Literature DB >> 32413557

The more exposure to media information about COVID-19, the more distressed you will feel.

Hao Yao1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anxiety; COVID-19; Depression; Media exposure; Psychological distress

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32413557      PMCID: PMC7215146          DOI: 10.1016/j.bbi.2020.05.031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Behav Immun        ISSN: 0889-1591            Impact factor:   7.217


× No keyword cloud information.
Dear Editor, As the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic escalates, media outlets are being flooded with all kinds of information about COVID-19, including an increasing number of rumors and untruths. And the public are also eager to receive the latest information about COVID-19 from the media. However, it is suggested that repeated media exposure to public health crises, including infectious diseases, can cause heightened psychological distress (Garfin et al., 2020, Holman et al., 2014). We still don’t know whether high levels of COVID-19 media exposure can result in amplified anxiety and depression in the general population as well (Holmes et al., 2020). So, in the current study, we examined the association between media exposure to information about COVID-19 and psychological distress in the general population in China. Chinese citizens aged ≥18 years were invited to participate with an online questionnaire about the COVID-19 epidemic during Jan 31 and Feb 7, 2020, when the number of COVID-19 infections in China reached its peak and a nationwide stay-at-home order had been issued. Media exposure to information about COVID-19 was assessed by asking respondents how many hours per day (≤1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, ≥7) they spent receiving information about COVID-19 from different media sources (e.g., television, radio, newspaper, online websites, and social media) in the past one week (Holman et al., 2014). Psychological distress was measured by the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) and the General Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD-7). Besides, we collected respondents’ information on demographics, history of mental illness, and social support (based on the Oslo Social Support Scale [OSSS-3]) (Kocalevent et al., 2018), as well as other COVID-19 exposure covariates by asking respondents whether they were diagnosed with COVID-19; whether they had a history of contact with COVID-19 cases; whether someone close to them was diagnosed with COVID-19; and whether they or someone close to them was working on the front lines of COVID-19 (Table 1 ). Multivariate linear regression was used to explain the association between media exposure to information about COVID-19 and psychological distress in the general population after adjustment for covariates.
Table 1

Baseline characteristics of respondents (n = 300).

CharacteristicMean (SD) or n (%)
Age, years26.5 (SD 6.7)
Gender
 Male59 (19.7%)
 Female241 (80.3%)
Education
 Associate degree or lower35 (11.7%)
 Bachelor’s degree180 (60%)
 Master’s degree or higher85 (28.3%)
Marriage
 Single257 (85.7%)
 Married39 (13.0%)
 Divorced4 (1.3%)
Monthly income, yuan
 <200097 (32.3%)
 2000–400044 (14.7%)
 4000–600050 (16.7%)
 6000–800031 (10.3%)
 8000–10,00019 (6.3%)
 >10,00059 (19.7%)
Employment
 Full-time student127 (42.3%)
 Full-time employed137 (45.7%)
 Part-time employed17 (5.7%)
 Unemployed18 (6%)
 Retired1 (0.3%)
Living area
 Hubei*14 (4.7%)
 Others286 (95.3%)
Diagnosis of COVID-19
 Yes0
 No300 (100%)
History of contact with COVID-19 cases
 Yes35 (11.7%)
 No264 (88.3%)
Someone close to them diagnosed with COVID-19
 Yes0
 No300 (100%)
Working on the front lines of COVID-19
 Yes29 (9.67%)
 No271 (90.33%)
Someone close to them working on the front lines of COVID-19
 Yes42 (14%)
 No258 (86%)
History of mental illness
 Yes72 (24%)
 No228 (76%)
 OSSS-39.5 (SD 2.2)
Media exposure to COVID-19, hours per day
 ≤126 (8.7%)
 252 (17.3%)
 355 (18.3%)
 442 (14%)
 531 (10.3%)
 625 (8.3%)
 ≥769 (23%)
 PHQ-98.3 (SD 6.4)
 GAD-77.7 (SD 6.2)

* Hubei Province is the epicenter of the COVID-19 epidemic in China.

Abbreviations: COVID-19 = coronavirus disease 2019; OSSS = Oslo Social Support Scale; PHQ-9 = Patient Health Questionnaire 9 Items; GAD = General Anxiety Disorder Scale 7 Items

Baseline characteristics of respondents (n = 300). * Hubei Province is the epicenter of the COVID-19 epidemic in China. Abbreviations: COVID-19 = coronavirus disease 2019; OSSS = Oslo Social Support Scale; PHQ-9 = Patient Health Questionnaire 9 Items; GAD = General Anxiety Disorder Scale 7 Items In total, 300 Chinese adults completed the questionnaire; their basic characteristics are show in Table 1. Median level of COVID-19 media exposure was 4 (IQR 2–6) hours per day. Mean scores on the PHQ-9 and the GAD-7 were 8.3 (SD 6.4) and 7.7 (SD 6.2) respectively. Multivariate linear regression found that a higher level of COVID-19 media exposure was significantly associated with higher PHQ-9 scores (B = 0.565 [95% CI 0.330–0.799], t = 4.743, P < 0.001) and higher GAD-7 scores (B = 0.741 [95% CI 0.503–0.979], t = 6.138, P < 0.001), even after adjustment for demographics, history of mental illness, social support, and other COVID-19 exposure covariates. The dose-response relationships between COVID-19 media exposure and PHQ-9 and GAD-7 scores are shown in Fig. 1 .
Fig. 1

Dose-response relationship between media exposure to information about COVID-19 in the past one week and psychological distress in the healthy population. COVID-19 = coronavirus disease 2019; PHQ-9 = Patient Health Questionnaire 9 Items; GAD = General Anxiety Disorder Scale 7 Items. Top. PHQ-9 scores by the number of hours per day (≤1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, ≥7) of COVID-19 media exposure. Bottom. GAD-7 scores by the number of hours per day (≤1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, ≥7) of COVID-19 media exposure. Data are presented as means ± s.d.

Dose-response relationship between media exposure to information about COVID-19 in the past one week and psychological distress in the healthy population. COVID-19 = coronavirus disease 2019; PHQ-9 = Patient Health Questionnaire 9 Items; GAD = General Anxiety Disorder Scale 7 Items. Top. PHQ-9 scores by the number of hours per day (≤1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, ≥7) of COVID-19 media exposure. Bottom. GAD-7 scores by the number of hours per day (≤1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, ≥7) of COVID-19 media exposure. Data are presented as means ± s.d. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study that demonstrates a dose-response relationship between media exposure to information about COVID-19 and psychological distress in the healthy population. The negative effects of repeated media exposure on mental health can be seen in other community crises, including the 9/11 terrorist attack, the Boston Marathon Bombings, and the 2014 Ebola epidemic (Garfin et al., 2020, Holman et al., 2014). Media-fueled psychological distress can engender misplaced help-seeking behaviors that will consume large amounts of health care resources. Our study suggests that it may be true of the COVID-19 epidemic as well and necessitates future actions to buffer the negative effects of repeated media exposure to information about COVID-19.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
  3 in total

1.  Media's role in broadcasting acute stress following the Boston Marathon bombings.

Authors:  E Alison Holman; Dana Rose Garfin; Roxane Cohen Silver
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-12-09       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  The novel coronavirus (COVID-2019) outbreak: Amplification of public health consequences by media exposure.

Authors:  Dana Rose Garfin; Roxane Cohen Silver; E Alison Holman
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2020-03-23       Impact factor: 4.267

3.  Social support in the general population: standardization of the Oslo social support scale (OSSS-3).

Authors:  Rüya-Daniela Kocalevent; Lorenz Berg; Manfred E Beutel; Andreas Hinz; Markus Zenger; Martin Härter; Urs Nater; Elmar Brähler
Journal:  BMC Psychol       Date:  2018-07-17
  3 in total
  21 in total

1.  Overexposure to COVID-19 information amplifies emotional distress: a latent moderated mediation model.

Authors:  Yi Feng; Wen Gu; Fangbai Dong; Dan Dong; Zhihong Qiao
Journal:  Transl Psychiatry       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 7.989

2.  Media Exposure Related to the PTSS During COVID-19 Pandemic: The Mediating Role of Risk Perception.

Authors:  Yiqing Wang; Ling Jiang; Shuang Ma; Qinian Chen; Chengbin Liu; Farooq Ahmed; Muhammad Shahid; Xiaohua Wang; Jing Guo
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2021-04-22       Impact factor: 4.157

3.  Different impacts of COVID-19-related information sources on public worry: An online survey through social media.

Authors:  Hsing-Ying Ho; Yi-Lung Chen; Cheng-Fang Yen
Journal:  Internet Interv       Date:  2020-10-12

Review 4.  Climate change, environment pollution, COVID-19 pandemic and mental health.

Authors:  Donatella Marazziti; Paolo Cianconi; Federico Mucci; Lara Foresi; Ilaria Chiarantini; Alessandra Della Vecchia
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 7.963

Review 5.  The three frontlines against COVID-19: Brain, Behavior, and Immunity.

Authors:  Shao-Cheng Wang; Kuan-Pin Su; Carmine M Pariante
Journal:  Brain Behav Immun       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 7.217

6.  Fear and depression during the COVID-19 outbreak in Cameroon: a nation-wide observational study.

Authors:  Joseph Nelson Siewe Fodjo; Leonard Ngarka; Wepnyu Y Njamnshi; Leonard N Nfor; Michel K Mengnjo; Edwige Laure Mendo; Samuel A Angwafor; Jonas Guy Atchou Basseguin; Cyrille Nkouonlack; Edith N Njit; Nene Ahidjo; Eric S Chokote; Fidèle Dema; Julius Y Fonsah; Godwin Y Tatah; Nancy Palmer; Paul F Seke Etet; Dennis Palmer; Dickson S Nsagha; Daniel E Etya'ale; Stephen Perrig; Roman Sztajzel; Jean-Marie Annoni; Anne-Cécile Zoung-Kanyi Bissek; Rose G F Leke; Marie-Thérèse Abena Ondoa Obama; John N Nkengasong; Robert Colebunders; Alfred K Njamnshi
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2021-07-15       Impact factor: 3.630

7.  COVID-Related Concerns, the Need for Help, and Perceived Microaggression among Young Ultra-Orthodox Jewish Respondents in Israel.

Authors:  Faiga Weiden; Michal Levinsky; Miriam Schiff; Nati Becker; Ruth Pat-Horenczyk; Rami Benbenishty
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-06-14       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Prevalence of Depression, Anxiety, Distress and Insomnia and Related Factors in Healthcare Workers During COVID-19 Pandemic in Turkey.

Authors:  Mustafa Kürşat Şahin; Servet Aker; Gülay Şahin; Aytül Karabekiroğlu
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2020-12

9.  Prevalence and correlates of suicidal ideation among the general population in China during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Le Shi; Jian-Yu Que; Zheng-An Lu; Yi-Miao Gong; Lin Liu; Yun-He Wang; Mao-Sheng Ran; Nisha Ravindran; Arun V Ravindran; Seena Fazel; Yan-Ping Bao; Jie Shi; Lin Lu
Journal:  Eur Psychiatry       Date:  2021-02-03       Impact factor: 5.361

10.  COVID-19 and eating disorders during confinement: Analysis of factors associated with resilience and aggravation of symptoms.

Authors:  Isabel Baenas; Elena Caravaca-Sanz; Roser Granero; Isabel Sánchez; Nadine Riesco; Giulia Testa; Cristina Vintró-Alcaraz; Janet Treasure; Susana Jiménez-Murcia; Fernando Fernández-Aranda
Journal:  Eur Eat Disord Rev       Date:  2020-08-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.