Literature DB >> 32416038

Clinical Significance of Spontaneous Portosystemic Shunts in Living Donor Liver Transplantation.

Marc-Antoine Allard1,2, Nobuhisa Akamatsu1, Takashi Kokudo1, Kosuke Kobayashi1, Junichi Kaneko1, Takeaki Ishizawa1, Junichi Arita1, Kiyoshi Hasegawa1.   

Abstract

Spontaneous portosystemic shunts (SPSS) are commonly observed in patients undergoing living donor liver transplantation (LDLT); however, their impact on the outcome after transplantation is unclear. We aimed to assess the type, size, and the effects of SPSS on outcomes after LDLT. A total of 339 LDLT recipients in a single institution were included. The type and diameter of the SPSS (splenorenal shunt [SRS], oesogastric shunt, and umbilical shunt) were retrospectively analyzed. A large shunt was defined as having a diameter ≤7 mm. No portal flow modulation was attempted over time. Portal complications were defined as stenosis, thrombosis, or hepatofugal flow requiring any treatment after transplantation. There were 202 (59.0%) patients who exhibited at least 1 large SPSS. Neither the size nor type of SPSS was associated with mortality, morbidity, or liver function recovery. However, the incidence of portal complications was significantly higher in patients with a large SRS (8.6% versus 2.9%; P = 0.04). Multivariate analysis of portal complications revealed 2 independent predictors: pre-LT portal vein thrombosis (PVT) and SRS size. The observed risk among recipients with pre-LT PVT was 8.3% when the SRS was ≤7 mm, but increased to 38.5% when the SRS was >15 mm. The present study suggests that large SPSS do not negatively affect the outcomes after LDLT. However, a large SRS is associated with a higher risk of portal complications, particularly in recipients with pre-LT PVT, for whom intraoperative intervention for SRS should be considered. Otherwise, a conservative approach to SPSS during LDLT seems reasonable.
Copyright © 2020 by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32416038     DOI: 10.1002/lt.25798

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Liver Transpl        ISSN: 1527-6465            Impact factor:   5.799


  4 in total

Review 1.  Management of spontaneous portosystemic shunts at the time of liver transplantation: treatment or observation? Results of a systematic review.

Authors:  Caterina Cusumano; Stefano Gussago; Martina Guerra; Chloe Paul; François Faitot; Philippe Bachellier; Pietro Addeo
Journal:  Hepatol Int       Date:  2022-08-08       Impact factor: 9.029

2.  Do Natural Portosystemic Shunts Need to Be Compulsorily Ligated in Living Donor Liver Transplantation?

Authors:  Aarathi Vijayashanker; Bhargava R Chikkala; Roshan Ghimire; Ravindra Nidoni; M Rajgopal Acharya; Yuktansh Pandey; Rajesh Dey; Shahnawaz B Kaloo; Shaleen Agarwal; Subhash Gupta
Journal:  J Clin Exp Hepatol       Date:  2021-04-24

3.  Spontaneous portosystemic shunt diameter predicts liver function after balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration.

Authors:  Akihisa Tatsumi; Shinya Maekawa; Leona Osawa; Ryo Katoh; Yasuyuki Komiyama; Natsuko Nakakuki; Hitomi Takada; Shuya Matsuda; Masaru Muraoka; Yuichiro Suzuki; Mitsuaki Sato; Ei Takahashi; Mika Miura; Fumitake Amemiya; Shinichi Takano; Mitsuharu Fukasawa; Tatsuya Yamaguchi; Yasuhiro Nakayama; Taisuke Inoue; Hiroki Okada; Takuji Araki; Hiroshi Onishi; Nobuyuki Enomoto
Journal:  JGH Open       Date:  2022-01-28

Review 4.  Computed Tomography Images of Spontaneous Portosystemic Shunt in Liver Cirrhosis.

Authors:  Fangfang Yi; Xiaozhong Guo; Qing-Lei Zeng; Benqiang Yang; Yanglan He; Shanshan Yuan; Ankur Arora; Xingshun Qi
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2022-06-08
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.