| Literature DB >> 32414099 |
Melissa Davis1, Rachel Martini1, Lisa Newman1, Olivier Elemento2,3,4, Jason White5, Akanksha Verma6, Indrani Datta7, Indra Adrianto7, Yalei Chen7, Kevin Gardner8, Hyung-Gyoon Kim9, Windy D Colomb5,10, Isam-Eldin Eltoum9,11, Andra R Frost9,11, William E Grizzle9,11,12, Andrea Sboner3,4,13, Upender Manne9,11, Clayton Yates5.
Abstract
Triple negative breast cancers (TNBCs) are molecularly heterogeneous, and the link between their aggressiveness with African ancestry is not established. We investigated primary TNBCs for gene expression among self-reported race (SRR) groups of African American (AA, n = 42) and European American (EA, n = 33) women. RNA sequencing data were analyzed to measure changes in genome-wide expression, and we utilized logistic regressions to identify ancestry-associated gene expression signatures. Using SNVs identified from our RNA sequencing data, global ancestry was estimated. We identified 156 African ancestry-associated genes and found that, compared to SRR, quantitative genetic analysis was a more robust method to identify racial/ethnic-specific genes that were differentially expressed. A subset of African ancestry-specific genes that were upregulated in TNBCs of our AA patients were validated in TCGA data. In AA patients, there was a higher incidence of basal-like two tumors and altered TP53, NFB1, and AKT pathways. The distinct distribution of TNBC subtypes and altered oncologic pathways show that the ethnic variations in TNBCs are driven by shared genetic ancestry. Thus, to appreciate the molecular diversity of TNBCs, tumors from patients of various ancestral origins should be evaluated.Entities:
Keywords: African ancestry; RNAseq analysis; disparities; oncologic pathways; triple negative breast cancer
Year: 2020 PMID: 32414099 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12051220
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cancers (Basel) ISSN: 2072-6694 Impact factor: 6.639