Literature DB >> 32416318

Lung Ultrasound for Cardiologists in the Time of COVID-19.

Omid Kiamanesh1, Lea Harper2, Katie Wiskar3, Warren Luksun4, Michael McDonald5, Heather Ross5, Anna Woo6, John Granton7.   

Abstract

Lung ultrasound (LUS) is a point-of-care ultrasound technique used for its portability, widespread availability, and ability to provide real-time diagnostic information and procedural guidance. LUS outperforms lung auscultation and chest X-ray, and it is an alternative to chest computed tomography in selected cases. Cardiologists may enhance their physical and echocardiographic examination with the addition of LUS. We present a practical guide to LUS, including device selection, scanning, findings, and interpretation. We outline a 3-point scanning protocol using 2-dimensional and M-mode imaging to evaluate the pleural line, pleural space, and parenchyma. We describe LUS findings and interpretation for common causes of respiratory failure. We provide guidance specific of COVID-19, which at the time of writing is a global pandemic. In this context, LUS emerges as a particularly useful tool for the diagnosis and management of patients with cardiopulmonary disease.
Copyright © 2020 Canadian Cardiovascular Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32416318      PMCID: PMC7235628          DOI: 10.1016/j.cjca.2020.05.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Cardiol        ISSN: 0828-282X            Impact factor:   6.614


Lung ultrasound (LUS) is a useful point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) technique that outperforms lung auscultation and chest X-ray, and nears the diagnostic accuracy of chest computed tomography (CT) for common causes of acute respiratory failure. LUS offers the advantages of portability, availability, and avoidance of radiation exposure. It provides real-time diagnostic information and procedural guidance. Cardiologists can use LUS to enhance their physical and echocardiographic examination. We provide a practical overview of LUS for cardiologists.

How to Perform a Lung Ultrasound Examination

Device selection

We perform LUS with widely available cart-based and handheld devices (Supplemental Table S1).

Patient position

The optimal patient position for LUS depends on the suspected pathology. If pneumothorax is suspected, we prefer the supine position to allow pleural air to collect at the anterior chest wall. If a simple pleural effusion is suspected, we prefer the semirecumbent or supine position to allow pleural fluid to collect at the posterior costophrenic angle. If a person is prone, pleural air will collect dorsally, and pleural fluid will collect ventrally. If an interstitial syndrome or lung consolidation is suspected, patient positioning is less critical, because all lung zones must be examined.

Probe selection and knobology

We base probe selection on availability, pathology, and area of interest. High-frequency probes (8-12 MHz) provide excellent visualisation of superficial structures (eg, pleural line) but have a narrow sector width and poor visualisation of deeper structures. Curvilinear probes (3-5 MHz) provide good visualisation of both superficial and deep structures but have a larger footprint and may require angulation when scanning to avoid rib shadows. Phased-array probes (3-4.5 MHz) can show all lung findings and have a smaller footprint, making the avoidance of rib shadows easier, but provide less adequate visualisation of the pleural line. We disable features that decrease artefact production because LUS relies on interpreting artefacts. We optimise gain, focus, and depth for the structure of interest.

Scanning protocol

Several LUS protocols provide instructions on the systematic scanning of lung zones to identify the causes of respiratory failure. We describe the 6-zone (3 zones per lung) protocol for speed and simplicity; however, more comprehensive 8- and 12-zone protocols exist. , Six-zone LUS can provide a rapid and accurate assessment in most cases of acute respiratory failure. We examine the anterior, lateral, and posterior basal chest wall by 2-dimensional and M-mode imaging (Fig. 1 ). The angle of insonation must be perpendicular to the pleural line. Because the contour of the chest wall may differ from the underlying pleura, techniques such as sliding and fanning are essential to ensure ultrasound beam alignment. Failing to do so may cause false positive (eg, impression of an abnormal pleural line) or false negative (eg, failing to see A- or B-lines) findings. LUS clips should capture an entire respiratory cycle and should be stored for documentation.
Figure 1

A simple protocol for lung ultrasound scanning including 2-dimensional and M-mode lung ultrasound imaging of the anterior (A), lateral (L), and posterior basal (PB) lung zones. Lung ultrasound is performed bilaterally and may be followed by limited cardiac ultrasound and venous ultrasound if indicated.

A simple protocol for lung ultrasound scanning including 2-dimensional and M-mode lung ultrasound imaging of the anterior (A), lateral (L), and posterior basal (PB) lung zones. Lung ultrasound is performed bilaterally and may be followed by limited cardiac ultrasound and venous ultrasound if indicated.

Training and supervision

As with any imaging modality, the accuracy of LUS depends on operator skill. Learners may save and review images with experienced operators for supervised interpretation. All of the handheld devices discussed have this ability (Supplemental Table S1).

Cleaning and disinfecting devices

See “Cleaning and Disinfecting Devices During COVID-19” in the Supplementary Material.

Findings of Lung Ultrasound

LUS interpretation relies on characteristic normal and abnormal artefacts, because ultrasound waves do not transmit through gas-filled structures such as normal lung parenchyma.

Pleural line

Normal

The parietal pleura appears as a horizontal hyperechoic line a half centimetre below the rib line (Supplemental Fig. S1). A-Lines are reverberation artefacts produced by the interface between pleura and aerated lung. A-Lines appear as echogenic horizontal lines spaced at equidistant multiples of the transducer-pleural line (Supplemental Fig. S2; Video 1 , view video online). Lung sliding is the normal respirophasic horizontal to-and-fro movement of the parietal and visceral pleural sliding against each other (Video 2 , view video online). M-Mode imaging will show a stratified pattern of fixed subcutaneous tissue and parietal pleura with a heterogeneous “sandy pattern” below, termed the seashore sign (Supplemental Fig. S2). The lung pulse is the rhythmic movement of the visceral pleural along the parietal pleural with cardiac contraction and is a useful finding to rule out pneumothorax (Video 3 , view video online).

Abnormal

Abnormal pleural line findings include an irregular pleural line and the absence or impairment of lung sliding (Supplemental Fig. S1; Videos 4 and 5 , view video online). A lung point is an abrupt cessation of lung sliding that is pathognomonic of pneumothorax (Video 6 , view video online). It defines the margin of a pneumothorax, where pleural air transitions to parenchymal air. M-Mode imaging of a pneumothorax will show a stratified pattern of all structures, termed the barcode sign (Supplemental Fig. S2).

Pleural space

The pleural space is a potential space between the parietal and visceral pleura. It is normally not seen. Simple pleural effusions appear as an anechoic space bordered by the chest wall, diaphragm, and lung (Supplemental Fig. S3; Video 7 , view video online). M-Mode imaging will show respirophasic displacement from the pleural line, termed the sinusoidal sign. Complicated pleural effusions may show iso- or hyperechoic components, such as septations (Supplemental Fig. S3; Video 8 , view video online).

Parenchyma

Normal lung shows lung sliding with A-lines, as described above. A-Lines are produced by the interface of the pleura with air and may therefore be present in normal or abnormal lung that remains aerated (eg, pneumothorax, obstructive lung disease, pulmonary embolism; Supplemental Fig. S2). An interstitial pattern is characterised by multiple B-lines. The B-line is a well defined respirophasic vertical artefact that arises from the pleural line, extends to the bottom of the screen without fading in a hyperechoic comet-tail appearance, and erases A-lines (Supplemental Fig. S4). Two or fewer B-lines per intercostal space may be normal (particularly in dependent areas). More than 2 B-lines per intercostal space is abnormal and defines an interstitial process, which correlates with an interstitial pattern on a chest X-ray (Video 9 , view video online). Coalescent B-lines reflect a higher burden of disease and correlate with ground-glass opacities on chest CT (Supplemental Fig. S4; Video 10 , view video online). An alveolar pattern is characterised by consolidated, isoechoic lung. Consolidations and atelectasis can appear with the same echotexture as the liver, termed hepatisation (Supplemental Fig. S5; Video 11 , view video online). Consolidations are visible by LUS only if they reach the pleura. Consolidations may be translobar (involving an entire lung lobe) or nontranslobar. The border of nontranslobar consolidations with aerated lung is echogenic and irregular, termed the shred sign (Supplemental Fig. S5; Video 12 , view video online). Bronchograms may help differentiate pneumonia from atelectasis. Dynamic air bronchograms show respirophasic movement of at least 2 cm and suggest pneumonia, whereas static air bronchograms suggest pneumonia or atelectasis.

Cardiac and vascular ultrasound

Cardiac POCUS can complement LUS to enhance the diagnostic accuracy of causes of respiratory failure and to screen for concurrent cardiovascular conditions. Cardiac POCUS provides a real-time assessment of ventricular function, pericardial abnormalities, and gross valvular abnormalities. In patients with hypoxemic respiratory failure and normal LUS findings, vascular POCUS using a 2-point compression test may be useful to exclude venous thromboembolism.

Interpretation of Lung Ultrasound

LUS interpretation is quick and > 90% accurate for common causes of acute respiratory failure (Supplemental Table S2). A few concepts are of great value to the clinician. Pleural line abnormalities and impaired lung sliding are present in pneumothorax, inflammatory conditions (acute respiratory distress syndrome [ARDS], pneumonia), and fibrotic disease, but absent in heart failure (Table 1 ). B-Lines may be normal in dependent areas or lung fissures, but should not exceed 2 per intercostal space. B-Lines in a dependent, symmetric distribution, coupled with a smooth pleural line and bilateral simple pleural effusions, suggest heart failure. B-Lines in a patchy or asymmetric distribution with an irregular pleural line (with or without subpleural consolidations) suggest an inflammatory interstitial process, such as viral or atypical pneumonia, inflammatory lung disease, or early ARDS. Coalescent B-lines correlate with ground-glass opacities on chest CT and suggest a higher burden of disease. Bilateral dependent consolidations with associated simple pleural effusions suggest atelectasis. In contrast, unilateral consolidations (particularly if associated with dynamic air bronchograms or inflammatory B-lines) are more suggestive of an infectious process. Pulmonary embolism and obstructive lung disease typically present with a normal pleural line, normal lung sliding, and an absence of B-lines. We provide a simplified algorithmic approach to interpretation in Supplemental Figure S6.
Table 1

Lung ultrasound findings and associated conditions

DiagnosisLung slidingNormal pleural lineLung pointA-linesB-linesConsolidationPleural effusion
Normal+++
Pneumonia or ARDS+/−++/−+/−
Pneumothorax+++
Heart failure++++/−+/−
Pulmonary embolism+++/−+/−+/−
COPD/asthma+/−++

ARDS, acute respiratory distress syndrome; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

≤ 2 B-lines per intercostal space may be normal and visualised in lung fissures or dependent zones.

Lung ultrasound findings and associated conditions ARDS, acute respiratory distress syndrome; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. ≤ 2 B-lines per intercostal space may be normal and visualised in lung fissures or dependent zones.

Lung Ultrasound for COVID-19

The Supplementary Material provides background, indications, findings, and infection precautions for LUS during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Conclusion

LUS enhances the physical and echocardiographic examination to improve the diagnosis of the causes of respiratory failure. LUS has a clear advantage over chest X-ray as a point-of-care test that is portable, safe, and accurate and provides immediate feedback. Cardiologists may learn LUS to improve their diagnosis and management of cardiopulmonary disease.

Funding Sources

The authors have no funding sources to declare.

Disclosures

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
  3 in total

Review 1.  International evidence-based recommendations for point-of-care lung ultrasound.

Authors:  Giovanni Volpicelli; Mahmoud Elbarbary; Michael Blaivas; Daniel A Lichtenstein; Gebhard Mathis; Andrew W Kirkpatrick; Lawrence Melniker; Luna Gargani; Vicki E Noble; Gabriele Via; Anthony Dean; James W Tsung; Gino Soldati; Roberto Copetti; Belaid Bouhemad; Angelika Reissig; Eustachio Agricola; Jean-Jacques Rouby; Charlotte Arbelot; Andrew Liteplo; Ashot Sargsyan; Fernando Silva; Richard Hoppmann; Raoul Breitkreutz; Armin Seibel; Luca Neri; Enrico Storti; Tomislav Petrovic
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2012-03-06       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 2.  Lung Ultrasound for the Cardiologist.

Authors:  Eugenio Picano; Maria Chiara Scali; Quirino Ciampi; Daniel Lichtenstein
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2018-11

Review 3.  ASE Statement on Point-of-Care Ultrasound during the 2019 Novel Coronavirus Pandemic.

Authors:  Amer M Johri; Benjamin Galen; James N Kirkpatrick; Michael Lanspa; Sharon Mulvagh; Ritu Thamman
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 5.251

  3 in total
  3 in total

Review 1.  It's Not All about Echocardiography. Open the Lung Window for the Cardiac Emergencies.

Authors:  Eftihia Polyzogopoulou; Antonios Boultadakis; Ignatios Ikonomidis; John Parissis
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2021-01-14       Impact factor: 2.430

2.  The Utility of Handheld Cardiac and Lung Ultrasound in Predicting Outcomes of Hospitalised Patients With COVID-19.

Authors:  Ziv Dadon; Nir Levi; Amir Orlev; Daniel Belman; Evan Avraham Alpert; Michael Glikson; Shmuel Gottlieb; Adi Butnaru
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2021-12-03       Impact factor: 5.223

Review 3.  COVID-19 pathways for brain and heart injury in comorbidity patients: A role of medical imaging and artificial intelligence-based COVID severity classification: A review.

Authors:  Jasjit S Suri; Anudeep Puvvula; Mainak Biswas; Misha Majhail; Luca Saba; Gavino Faa; Inder M Singh; Ronald Oberleitner; Monika Turk; Paramjit S Chadha; Amer M Johri; J Miguel Sanches; Narendra N Khanna; Klaudija Viskovic; Sophie Mavrogeni; John R Laird; Gyan Pareek; Martin Miner; David W Sobel; Antonella Balestrieri; Petros P Sfikakis; George Tsoulfas; Athanasios Protogerou; Durga Prasanna Misra; Vikas Agarwal; George D Kitas; Puneet Ahluwalia; Raghu Kolluri; Jagjit Teji; Mustafa Al Maini; Ann Agbakoba; Surinder K Dhanjil; Meyypan Sockalingam; Ajit Saxena; Andrew Nicolaides; Aditya Sharma; Vijay Rathore; Janet N A Ajuluchukwu; Mostafa Fatemi; Azra Alizad; Vijay Viswanathan; Pudukode R Krishnan; Subbaram Naidu
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  2020-08-14       Impact factor: 4.589

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.