 37 wk) of duck breeders in the laying period.
| Zn supplemental level (mg/kg) | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variables | 0 | 10 | 20 | 40 | 80 | 160 | SEM | ANOVA | Linear | Quadratic |
| Productive performance | ||||||||||
| Egg production (%) | 81.2 | 85.7 | 88.8 | 90.0 | 84.9 | 82.6 | 0.83 | 0.006 | 0.323 | 0.046 |
| Average egg weight (g) | 64.4 | 64.9 | 65.2 | 64.9 | 65.0 | 64.4 | 0.22 | 0.882 | 0.650 | 0.595 |
| FCR (g:g) | 3.06 | 2.88 | 2.76 | 2.74 | 2.89 | 3.00 | 0.029 | 0.007 | 0.395 | 0.046 |
| Reproductive performance | ||||||||||
| Fertility (%) | 88.3 | 88.9 | 90.0 | 83.3 | 87.2 | 88.7 | 1.31 | 0.781 | 0.977 | 0.693 |
| Hatchability (%) | 89.1 | 85.1 | 90.0 | 88.5 | 85.1 | 87.4 | 0.93 | 0.551 | 0.624 | 0.741 |
| Hatchling BW (g) | 38.4 | 38.7 | 39.7 | 39.9 | 40.2 | 39.1 | 0.26 | 0.317 | 0.491 | 0.049 |
Mean of 6 replicates (14 ducks per replicate) per treatment.
FCR, feed conversion ratio; BW, body weight.
Effects of dietary zinc (Zn) supplementation on the egg quality of duck breeders in the laying period (21 to 40 wk).
| Zn supplemental levels (mg/kg) | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variables | Time | 0 | 10 | 20 | 40 | 80 | 160 | SEM | ANOVA | Linear | Quadratic |
| Eggshell thickness (mm) | 5 wk | 0.385 | 0.397 | 0.408 | 0.401 | 0.402 | 0.403 | 0.0016 | <0.001 | 0.064 | 0.018 |
| 10 wk | 0.397 | 0.399 | 0.408 | 0.409 | 0.411 | 0.407 | 0.0019 | 0.166 | 0.137 | 0.037 | |
| 15 wk | 0.387 | 0.399 | 0.406 | 0.402 | 0.402 | 0.401 | 0.0016 | 0.004 | 0.191 | 0.049 | |
| 20 wk | 0.384 | 0.393 | 0.394 | 0.392 | 0.396 | 0.395 | 0.0014 | 0.095 | 0.084 | 0.074 | |
| Mean | 0.388 | 0.397 | 0.404 | 0.401 | 0.403 | 0.402 | 0.0010 | <0.001 | 0.011 | <0.001 | |
| Eggshell breaking strength (N) | 5 wk | 45.3 | 48.7 | 48.8 | 47.0 | 44.6 | 48.9 | 0.55 | 0.057 | 0.617 | 0.332 |
| 10 wk | 43.8 | 42.8 | 44.2 | 43.4 | 41.7 | 41.8 | 0.40 | 0.353 | 0.063 | 0.163 | |
| 15 wk | 43.1 | 43.6 | 42.3 | 43.4 | 41.6 | 42.8 | 0.36 | 0.612 | 0.514 | 0.492 | |
| 20 wk | 37.9 | 42.0 | 38.7 | 38.6 | 39.7 | 38.1 | 0.42 | 0.047 | 0.354 | 0.568 | |
| Mean | 42.5 | 44.3 | 43.5 | 43.1 | 41.9 | 42.9 | 0.27 | 0.169 | 0.318 | 0.367 | |
| Eggshell ratio (%) | 5 wk | 10.0 | 10.2 | 10.5 | 10.1 | 10.3 | 10.2 | 0.055 | 0.250 | 0.674 | 0.755 |
| 10 wk | 9.66 | 9.47 | 9.74 | 9.92 | 10.0 | 9.63 | 0.061 | 0.102 | 0.650 | 0.028 | |
| 15 wk | 9.58 | 9.78 | 9.71 | 9.46 | 9.42 | 9.59 | 0.055 | 0.411 | 0.438 | 0.271 | |
| 20 wk | 9.11 | 9.54 | 9.31 | 9.32 | 9.41 | 9.32 | 0.057 | 0.417 | 0.793 | 0.693 | |
| Mean | 9.59 | 9.76 | 9.81 | 9.70 | 9.78 | 9.70 | 0.035 | 0.556 | 0.871 | 0.526 | |
| Albumen height (mm) | 5 wk | 6.92 | 6.59 | 6.47 | 6.33 | 6.61 | 6.84 | 0.086 | 0.361 | 0.559 | 0.217 |
| 10 wk | 6.27 | 6.20 | 6.27 | 6.33 | 6.19 | 6.51 | 0.088 | 0.928 | 0.374 | 0.594 | |
| 15 wk | 6.37 | 6.54 | 6.56 | 6.49 | 6.15 | 6.62 | 0.088 | 0.700 | 0.824 | 0.553 | |
| 20 wk | 6.21 | 5.79 | 6.01 | 6.11 | 6.05 | 5.98 | 0.086 | 0.839 | 0.895 | 0.980 | |
| Mean | 6.44 | 6.28 | 6.33 | 6.32 | 6.25 | 6.49 | 0.043 | 0.595 | 0.432 | 0.222 | |
| Yolk color | 5 wk | 4.83 | 5.00 | 4.78 | 4.94 | 4.78 | 5.17 | 0.061 | 0.419 | 0.169 | 0.209 |
| 10 wk | 4.83 | 5.17 | 5.33 | 5.33 | 5.33 | 5.50 | 0.092 | 0.414 | 0.095 | 0.175 | |
| 15 wk | 4.40 | 4.46 | 4.38 | 4.50 | 4.19 | 4.38 | 0.055 | 0.718 | 0.533 | 0.629 | |
| 20 wk | 4.47 | 4.30 | 4.18 | 4.53 | 4.42 | 4.53 | 0.052 | 0.297 | 0.222 | 0.478 | |
| Mean | 4.63 | 4.73 | 4.67 | 4.83 | 4.68 | 4.89 | 0.037 | 0.271 | 0.066 | 0.182 | |
| Haugh unit | 5 wk | 83.0 | 80.5 | 79.9 | 78.5 | 80.6 | 79.9 | 0.70 | 0.596 | 0.529 | 0.538 |
| 10 wk | 76.6 | 76.3 | 76.8 | 77.3 | 75.8 | 76.5 | 0.64 | 0.993 | 0.860 | 0.975 | |
| 15 wk | 77.2 | 77.9 | 79.8 | 78.7 | 77.0 | 79.2 | 0.53 | 0.623 | 0.645 | 0.849 | |
| 20 wk | 76.9 | 73.9 | 75.9 | 75.9 | 74.8 | 74.9 | 0.58 | 0.769 | 0.589 | 0.834 | |
| Mean | 78.5 | 77.2 | 78.1 | 77.6 | 77.1 | 77.6 | 0.305 | 0.791 | 0.612 | 0.599 | |
Mean of 6 replicates (5 eggs per replicate) per treatment.
Effects of dietary zinc (Zn) supplementation on the tibial characteristics of duck breeders in the laying period (21 to 40 wk).
| Zn supplemental levels (mg/kg) | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variables | 0 | 10 | 20 | 40 | 80 | 160 | SEM | ANOVA | Linear | Quadratic |
| Breaking strength (N) | 127 | 141 | 146 | 158 | 150 | 136 | 3.0 | <0.001 | 0.911 | <0.001 |
| Density (g/cm2) | 0.243 | 0.289 | 0.298 | 0.323 | 0.322 | 0.276 | 0.0068 | <0.001 | 0.562 | <0.001 |
| Dry defatted weight (g) | 2.47 | 2.73 | 2.86 | 2.94 | 2.98 | 2.65 | 0.069 | 0.003 | 0.707 | <0.001 |
| Length (mm) | 91.9 | 92.3 | 93.2 | 95.0 | 93.5 | 94.0 | 0.395 | 0.249 | 0.174 | 0.166 |
Mean of 6 replicates (2 ducks per replicate) per treatment.
Effects of dietary zinc (Zn) supplementation on the plasma biochemical and antioxidant indices of duck breeders (40 wk of age) in the laying period.
| Zn supplemental level (mg/kg) | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variables | 0 | 10 | 20 | 40 | 80 | 160 | SEM | ANOVA | Linear | Quadratic |
| TP (g/L) | 63.1 | 60.0 | 60.3 | 63.1 | 62.7 | 56.6 | 1.11 | 0.517 | 0.176 | 0.226 |
| ALB (g/L) | 20.0 | 17.7 | 18.7 | 19.5 | 20.0 | 16.9 | 0.42 | 0.132 | 0.156 | 0.100 |
| UA (μmol/L) | 307 | 278 | 336 | 311 | 273 | 325 | 13.1 | 0.724 | 0.781 | 0.773 |
| CRE (μmol/L) | 3.77 | 4.03 | 4.63 | 3.81 | 3.70 | 3.06 | 0.271 | 0.740 | 0.194 | 0.410 |
| AST (U/L) | 117 | 144 | 152 | 132 | 110 | 130 | 5.9 | 0.230 | 0.283 | 0.526 |
| ALT (U/L) | 31.8 | 33.8 | 37.5 | 34.4 | 30.6 | 36.1 | 1.15 | 0.547 | 0.729 | 0.772 |
| TB (μmol/L) | 16.7 | 16.2 | 15.1 | 15.6 | 11.2 | 11.7 | 0.74 | 0.114 | 0.009 | 0.019 |
| GLU (mmol/L) | 11.4 | 11.2 | 10.0 | 10.5 | 10.3 | 9.79 | 0.183 | 0.058 | 0.018 | 0.045 |
| TG (mmol/L) | 11.8 | 10.5 | 11.9 | 13.0 | 10.6 | 11.2 | 0.68 | 0.921 | 0.798 | 0.966 |
| TC (mmol/L) | 3.46 | 3.51 | 3.33 | 3.01 | 3.28 | 3.29 | 0.122 | 0.905 | 0.684 | 0.701 |
| HDL-C (mmol/L) | 2.02 | 2.22 | 2.13 | 1.98 | 1.82 | 2.14 | 0.054 | 0.327 | 0.819 | 0.203 |
| LDL-C (mmol/L) | 0.72 | 0.75 | 0.79 | 0.67 | 0.70 | 0.68 | 0.025 | 0.748 | 0.311 | 0.573 |
| ALP (U/L) | 133 | 166 | 174 | 174 | 149 | 274 | 13.9 | 0.049 | 0.005 | 0.009 |
| Ca (mmol/mL) | 6.91 | 6.65 | 6.16 | 6.63 | 3.43 | 2.82 | 0.307 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| P (mmol/mL) | 3.20 | 3.56 | 2.63 | 3.10 | 5.88 | 5.90 | 0.266 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| Antioxidant indices | ||||||||||
| T-AOC (U/mL) | 8.39 | 9.85 | 11.1 | 11.3 | 10.18 | 9.58 | 0.339 | 0.104 | 0.828 | 0.459 |
| T-SOD (U/mL) | 197 | 196 | 246 | 244 | 200 | 209 | 2.5 | <0.001 | 0.142 | <0.001 |
| GSH-Px (U/mL) | 95.6 | 104 | 120 | 130 | 116 | 92.3 | 2.6 | <0.001 | 0.046 | <0.001 |
| MDA (nmol/mL) | 10.1 | 8.80 | 7.85 | 6.23 | 7.97 | 8.82 | 0.265 | <0.001 | 0.778 | 0.002 |
TP, total protein; ALB, albumin; UA, uric acid; CRE, creatinine; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; TB, total bilirubin; GLU, glucose; TG, triglycerides; TC, total cholesterol; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; ALP, alkaline phosphatase; Ca, calcium; P, phosphorus; T-AOC, total antioxidant capacity; T-SOD, total superoxide dismutase; GSH-Px, glutathione peroxidase; MDA, malondialdehyde.
Mean of 6 replicates (2 duck samples per replicate) per treatment.
Effects of dietary zinc (Zn) supplementation on the Zn deposition in egg yolk, tibia, and blood of duck breeders (40 wk).
| Zn supplemental levels (mg/kg) | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variables | 0 | 10 | 20 | 40 | 80 | 160 | SEM | ANOVA | Linear | Quadratic |
| Zn content in yolk (mg/kg) | 31.7 | 33.6 | 33.0 | 33.3 | 35.9 | 34.7 | 0.34 | 0.005 | 0.016 | 0.065 |
| Zn content in tibia (mg/kg) | 316 | 314 | 353 | 366 | 379 | 361 | 6.2 | 0.002 | 0.012 | <0.001 |
| Zn content in blood (mg/kg) | 6.26 | 6.76 | 6.76 | 7.04 | 6.59 | 6.60 | 0.09 | 0.199 | 0.991 | 0.405 |
Mean of 6 replicates (2 ducks per replicate) per treatment.
Estimations of the dietary zinc (Zn) requirements based on quadratic regressions of egg production, FCR, hatchling BW, eggshell thickness, tibial breaking strength, density, dry defatted weight, and Zn content in tibial on dietary Zn supplemental levels.
| Items | Regression equation | R2 | Zn requirement (mg/kg) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Egg production (%) | Y = −0.0008X2+0.1101X+84.26 | 0.422 | 0.046 | 65.4 |
| FCR (g:g) | Y = 3.116 × 10−5 X2−0.0045X+2.944 | 0.471 | 0.046 | 68.6 |
| Hatchling BW (g) | Y = −0.0002X2+0.0431X+38.52 | 0.891 | 0.049 | 102 |
| Eggshell thickness (mm) | Y = −1.321 × 10−6 X2+2.634 × 10−4 X+0.393 | 0.587 | <0.001 | 94.7 |
| Tibial breaking strength (N) | Y = −0.0036X2+0.585X+133.2 | 0.744 | <0.001 | 77.2 |
| Tibial density (g/cm | Y = −1.051 × 10−5 X2+0.0018X+0.260 | 0.841 | <0.001 | 81.4 |
| Tibial dry defatted weight (g) | Y = −6.862 × 10−5 X2+0.0114X+2.574 | 0.864 | <0.001 | 78.9 |
| Plasma GSH-Px activity (U/mL) | Y = −0.0046X2+0.6729X+101.1 | 0.750 | <0.001 | 69.5 |
| Plasma MDA content (nmol/mL) | Y = 0.0004X2−0.061X+9.3545 | 0.557 | 0.002 | 72.4 |
| Zn content in tibia (mg/kg) | Y = −0.0074X2+1.4735X+314.2 | 0.888 | <0.001 | 94.6 |
Y is the dependent variable and X are the dietary Zn supplemental levels (mg/kg).
Dietary Zn requirement = X giving 95% of the maximal response (mg/kg).