Literature DB >> 32414723

The impact of the Tracey judgment on the rates and outcomes of in-hospital cardiac arrests in UK hospitals participating in the National Cardiac Arrest Audit.

Zohra Zenasni1, Emily C Reynolds2, David A Harrison1, Kathryn M Rowan1, Jerry P Nolan3, Jasmeet Soar4, Gary B Smith5.   

Abstract

AIMS: The aim was to determine if the 17 June 2014 Tracey judgment regarding 'do not attempt cardiopulmonary resuscitation' decisions led to increases in the rate of in-hospital cardiac arrests resulting in a resuscitation attempt (IHCA) and/or proportion of resuscitation attempts deemed futile.
METHOD: Using UK National Cardiac Arrest Audit data, the IHCA rate and proportion of resuscitation attempts deemed futile were compared for two periods (pre-judgment (01 July 2012 - 16 June 2014, inclusive) and post-judgment (01 July 2014 - 30 June 2016, inclusive)) using interrupted time series analyses.
RESULTS: A total of 43,109 IHCAs (115 hospitals) were analysed. There were fewer IHCAs post- than pre-judgment (21,324 vs 21,785, respectively). The IHCA rate was declining over time before the judgment but there was an abrupt and statistically significant increase in the period immediately following the judgment (p<0.001). This was not sustained post-judgment. The proportion of resuscitation attempts deemed futile was smaller post-judgment than pre-judgment (8.2% vs 14.9%, respectively). The rate of attempts deemed futile decreased post-judgment (p<0.001).
CONCLUSION: The IHCA rate increased immediately after the Tracey judgment while the proportion of resuscitation attempts deemed futile decreased. The precise mechanisms for these changes are unclear. © Royal College of Physicians 2020. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DNACPR; Resuscitation; Tracey judgment; cardiac arrest; do not attempt cardiopulmonary resuscitation

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32414723      PMCID: PMC7354039          DOI: 10.7861/clinmed.2019-0454

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Med (Lond)        ISSN: 1470-2118            Impact factor:   2.659


  13 in total

1.  'Do not attempt resuscitation' decision-making: a study exploring the attitudes and experiences of nurses.

Authors:  Helen Giles; Pam Moule
Journal:  Nurs Crit Care       Date:  2004 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.325

2.  A prospective trial of a new policy eliminating signed consent for do not resuscitate orders.

Authors:  Daniel P Sulmasy; Johanna R Sood; Kenneth Texiera; Ruth L McAuley; Jennifer McGugins; Wayne A Ury
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  If asked, hospitalized patients will choose whether to receive life-sustaining therapies.

Authors:  Nelson Nicolasora; Rahul Pannala; Stavros Mountantonakis; Bala Shanmugam; Angela DeGirolamo; Yaw Amoateng-Adjepong; Constantine A Manthous
Journal:  J Hosp Med       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 2.960

4.  Patients' attitudes towards "do not attempt resuscitation" status.

Authors:  A J Gorton; N V G Jayanthi; P Lepping; M W Scriven
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 2.903

5.  Barriers to involving older people in their resuscitation decisions: the primary-secondary care mismatch highlights the potential role of general practitioners.

Authors:  C L Holland; L K Bowker; P K Myint
Journal:  Int J Clin Pract       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Incidence and outcome of in-hospital cardiac arrest in the United Kingdom National Cardiac Arrest Audit.

Authors:  Jerry P Nolan; Jasmeet Soar; Gary B Smith; Carl Gwinnutt; Francesca Parrott; Sarah Power; David A Harrison; Edel Nixon; Kathryn Rowan
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2014-04-15       Impact factor: 5.262

7.  Discussing preferences for cardiopulmonary resuscitation: what do resident physicians and their hospitalized patients think was decided?

Authors:  Kristy S Deep; Charles H Griffith; John F Wilson
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2008-03-11

Review 8.  Do not attempt cardiopulmonary resuscitation (DNACPR) orders: a systematic review of the barriers and facilitators of decision-making and implementation.

Authors:  Carole Mockford; Zoë Fritz; Rob George; Rachel Court; Amy Grove; Ben Clarke; Richard Field; Gavin D Perkins
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2014-11-26       Impact factor: 5.262

9.  Interrupted time series regression for the evaluation of public health interventions: a tutorial.

Authors:  James Lopez Bernal; Steven Cummins; Antonio Gasparrini
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 7.196

10.  Development and validation of risk models to predict outcomes following in-hospital cardiac arrest attended by a hospital-based resuscitation team.

Authors:  David A Harrison; Krishna Patel; Edel Nixon; Jasmeet Soar; Gary B Smith; Carl Gwinnutt; Jerry P Nolan; Kathryn M Rowan
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2014-05-14       Impact factor: 5.262

View more
  1 in total

1.  COVID-19: the physician's response in the first phase.

Authors:  Anton Emmanuel
Journal:  Clin Med (Lond)       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 2.659

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.