Francesco D'Oria1, Marco A Bordinone2, Tiziana Rizzo2, Pasquale Puzo2, Rosa A Favale2, Silvana Guerriero2, Giovanni Alessio2. 1. Section of Ophthalmology, Department of Basic Medical Science, Neuroscience and Sense Organs, University of Bari, Piazza Giulio Cesare 11, 70124, Bari, Italy. francescodoria91@hotmail.it. 2. Section of Ophthalmology, Department of Basic Medical Science, Neuroscience and Sense Organs, University of Bari, Piazza Giulio Cesare 11, 70124, Bari, Italy.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To propose a modified ophthalmic triage system based on simple ophthalmic symptoms, signs and anamnestic data and validate its safety and effectiveness. METHODS: Phase 1 of the study was a retrospective review of chart records of patients admitted at the ophthalmic emergencies room (OER); phase 2 was a prospective study conducted on all consecutive patients presenting in the OER between April 1st, 2018, and May 30th, 2018. We selected the following six factors as predictors of urgency levels: altered vision, ocular behavior, color, distress, eye trauma, floaters and flashes. ATSO final score can be eventually converted into risk groups: low-risk group (scoring 0-3), intermediate-risk group (scoring 4-5) and high-risk group (scoring > 6). RESULTS: A total of 953 consecutive patients who presented to our OER over a two-month period were considered for participation in the study. The male-to-female ratio was 1.24:1. The mean age of the participants was 53 years (range 18-92, SD 19 years). ATSO score significantly correlated with urgency levels (p < .00001). The sensitivity of ATSO in differentiating urgent from non-urgent conditions was 91.4%, and the specificity was 98.2%. All hospitalized patients (30, 3.15%) have been coded as intermediate/high risk according to the ATSO score. CONCLUSION: The use of the ATSO score for patients at the OER provides the clinician with a reliable predictor of urgency, being at the same time safe and effective. The ATSO score may represent a valuable tool to implement triage of ocular patients in the emergency department.
PURPOSE: To propose a modified ophthalmic triage system based on simple ophthalmic symptoms, signs and anamnestic data and validate its safety and effectiveness. METHODS: Phase 1 of the study was a retrospective review of chart records of patients admitted at the ophthalmic emergencies room (OER); phase 2 was a prospective study conducted on all consecutive patients presenting in the OER between April 1st, 2018, and May 30th, 2018. We selected the following six factors as predictors of urgency levels: altered vision, ocular behavior, color, distress, eye trauma, floaters and flashes. ATSO final score can be eventually converted into risk groups: low-risk group (scoring 0-3), intermediate-risk group (scoring 4-5) and high-risk group (scoring > 6). RESULTS: A total of 953 consecutive patients who presented to our OER over a two-month period were considered for participation in the study. The male-to-female ratio was 1.24:1. The mean age of the participants was 53 years (range 18-92, SD 19 years). ATSO score significantly correlated with urgency levels (p < .00001). The sensitivity of ATSO in differentiating urgent from non-urgent conditions was 91.4%, and the specificity was 98.2%. All hospitalized patients (30, 3.15%) have been coded as intermediate/high risk according to the ATSO score. CONCLUSION: The use of the ATSO score for patients at the OER provides the clinician with a reliable predictor of urgency, being at the same time safe and effective. The ATSO score may represent a valuable tool to implement triage of ocular patients in the emergency department.