Jing Xi1,2, Cynthia X Ma3,4. 1. Section of Medical Oncology, Division of Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 South Euclid Ave, Campus Box 8076, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA. 2. Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 South Euclid Ave, Campus Box 8076, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA. 3. Section of Medical Oncology, Division of Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 South Euclid Ave, Campus Box 8076, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA. cynthiaxma@wustl.edu. 4. Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 South Euclid Ave, Campus Box 8076, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA. cynthiaxma@wustl.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors have revolutionized the treatment landscape for patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+) and HER2-negative (HER2-) metastatic breast cancer (MBC). However, optimal therapy after CDK4/6 inhibitors is unknown. This review provides an update on recent understanding of potential resistance mechanisms to CDK4/6 inhibitors and therapeutic strategies. RECENT FINDINGS: CDK4/6 inhibitors are broadly effective for HR+/HER2- MBC. However, intrinsic and acquired resistance is inevitable. Although there are no established clinical predictors of response aside from ER positivity, several cell cycle-specific and non-specific mechanisms have emerged as potential resistance biomarkers and therapeutic targets in recent studies. Examples include loss of function mutations in RB1 or FAT1, overexpression or amplification of CDK6 and CCNE1, alterations of FGFR, and PI3K/mTOR-mediated CDK2 activation. Biomarker studies and clinical trials targeting CDK4/6 inhibitor resistance are critical to improve treatments for HR+/HER2- MBC.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors have revolutionized the treatment landscape for patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+) and HER2-negative (HER2-) metastatic breast cancer (MBC). However, optimal therapy after CDK4/6 inhibitors is unknown. This review provides an update on recent understanding of potential resistance mechanisms to CDK4/6 inhibitors and therapeutic strategies. RECENT FINDINGS:CDK4/6 inhibitors are broadly effective for HR+/HER2- MBC. However, intrinsic and acquired resistance is inevitable. Although there are no established clinical predictors of response aside from ER positivity, several cell cycle-specific and non-specific mechanisms have emerged as potential resistance biomarkers and therapeutic targets in recent studies. Examples include loss of function mutations in RB1 or FAT1, overexpression or amplification of CDK6 and CCNE1, alterations of FGFR, and PI3K/mTOR-mediated CDK2 activation. Biomarker studies and clinical trials targeting CDK4/6 inhibitor resistance are critical to improve treatments for HR+/HER2- MBC.
Entities:
Keywords:
Abemaciclib; Alpelisib; Aromatase inhibitor; Aurora kinase inhibitor; Biomarkers; CDK inhibitor; CDK4/6 inhibitor; Clinical trials; ESR1; Endocrine therapy; Estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancer; Everolimus; FGFR inhibitor; Fulvestrant; Hormone receptor-positive (HR+) and HER2-negative (HER2−) breast cancer; Metastatic breast cancer (MBC); PI3K inhibitor; PIK3CA; Palbociclib; RB1; Resistance mechanisms; Ribociclib; Selective estrogen receptor downregulator (SERD); Sequencing of therapy; Targeted therapy; mTOR inhibitor
Authors: Hui-Qiang Zhang; Jin-Mei Zhou; Shao-Hua Zhang; Li Bian; Jin-Yi Xiao; Xiao-Peng Hao; Ze-Fei Jiang; Tao Wang Journal: Ann Transl Med Date: 2021-10