| Literature DB >> 32416793 |
Chong Wang1, Susanne Elisabeth Pors1, Jens Peter Christensen1, Anders Miki Bojesen1, Ida Thøfner2.
Abstract
Apperantly healthy laying hens at the end of production (60 to 91 wk) were investigated for the occurrence of pathology and bacterial infections. In total, 7,477 hens from 15 flocks representing the following production systems: Enriched cages, barn housed layers, and organic/free range layers were necropsied. Indications of bacterial infection were investigated by bacteriological cultivation. The overall prevalence of lesions was 16.60%, including lesions of both infectious and non-infectious origin. The most prevalent lesions were bursitis presternalis (6.65%), reproductive tract lesions (e.g., salpingitis and/or peritonitis and/or oophoritis) (3.50%), serosal scarification (e.g., fibrotic adhesive peritonitis) 1.55%, and neoplasm 1.73%. Significant differences were observed between different production systems and/or flocks in the prevalence of reproductive tract lesions, bursitis presternalis, serosal scarification, skin infections, juvenile hens, and traumas/fractures. No significant difference was observed between different production systems in the prevalence of neoplasia, infection of septicemic etiology, and pododermatitis. In total, 3.4% of the hens were out of lay, with significantly higher rate in organic flocks. Infections of the reproductive tract were the most prevalent lesions with bacterial etiology in all productions systems. In total, 40% of the hens with lesions associated to the oviduct were out of lay and significant difference between production systems were observed. Escherichia coli was the most commonly isolated bacteria and in 90% of the cases they were isolated from the reproductive tract lesions. The second most prevalent bacteria was Gallibacteruim anatis. Significant difference in the prevalence of E. coli positive hens was observed between production systems (P < 0.05). In conclusion, the prevalence of reproductive tract lesions in apparently healthy end-of-lay laying was higher than indicated in previous reports. These findings support the previous suggestions that E. coli and G. anatis are the major pathogens causing reproductive tract lesions.Entities:
Keywords: bacteriology; laying hens; pathology; reproductive tract; subclinical infections
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 32416793 PMCID: PMC7587857 DOI: 10.3382/ps/pez569
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Poult Sci ISSN: 0032-5791 Impact factor: 4.014
Number of flocks and hens investigated in relation to production system.
| Number of flocks | Number of hens | Number of hens with lesions | Ratio of hens within lesion within production system (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Enriched cages | 5 | 2,497 | 434 | 13.74 |
| Barn housed | 5 | 2,500 | 374 | 14.96 |
| Organic | 5 | 2,480 | 433 | 17.46 |
| Total | 15 | 7,477 | 1,241 | 16.60 |
Chi square of the overall ratio of total lesions between production system; P = 0.0262.
Denotes production system in which the ratio of hens with lesions is significantly different to the other.
Overview on the distribution of lesions in end-of-lay hens in different production systems.
| Production system number/count (% within housing system) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lesion type | Enriched cages | Barn housed | Organic/Free range | Total |
| Infection in the reproductive tract | 71a(2.84%) | 78a(3.12%) | 113b(4.56%) | 262(3.50%) |
| Septicaemia | 0(0%) | 3(0.12%) | 5(0.20%) | 8(0.10%) |
| Focal necrosis liver/spleen | 1(0.04%) | 6(0.24%) | 6(0.24%) | 13(0.17%) |
| Endocarditis | 1(0.04%) | 2(0.08%) | 0(0%) | 3(0.04%) |
| Pododermatitis | 6(0.24%) | 8(0.32%) | 9(0.36%) | 23(0.31%) |
| Skin infection/abscess/cellulitis | 1a(0.04%) | 12b(0.48%) | 7a,b(0.28%) | 20(0.27%) |
| Amyloidosis | 0(0%) | 3(0.12%) | 2(0.08%) | 5(0.07%) |
| Scarification/serosal fibrosis abdominal organs | 31a(1.24%) | 61b(2.44%) | 24a(0.97%) | 116(1.55%) |
| Bursitis presternalis | 212a(8.49%) | 131b(5.24%) | 154b(6.21%) | 497(6.65%) |
| Tumor | 39(1.56%) | 38(1.52%) | 53(2.14%) | 130(1.73%) |
| Fatty liver | 1(0.04%) | 0(0%) | 3(0.12%) | 4(0.05%) |
| Liver rupture/haemorrhage | 1(0.04%) | 0(0%) | 0(0%) | 1(0.01%) |
| Cardiac failure | 3(0.12%) | 1(0.04%) | 3(0.12%) | 7(0.09%) |
| Emaciation | 6(0.24%) | 5(0.20%) | 2(0.08%) | 13(0.17%) |
| Uraemia/nephropathia | 4(0.16%) | 5(0.20%) | 5(0.20%) | 14(0.19%) |
| Egg bound | 0(0%) | 1(0.04%) | 0(0%) | 1(0.01%) |
| Cannibalism/vent pecking | 1(0.04%) | 0(0%) | 4(0.16%) | 5(0.07%) |
| Juvenile | 7a(0.28%) | 5a(0.20%) | 20b(0.81%) | 32(0.43%) |
| Trauma/fracture | 22a(0.88%) | 7b(0.28%) | 12ab(0.48%) | 41(0.55%) |
| Miscellanous non-infectious | 0(0%) | 1(0.04%) | 2(0.08%) | 3(0.04%) |
| Unfit for necropsy/heavy autolysis | 27a(1.08%) | 7b(0.28%) | 9b(0.36%) | 43(0.58%) |
| No lesions | 2,063(82.62%) | 2,126(85.04%) | 2,047(82.54%) | 6,236(83.40%) |
| Total | 2,497 | 2,500 | 2,480 | 7,477 |
Different superscript letter denotes a subset of Production system categories whose column proportions differ significantly (P < 0. 05).
Figure 1Scatter plot of flock prevalences (mean ± SEM) and variation for the most prevalent lesion types. Statistical difference (P < 0.05) within a production system is marked “a”
Overview on the distribution of reproductive tract lesion in relation to production system and on flock level.
| Production system | Total no. hens | Infection in the reproductive tract | Flock level | Salpingitis | Flock level | Salpingitis-peritonitis-oophoritis (SPO) | Flock level | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n | % | n | % | Chi square | n | % | n | % | n | % | n | % | ||
| Enriched cages | 2,497 | 71 | 2.84 ± 0.55 | 17 | 3.4 | 29 | 1.16 ± 0.26 | 5 | 1.0 | 42 | 1.68 ± 0.34 | 12 | 2.4 | |
| 21 | 4.4 | 10 | 2.0 | 11 | 2.2 | |||||||||
| 8 | 1.6 | 2 | 0.4 | 6 | 1.2 | |||||||||
| 17 | 3.4 | 7 | 1.4 | 10 | 2.0 | |||||||||
| 8 | 1.6 | 5 | 1.0 | 3 | 0.6 | |||||||||
| Barn house/aviary/floor | 2,500 | 78 | 3.12 ± 0.74 | 30 | 6.0 | 25 | 1.0 ± 0.13 | 5 | 1.0 | 53 | 2.12 ± 0.74 | 25 | 5.0 | |
| 13 | 2.6 | 3 | 0.6 | 10 | 2.0 | |||||||||
| 15 | 3.0 | 7 | 1.4 | 8 | 1.6 | |||||||||
| 10 | 2.0 | 5 | 1.0 | 5 | 1.0 | |||||||||
| 10 | 2.0 | 5 | 1.0 | 5 | 1.0 | |||||||||
| Organic/free range | 2,480 | 113 | 4.54 ± 1.38 | 38 | 9.7 | 26 | 1.04 ± 0.29 | 9 | 1.8 | 87 | 3.5 ± 1.21 | 39 | 7.9 | |
| 18 | 3.6 | 6 | 1.2 | 12 | 2.4 | |||||||||
| 14 | 2.8 | 7 | 1.4 | 7 | 1.4 | |||||||||
| 9 | 1.8 | 1 | 0.2 | 8 | 1.6 | |||||||||
| 24 | 4.8 | 3 | 0.6 | 21 | 4.2 | |||||||||
| Total | 7,477 | 262 | 3.51 ± 0.55 | 80 | 1.06 ± 0.13 | 182 | 2.43 ± 0.50 | |||||||
Chi square of the overall ratio of reproductive lesion between production system; Total reproductive tract lesions: P = 0.0020, Salpingitis alone: P = 0.8506, Salpingitis-peritonitis-oophoritis P = <0.0001.
Percentages expressed as mean ± SEM.
Denotes production system in which the ratio of lesions is significantly different to other production systems.
Figure 2Percentages of birds out of lay in flocks from different production systems and in birds with lesions associated with the reproductive tract (mean ± SEM). Bars denote statistical difference (P < 0.05) between production systems.
Overview on the bacteriology on hen level. Hens may have been sampled at more than one site (lesion or organ) and more than one bacterial species could be identified for a single hen, thus numbers of identified bacterial species may add up to more than number of sampled hens.
| Enriched cages | Barn housed | Organic | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total hens sampled for bacteriological investigation | ||||
| 2 | 4 | 2 | 8 | |
| 6 | 4 | 6 | 16 | |
| 1 | 5 | 4 | 10 | |
| 3 | 2 | 1 | 6 | |
| Other Gram + | 0 | 4 | 6 | 10 |
| Unknown spp./Unidentifiable | 2 | 0 | 3 | 5 |
| Mixed, unspecified | 3a | 26b | 9a | 36 |
| No growth/sterile | 57a,b | 40b | 69a | 166 |
Different superscript letter denotes a subset of Housing System categories whose column proportions differ significantly (P < 0. 05).
Other Gram positive bacteria identified were Enterococcus avium (3), Staphylococcus lentus (2), Staphylococcus equorum (2), Enterococcus faecium (1), Aerococcus viridans (1), and Listeria monocytogenes (1).