Literature DB >> 32415510

The COVID-19 pandemic brings a second wave of social isolation and disrupted services.

Alberto Stefana1, Eric A Youngstrom2, Christopher J Hopwood3, Antonios Dakanalis4.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32415510      PMCID: PMC7227800          DOI: 10.1007/s00406-020-01137-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci        ISSN: 0940-1334            Impact factor:   5.270


× No keyword cloud information.
Since December 2019, the outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has infected more than half a million people worldwide [1]. In a short time, governments across the globe decided to place entire cities and nations under quarantine because earlier, milder measures failed to control the COVID-19 spread. Quarantine separates people and restricts the movement of those who may have been exposed to a contagious disease to find out if they become sick and to prevent the disease from spreading. In this global situation, great attention has immediately focused on the effect of the pandemic on the general population, and in particular, infected patients and frontline responders. Less attention has been given to people with mental health problems [2]. However, our daily work as both public mental health professionals and researchers, sensitizes us to the psychological impact of quarantine on people with mental disorders. Here, we will focus on the Italian situation; however, many other countries now share similar conditions. At the time of this writing, Italy is among the countries most affected by the spread of the COVID-19, and has recorded the highest number of deaths (more than 9,000) worldwide [1]. Mass quarantine of the entire country started on March 3 and is scheduled to end on April 3 (although the Italian Government is considering an extension to July 31). It mandates isolation at home (or at community residential facilities) with permitted travel limited to shopping for food, going to work (only for essential services to remain operating), or seeking medical care. Quarantine has wide-ranging, substantial, and potentially long lasting negative psychological effects on the general population [3], especially when it lasts more than 10 days [4]. Such effects can be even more pervasive and serious in people with mental disorders. Indeed, psychiatric history is a risk factor for experiencing anxiety symptoms and anger 4–6 months after removal from quarantine [5]. Furthermore, history of psychiatric illness is a reliable predictor of posttraumatic stress disorder development in adults exposed to disaster/traumatic-related experiences [6, 7]. Being quarantined involves losing daily routines and personal and social contacts that make life meaningful and provide psychological support, and it comes with substantial costs for individuals with mental illnesses. The current epidemic situation also significantly disrupts the normal functioning of the Italian public Mental Health Departments: day treatment facilities are closed, home visits are suspended, and mental health outpatient facilities are limiting the visits to patients on depot medication or in psychiatric emergencies. The most symptomatic cases are managed through telephone consultation, and everyone else must wait. Most psychiatric patients cannot regularly attend outpatient visits for evaluation, monitoring, counseling, and prescriptions. Treatment progress and outcomes suffer when patients are unable to interact with their psychiatrist, psychologist, nurse, or other mental health professionals. The use of quarantine to maintain community health may not be comforting for psychiatric patients who are forced to renounce mental health care even as it heightens the need for it. There is an urgent need to avoid letting strategies being used to mitigate the effects of COVID-19 cause mental suffering in psychiatric patients. Now, more than ever, extra support is needed for this large and vulnerable population. The alternative is asking our patients and their relatives to pay a higher price in term of short- and long-term negative psychological effects, and footing the subsequent—likely massive—bill for the public health system. The implementation of enhanced psychiatric and psychological intervention services should include, but not be limited to: home visits with social distancing measures in place (when possible), telepsychiatry [8] and telepsychology [9], and the development of telephone and/or video chat support lines staffed by experienced mental health professionals and specifically addressed to quarantined people having difficulties accessing regular mental health services. In all cases of quarantined patients who are completely lacking communication devices, government should provide them access to communication devices [10] to ensure access to these services. A robust response will save money and avoid the societal risks associated with poor mental health. These efforts will show that we care as a society, and use technology to maintain social connection despite physical distance.
  7 in total

Review 1.  Mother Nature versus human nature: public compliance with evacuation and quarantine.

Authors:  Mary-Elise Manuell; Jeffrey Cukor
Journal:  Disasters       Date:  2010-11-15

2.  Risk and resilience in canine search and rescue handlers after 9/11.

Authors:  Jennifer Alvarez; Melissa Hunt
Journal:  J Trauma Stress       Date:  2005-10

3.  Prevalence and predictors of posttraumatic stress symptoms in utility workers deployed to the World Trade Center following the attacks of September 11, 2001.

Authors:  Judith Cukor; Katarzyna Wyka; Nimali Jayasinghe; Frank Weathers; Cezar Giosan; Pamela Leck; Jennifer Roberts; Lisa Spielman; Michael Crane; JoAnn Difede
Journal:  Depress Anxiety       Date:  2010-12-13       Impact factor: 6.505

4.  Mental health status of people isolated due to Middle East Respiratory Syndrome.

Authors:  Hyunsuk Jeong; Hyeon Woo Yim; Yeong-Jun Song; Moran Ki; Jung-Ah Min; Juhee Cho; Jeong-Ho Chae
Journal:  Epidemiol Health       Date:  2016-11-05

5.  SARS control and psychological effects of quarantine, Toronto, Canada.

Authors:  Laura Hawryluck; Wayne L Gold; Susan Robinson; Stephen Pogorski; Sandro Galea; Rima Styra
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 6.883

6.  Patients with mental health disorders in the COVID-19 epidemic.

Authors:  Hao Yao; Jian-Hua Chen; Yi-Feng Xu
Journal:  Lancet Psychiatry       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 27.083

Review 7.  The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: rapid review of the evidence.

Authors:  Samantha K Brooks; Rebecca K Webster; Louise E Smith; Lisa Woodland; Simon Wessely; Neil Greenberg; Gideon James Rubin
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2020-02-26       Impact factor: 79.321

  7 in total
  19 in total

Review 1.  Rheumatology and psychiatry: allies in times of COVID-19.

Authors:  Claudia Elera-Fitzcarrald; Jeff Huarcaya-Victoria; Graciela S Alarcón; Manuel F Ugarte-Gil
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 3.650

2.  COVID-19 Related Distress Is Associated With Alcohol Problems, Social Media and Food Addiction Symptoms: Insights From the Italian Experience During the Lockdown.

Authors:  Angelo Panno; Giuseppe Alessio Carbone; Chiara Massullo; Benedetto Farina; Claudio Imperatori
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2020-11-25       Impact factor: 4.157

3.  ESCAP CovCAP survey of heads of academic departments to assess the perceived initial (April/May 2020) impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on child and adolescent psychiatry services.

Authors:  Alexis Revet; Johannes Hebebrand; Dimitris Anagnostopoulos; Laura A Kehoe; Paul Klauser
Journal:  Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2021-01-20       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Processes for Trauma Care at Six Level I Trauma Centers During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Laura Harwood; Stephanie Jarvis; Kristin Salottolo; Diane Redmond; Gina M Berg; Wendy Erickson; Dana Spruell; Shenequa Deas; Paul Sharpe; Amy Atnip; David Cornutt; Charles Mains; David Bar-Or
Journal:  J Healthc Qual       Date:  2021 Jan-Feb 01       Impact factor: 1.028

5.  The Collateral Impact of COVID-19 Emergency on Neonatal Intensive Care Units and Family-Centered Care: Challenges and Opportunities.

Authors:  Loredana Cena; Paolo Biban; Jessica Janos; Manuela Lavelli; Joshua Langfus; Angelina Tsai; Eric A Youngstrom; Alberto Stefana
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-02-24

Review 6.  Review: How Can Intelligent Robots and Smart Mechatronic Modules Facilitate Remote Assessment, Assistance, and Rehabilitation for Isolated Adults With Neuro-Musculoskeletal Conditions?

Authors:  S Farokh Atashzar; Jay Carriere; Mahdi Tavakoli
Journal:  Front Robot AI       Date:  2021-04-12

7.  Mental Health States Experienced by Perinatal Healthcare Workers during COVID-19 Pandemic in Italy.

Authors:  Loredana Cena; Matteo Rota; Stefano Calza; Barbara Massardi; Alice Trainini; Alberto Stefana
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Prevalence of maternal antenatal anxiety and its association with demographic and socioeconomic factors: A multicentre study in Italy.

Authors:  L Cena; F Mirabella; G Palumbo; A Gigantesco; A Trainini; A Stefana
Journal:  Eur Psychiatry       Date:  2020-09-07       Impact factor: 5.361

9.  Living with cancer in the COVID-19 pandemic: An Italian survey on self-isolation at home.

Authors:  Valentina Biagioli; Beatrice Albanesi; Silvia Belloni; Alessio Piredda; Rosario Caruso
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Care (Engl)       Date:  2020-12-07       Impact factor: 2.328

10.  Estimating the Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Maternal and Perinatal Health Care Services in Italy: Results of a Self-Administered Survey.

Authors:  Loredana Cena; Matteo Rota; Stefano Calza; Barbara Massardi; Alice Trainini; Alberto Stefana
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2021-07-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.