Literature DB >> 32415319

Undernutrition shifted colonic fermentation and digest-associated bacterial communities in pregnant ewes.

Yanfeng Xue1,2, Fan Hu1,2, Changzheng Guo1,2, Shijun Mei1,2, Fei Xie1,2, Hongbo Zeng1,2, Shengyong Mao3,4,5.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of undernutrition on colonic microbiota and fermentation in pregnant ewes. Sixteen ewes bearing multiple fetuses for 115 days in the control (CON) and severe feed restriction (SFR) groups were fed 100% and 30% level of ad libitum feed intake, respectively. After 15-day treatment, all ewes were sacrificed to collect colonic digesta samples to extract DNA for 16S rRNA sequencing and to detect fermentation parameters. Our data showed that SFR increased (P < 0.05) the levels of colonic propionate, isobutyrate, butyrate, isovalerate, and valerate, and slightly decreased (P < 0.1) colonic pH. The mole proportions of isobutyrate, butyrate, and isovalerate were increased (P < 0.05) upon SFR while that of acetate was decreased (P < 0.05). Hematoxylin-eosin staining sections exhibited the disorderly, irregular, and loose arrangement and part sloughing of colonic epithelial cells. Furthermore, SFR decreased (P < 0.05) the diversity of colonic microbiota and changed the microbial communities. At the genus level, SFR increased (P < 0.05) the abundance of unclassified Peptococcaceae and decreased (P < 0.05) the abundances of Ruminococcus, unclassified Ruminococcaceae, and unclassified VadinBB60. Additionally, the abundances of Ruminococcus and unclassified Ruminococcaceae were positively correlated (P < 0.05) with the acetate proportion while the abundance of unclassified Peptococcaceae was negatively correlated (P < 0.05) with the percentages of isobutyrate, butyrate, and isovalerate. In summary, SFR diminished the diversity of bacteria, affected the composition of bacterial communities, and finally changed the colonic fermentation pattern and epithelial histomorphology in pregnant ewes. KEY POINTS: • Undernutrition changed colonic bacterial diversity and composition in pregnant ewes. • Microbial alteration affected colonic fermentation pattern and parameters. • Alteration of colonic microbiota and fermentation damaged epithelium histomorphology. Graphical abstract.

Entities:  

Keywords:  16S rRNA; Feed restriction; Gestation; Intestinal microbiota; Volatile fatty acid

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32415319     DOI: 10.1007/s00253-020-10662-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol        ISSN: 0175-7598            Impact factor:   4.813


  27 in total

1.  UPARSE: highly accurate OTU sequences from microbial amplicon reads.

Authors:  Robert C Edgar
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2013-08-18       Impact factor: 28.547

2.  The response of ruminal fermentation, epithelium-associated microbiota, and epithelial barrier function to severe feed restriction in pregnant ewes.

Authors:  Fan Hu; Yanfeng Xue; Changzheng Guo; Junhua Liu; Shengyong Mao
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-09-29       Impact factor: 3.159

Review 3.  The voluntary food intake of pregnant and lactating ruminants: a review.

Authors:  J M Forbes
Journal:  Br Vet J       Date:  1970-01

Review 4.  Alterations of gut barrier and gut microbiota in food restriction, food deprivation and protein-energy wasting.

Authors:  L Genton; P D Cani; J Schrenzel
Journal:  Clin Nutr       Date:  2014-10-12       Impact factor: 7.324

5.  PyNAST: a flexible tool for aligning sequences to a template alignment.

Authors:  J Gregory Caporaso; Kyle Bittinger; Frederic D Bushman; Todd Z DeSantis; Gary L Andersen; Rob Knight
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-11-13       Impact factor: 6.937

6.  Unique aspects of fiber degradation by the ruminal ethanologen Ruminococcus albus 7 revealed by physiological and transcriptomic analysis.

Authors:  Melissa R Christopherson; John A Dawson; David M Stevenson; Andrew C Cunningham; Shanti Bramhacharya; Paul J Weimer; Christina Kendziorski; Garret Suen
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2014-12-04       Impact factor: 3.969

7.  Characterization of the rumen and fecal microbiome in bloated and non-bloated cattle grazing alfalfa pastures and subjected to bloat prevention strategies.

Authors:  E Azad; H Derakhshani; R J Forster; R J Gruninger; S Acharya; T A McAllister; E Khafipour
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-03-12       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Dynamics of Human Gut Microbiota and Short-Chain Fatty Acids in Response to Dietary Interventions with Three Fermentable Fibers.

Authors:  Nielson T Baxter; Alexander W Schmidt; Arvind Venkataraman; Kwi S Kim; Clive Waldron; Thomas M Schmidt
Journal:  mBio       Date:  2019-01-29       Impact factor: 7.867

9.  Mechanistic Insights Into the Cross-Feeding of Ruminococcus gnavus and Ruminococcus bromii on Host and Dietary Carbohydrates.

Authors:  Emmanuelle H Crost; Gwenaelle Le Gall; Jenny A Laverde-Gomez; Indrani Mukhopadhya; Harry J Flint; Nathalie Juge
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2018-11-05       Impact factor: 5.640

10.  Gut microbiome modulation during treatment of mucositis with the dairy bacterium Lactococcus lactis and recombinant strain secreting human antimicrobial PAP.

Authors:  Rodrigo Carvalho; Aline Vaz; Felipe Luiz Pereira; Fernanda Dorella; Eric Aguiar; Jean-Marc Chatel; Luis Bermudez; Philippe Langella; Gabriel Fernandes; Henrique Figueiredo; Aristóteles Goes-Neto; Vasco Azevedo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-10-10       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  1 in total

1.  Using Extract From the Stems and Leaves of Yizhi (Alpiniae oxyphyllae) as Feed Additive Increases Meat Quality and Intestinal Health in Ducks.

Authors:  Fengjie Ji; Lihong Gu; Guang Rong; Chengjun Hu; Weiping Sun; Dingfa Wang; Weiqi Peng; Dajie Lin; Quanwei Liu; Hongzhi Wu; Haofu Dai; Hanlin Zhou; Tieshan Xu
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2022-01-31
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.