| Literature DB >> 32414356 |
M Gupta1, A B Zwi2, J Jagnoor3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Four million people living in the Indian Sundarbans region in the state of West Bengal face a particularly high risk of drowning due to rurality, presence of open water, lack of accessible health systems and poor infrastructure. Although the World Health Organization has identified several interventions that may prevent drowning in rural low-and middle-income country contexts, none are currently implemented in this region. This study aims to conduct contextual policy analysis for the development of a drowning program. Implementation of a drowning program should consider leveraging existing structures and resources, as interventions that build on policy targets or government programs are more likely to be sustainable and scalable.Entities:
Keywords: Asphyxia; Drowning; Government programs; Implementation science; India; Policy making; Safety; Wounds and injuries
Year: 2020 PMID: 32414356 PMCID: PMC7229618 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-020-08868-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Public Health ISSN: 1471-2458 Impact factor: 3.295
Inclusion Criteria for data sources
| Data source | Inclusion Criteria |
|---|---|
| Government policy documents | • Currently implementable as of July 2019 • Implementable in West Bengal • Discussion of principles, goals or programs that relate to drowning and/or WHO-recommended drowning reduction interventions |
| Grey literature | • Published from 1999 to 2019 • Discussion or evaluation of policy or programs in West Bengal that relate to drowning and/or WHO-recommended drowning reduction programs • If evaluation of a government program, GRADE score of Very Low was excluded |
| Peer-reviewed articles | • Published from 1999 to 2019 • Discussion or evaluation of policy or programs in West Bengal that relate to drowning and/or WHO-recommended drowning reduction programs • If evaluation of a government program, GRADE score of Very Low was excluded |
Fig. 1Policy linkages to drowning interventions
Programs that may contribute to drowning interventions
| Relevant government program identified in policy | Potential contribution to recommended drowning interventions | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Integrated Child Development Scheme (ICDS) | No | Yes | No | No |
| Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MNREGA) 2005 | No | Yes | No | No |
| Rajiv Gandhi National Crèche Scheme for the Children of Working Mothers 1994 | No | Yes | No | No |
| National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development (NABARD) Self-Help Group Bank Linkage Program | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Accredited Social Health Activist (ASHA) program | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Village Health, Sanitation and Nutrition Committees (VHSNC) | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Fig. 2PROGRESS-Plus analysis
Equiframe analysis
| Domain | Number of policies |
|---|---|
| Does the policy support the rights of underserved groups with equal opportunity in receiving services? | 9 |
| Does the policy support the rights of underserved groups with individually tailored services to meet their needs and choices? | 14 |
| Does the policy indicate how underserved groups may qualify for specific benefits relevant to them? | 5 |
| Does the policy recognize the capabilities existing within underserved groups? | 13 |
| Does the policy support the right of underserved groups to participate in the decisions that affect their lives and enhance their empowerment? | 10 |
| Are underserved groups protected from harm during their interaction with health and related systems? | 5 |
| Does the policy support the right of underserved groups to be free from unwarranted physical or other confinement? | 5 |
| Does the policy support the right of underserved groups to consent, refuse to consent, withdraw consent, or otherwise control or exercise choice or control over what happens to him or her? | 6 |
| Does the policy address the need for information regarding underserved groups to be kept private and confidential? | 1 |
| Does the policy recognize that underserved groups can be productive contributors to society? | 11 |
| Does the policy recognize the value of the family members of underserved groups in addressing health and safety needs? | 6 |
| Does the policy recognize that individual members of underserved groups may have an impact on the family members, requiring additional support from health or other related services? | 2 |
| Does the policy ensure that services respond to the beliefs, values, gender, interpersonal styles, attitudes, cultural, ethnic, or linguistic aspects of the person? | 5 |
| Does the policy specify to whom, and for what, services providers are accountable? | 9 |
| Does the policy support underserved groups’ physical, economic, and information access to services? | 10 |