Literature DB >> 32416237

Predicting Trends in Cervical Spinal Surgery in the United States from 2020 to 2040.

Sean N Neifert1, Michael L Martini1, Frank Yuk1, Ian T McNeill1, John M Caridi1, Jeremy Steinberger1, Eric Karl Oermann2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We sought to predict surgical volumes for 2 common cervical spine procedures from 2020 to 2040.
METHODS: Using the National Inpatient Sample from 2003-2016, nationwide estimates of anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion (ACDF) and posterior cervical decompression and fusion (PCDF) volumes were calculated using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth and Tenth Revision (ICD-9, ICD-10) procedure codes. With data from the U.S. Census Bureau, estimates of the U.S. population were used to create Poisson models controlling for age and sex. Age was categorized into ranges (<25 years old, 25-34, 35-44, 45-54, 55-64, 65-74, 75-84, and >85), and estimates of surgical volume for each age group were created.
RESULTS: From 2020-2040, increases in surgical volume from 13.3% (153,288-173,699) and 19.3% (29,620-35,335) are expected for ACDF and PCDF, respectively. For ACDF, the largest increases are expected in the 45-54 (42,077-49,827) and 75-84 (8065-14,862) age groups, whereas for PCDF, the largest increases will be seen in the 75-84 (3710-6836) age group. In accordance with an aging population, modest increases will be seen for ACDF (858-1847) and PCDF (730-1573) in the >85-year-old cohort.
CONCLUSIONS: As expected, large growth in cervical spine surgical volumes is likely to be seen, which could indicate a need for increased numbers of spinal neurosurgeons and orthopedic surgeons. Further studies are needed to investigate the needs of the field in light of these expected increases in volume.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aging population; Anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion; Posterior cervical decompression and fusion; Projections; Surgical volume; United States

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32416237     DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.05.055

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World Neurosurg        ISSN: 1878-8750            Impact factor:   2.104


  10 in total

1.  Outcomes of cervical arthroplasty versus anterior cervical arthrodesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials with a minimum follow-up of 7-year.

Authors:  Jorge H Núñez; Berta Escudero; Irene Omiste; Judith Martínez-Peñas; Maria Surroca; Francisco Alonzo-González; David Bosch-García
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2022-08-20

2.  Increase in surgeons performing outpatient anterior cervical spine surgery leads to a shift in case volumes over time.

Authors:  Abhinaba Chatterjee; Nada Rbil; Michael Yancey; Matthew T Geiselmann; Benjamin Pesante; Sariah Khormaee
Journal:  N Am Spine Soc J       Date:  2022-06-12

Review 3.  Cost-effectiveness of anterior surgical decompression surgery for cervical degenerative disk disease: a systematic review of economic evaluations.

Authors:  V N E Schuermans; A Y J M Smeets; A F M Boselie; O Zarrouk; S M M Hermans; R Droeghaag; I Curfs; S M A A Evers; H van Santbrink
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 2.721

4.  Surgical Apgar Score and Controlling Nutritional Status Score are significant predictors of major complications after cervical spine surgery.

Authors:  Kousei Miura; Masao Koda; Toru Funayama; Hiroshi Takahashi; Hiroshi Noguchi; Kentaro Mataki; Yosuke Shibao; Kosuke Sato; Fumihiko Eto; Mamoru Kono; Tomoyuki Asada; Masashi Yamazaki
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 4.996

5.  Emergency department visits within 90 days of single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.

Authors:  Alexander J Kammien; Anoop R Galivanche; Michael J Gouzoulis; Harold G Moore; Michael R Mercier; Jonathan N Grauer
Journal:  N Am Spine Soc J       Date:  2022-05-11

6.  Four-level anterior versus posterior cervical fusions: Perioperative outcomes and five-year reoperation rates: Outcomes after four-level anterior versus posterior cervical procedures.

Authors:  Peter Y Joo; Rahul H Jayaram; William M McLaughlin; Bijan Ameri; Alexander J Kammien; Paul M Arnold; Jonathan N Grauer
Journal:  N Am Spine Soc J       Date:  2022-03-24

7.  The Effect of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Elective Cervical Spine Surgery Utilization and Complications in the United States: A Nationwide Temporal Trends Analysis.

Authors:  Adem Idrizi; Adam M Gordon; Aaron Lam; Charles Conway; Ahmed Saleh
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2022-07-30       Impact factor: 2.210

8.  Research protocol: Cervical Arthroplasty Cost Effectiveness Study (CACES): economic evaluation of anterior cervical discectomy with arthroplasty (ACDA) versus anterior cervical discectomy with fusion (ACDF) in the surgical treatment of cervical degenerative disc disease - a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Valérie N E Schuermans; Anouk Y J M Smeets; Toon F M Boselie; Math J J M Candel; Inez Curfs; Silvia M A A Evers; Henk Van Santbrink
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2022-08-26       Impact factor: 2.728

9.  CORR Insights®: Cervical Paraspinal Muscle Fatty Degeneration Is Not Associated with Muscle Cross-sectional Area: Qualitative Assessment Is Preferable for Cervical Sarcopenia.

Authors:  John M Popovich
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Effect of Arthroplasty vs Fusion for Patients With Cervical Radiculopathy: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Tonje Okkenhaug Johansen; Jarle Sundseth; Oddrun Anita Fredriksli; Hege Andresen; John-Anker Zwart; Frode Kolstad; Are Hugo Pripp; Sasha Gulati; Øystein Petter Nygaard
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-08-02
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.