Literature DB >> 32416615

Ecosystems monitoring powered by environmental genomics: A review of current strategies with an implementation roadmap.

Tristan Cordier1, Laura Alonso-Sáez2, Laure Apothéloz-Perret-Gentil1, Eva Aylagas3, David A Bohan4, Agnès Bouchez5, Anthony Chariton6, Simon Creer7, Larissa Frühe8, François Keck5, Nigel Keeley9, Olivier Laroche9, Florian Leese10,11, Xavier Pochon12,13, Thorsten Stoeck8, Jan Pawlowski1,14,15, Anders Lanzén2,16.   

Abstract

A decade after environmental scientists integrated high-throughput sequencing technologies in their toolbox, the genomics-based monitoring of anthropogenic impacts on the biodiversity and functioning of ecosystems is yet to be implemented by regulatory frameworks. Despite the broadly acknowledged potential of environmental genomics to this end, technical limitations and conceptual issues still stand in the way of its broad application by end-users. In addition, the multiplicity of potential implementation strategies may contribute to a perception that the routine application of this methodology is premature or "in development", hence restraining regulators from binding these tools into legal frameworks. Here, we review recent implementations of environmental genomics-based methods, applied to the biomonitoring of ecosystems. By taking a general overview, without narrowing our perspective to particular habitats or groups of organisms, this paper aims to compare, review and discuss the strengths and limitations of four general implementation strategies of environmental genomics for monitoring: (a) Taxonomy-based analyses focused on identification of known bioindicators or described taxa; (b) De novo bioindicator analyses; (c) Structural community metrics including inferred ecological networks; and (d) Functional community metrics (metagenomics or metatranscriptomics). We emphasise the utility of the three latter strategies to integrate meiofauna and microorganisms that are not traditionally utilised in biomonitoring because of difficult taxonomic identification. Finally, we propose a roadmap for the implementation of environmental genomics into routine monitoring programmes that leverage recent analytical advancements, while pointing out current limitations and future research needs.
© 2020 The Authors. Molecular Ecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biodiversity; biomonitoring; ecosystem management; environmental DNA; implementation strategy; metabarcoding

Year:  2020        PMID: 32416615     DOI: 10.1111/mec.15472

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Ecol        ISSN: 0962-1083            Impact factor:   6.185


  13 in total

1.  Metagenomics versus total RNA sequencing: most accurate data-processing tools, microbial identification accuracy and perspectives for ecological assessments.

Authors:  Christopher A Hempel; Natalie Wright; Julia Harvie; Jose S Hleap; Sarah J Adamowicz; Dirk Steinke
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2022-08-18       Impact factor: 19.160

2.  Applying convolutional neural networks to speed up environmental DNA annotation in a highly diverse ecosystem.

Authors:  Benjamin Flück; Laëtitia Mathon; Stéphanie Manel; Alice Valentini; Tony Dejean; Camille Albouy; David Mouillot; Wilfried Thuiller; Jérôme Murienne; Sébastien Brosse; Loïc Pellissier
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-17       Impact factor: 4.996

3.  Combining ecological, eco-cultural, and environmental justice parameters to create Eco-EJ indicators to monitor cultural and environmental justices for diverse communities around contaminated sites.

Authors:  Joanna Burger; Michael Gochfeld; David S Kosson; Kevin G Brown; Jennifer Salisbury; Michael Greenberg; Christian Jeitner
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2022-02-12       Impact factor: 3.307

4.  Cross-ocean patterns and processes in fish biodiversity on coral reefs through the lens of eDNA metabarcoding.

Authors:  Laetitia Mathon; Virginie Marques; David Mouillot; Camille Albouy; Marco Andrello; Florian Baletaud; Giomar H Borrero-Pérez; Tony Dejean; Graham J Edgar; Jonathan Grondin; Pierre-Edouard Guerin; Régis Hocdé; Jean-Baptiste Juhel; Eva Maire; Gael Mariani; Matthew McLean; Andrea Polanco F; Laurent Pouyaud; Rick D Stuart-Smith; Hagi Yulia Sugeha; Alice Valentini; Laurent Vigliola; Indra B Vimono; Loïc Pellissier; Stéphanie Manel
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2022-04-20       Impact factor: 5.530

5.  ExTaxsI: an exploration tool of biodiversity molecular data.

Authors:  Giulia Agostinetto; Alberto Brusati; Anna Sandionigi; Adam Chahed; Elena Parladori; Bachir Balech; Antonia Bruno; Dario Pescini; Maurizio Casiraghi
Journal:  Gigascience       Date:  2022-01-25       Impact factor: 6.524

6.  Genomic basis for an informed conservation management of Pelophylax water frogs in Luxembourg.

Authors:  Hannah Weigand; Jennifer Cross Lopez de Llergo; Alain C Frantz
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-04-11       Impact factor: 2.912

Review 7.  Interfacing Machine Learning and Microbial Omics: A Promising Means to Address Environmental Challenges.

Authors:  James M W R McElhinney; Mary Krystelle Catacutan; Aurelie Mawart; Ayesha Hasan; Jorge Dias
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-04-25       Impact factor: 6.064

8.  Molecular biology for green recovery-A call for action.

Authors:  Marta Rodríguez-Martínez; Jens Nielsen; Sam Dupont; Jessica Vamathevan; Beverley J Glover; Lindsey C Crosswell; Brendan Rouse; Ben F Luisi; Chris Bowler; Susan M Gasser; Detlev Arendt; Tobias J Erb; Victor de Lorenzo; Edith Heard; Kiran Raosaheb Patil
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 8.029

9.  Bacterial Indicators Are Ubiquitous Members of Pelagic Microbiome in Anthropogenically Impacted Coastal Ecosystem.

Authors:  Neža Orel; Eduard Fadeev; Katja Klun; Matjaž Ličer; Tinkara Tinta; Valentina Turk
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-01-17       Impact factor: 5.640

10.  Comparative Metagenomic Study of Rhizospheric and Bulk Mercury-Contaminated Soils in the Mining District of Almadén.

Authors:  Daniel González; Marina Robas; Vanesa Fernández; Marta Bárcena; Agustín Probanza; Pedro A Jiménez
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-03-07       Impact factor: 5.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.