| Literature DB >> 32414022 |
Karel Dvořák1, Adéla Macháčková2, Simona Ravaszová1, Dominik Gazdič1.
Abstract
This contribution characterizes the performance of a DESI 11 high-speed disintegrator working on the principle of a pin mill with two opposite counter-rotating rotors. As the ground material, batches of Portland cement featuring 6-7 Mohs scale hardness and containing relatively hard and abrasive compounds with the specific surface areas ranging from 200 to 500 m2/kg, with the step of 50 m2/kg, were used. The character of the ground particles was assessed via scanning electron microscopy and measurement of the absolute/relative increase in their specific surface areas. Detailed characterization of the rotors was performed via recording the thermal imprints, evaluating their wear by 3D optical microscopy, and measuring rotor weight loss after the grinding of constant amounts of cement. The results showed that coarse particles are ground by impacting the front faces of the pins, while finer particles are primarily milled via mutual collisions. Therefore, the coarse particles cause higher abrasion and wear on the rotor pins; after the milling of 20 kg of the 200 m2/kg cement sample, the wear of the rotor reached up to 5% of its original mass and the pins were severely damaged.Entities:
Keywords: cement; disintegrator; high energy milling; microscopy; wear
Year: 2020 PMID: 32414022 PMCID: PMC7287960 DOI: 10.3390/ma13102234
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Figure 1(a) Schematic depiction of the investigated disintegrator; (b) laboratory DESI 11 HSG mill (c) rotor with three rows of pins; (d) rotor with two rows of pins.
Partial chemical compositions of the ground material.
| Material | Component | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SiO2 | CaO | Al2O3 | Fe2O3 | SO3 | CaSO4∙2H2O | H2O | CaSO4 | Others | |
| Clinker | 20.29 | 65.33 | 5.21 | 5.04 | 0.79 | - | - | - | 3.34 |
| Gypsum | - | - | - | - | - | 84.0 | 11.0 | 2.4 | 2.6 |
Figure 2Comparison of the original and post-milling shapes of cement particles for: 200 m2/kg sample, (a) original particles; (d) milled particles; 300 m2/kg sample, (b) original particles; (e) milled particles; 450 m2/kg sample, (c) original particles; (f) milled particles.
Figure 3Increase in specific surface area for all ground samples.
Figure 4Thermal imprints on rotors before and after milling of 1 kg of individual batches: (a) new rotor with two rows of pins (rotation direction is marked by white arrow); (b) new rotor; (c) 200 m2/kg; (d) 250 m2/kg; (e) 300 m2/kg; (f) 350 m2/kg; (g) 400 m2/kg; (h) 450 m2/kg; (i) 500 m2/kg.
Figure 5Effect of the amount of ground material on rotor wear for individual samples.
Specific surface area of the cement powder at the beginning and after 10 and 20 kg.
| Input Specific Surface Area (m2/kg) | Specific Surface Area of Resulting Powders (m2/kg) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 kg | 10 kg | 20 kg | |
| 200 | 310 | 305 | 273 |
| 450 | 548 | 543 | 541 |
Reduction of grinding efficiency.
| Input Specific Surface Area (m2/kg) | Grinding Efficiency Reduction (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 kg | 10 kg | 20 kg | |
| 200 | - | 1.61 | 11.94 |
| 450 | - | 0.91 | 1.28 |
Figure 6Optical images of new rotor: (a) 3D scan and (b) height profile of pins; optical images of rotor used for milling of 20 kg batch of 450 m2/kg sample: (c) 3D scan and (d) height profile of pins; optical images of rotor used for milling of 20 kg batch of 200 m2/kg sample: (e) 3D scan and (f) height profile of pins. Detailed images of pin marked by circle in (f) from rotor used for milling of 20 kg batch of 200 m2/kg sample: (g) detailed scan and (h) coloured profile. (Rotation directions marked by arrows).