Benjamin S Spearman1, Cary A Kuliasha2, Jack W Judy2, Christine E Schmidt3. 1. J. Crayton Pruitt Family Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States. 2. Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States; Nanoscience Institute for Medical and Engineering Technology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States. 3. J. Crayton Pruitt Family Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States. Electronic address: schmidt@bme.ufl.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Biomimetic hydrogels used in tissue engineering can improve tissue regeneration and enable targeted cellular behavior; there is growing interest in combining hydrogels with microelectronics to create new neural interface platforms to help patient populations. However, effective processes must be developed to integrate flexible but relatively stiff (e.g., 1-10 GPa) microelectronic arrays within soft (e.g., 1-10 kPa) hydrogels. NEW METHOD: Here, a novel method for integrating polyimide microelectrode arrays within a biomimetic hydrogel scaffold is demonstrated for use as a tissue-engineered electronic nerve interface (TEENI). Tygon tubing and a series of 3D printed molds were used to facilitate hydrogel fabrication and device assembly. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHODS: Other comparable regenerative peripheral nerve interface technologies do not utilize the flexible microelectrode array design nor the hydrogel scaffold described here. These methods typically use stiff electrode arrays that are affixed to a similarly stiff implantable tube serving as the nerve guidance conduit. RESULTS: Our results indicate that there is a substantial mechanical mismatch between the flexible microelectronic arrays and the soft hydrogel. However, using the methods described here, there is consistent fabrication of these regenerative peripheral nerve interfaces suitable for implantation. CONCLUSIONS: The assembly process that was developed resulted in repeatable and consistent integration of microelectrode arrays within a soft tissue-engineered hydrogel. As reported elsewhere, these devices have been successfully implanted in a rat sciatic nerve model and yielded neural recordings. This process can be adapted for other applications and hydrogels in which flexible electronic materials are combined with soft regenerative scaffolds.
BACKGROUND: Biomimetic hydrogels used in tissue engineering can improve tissue regeneration and enable targeted cellular behavior; there is growing interest in combining hydrogels with microelectronics to create new neural interface platforms to help patient populations. However, effective processes must be developed to integrate flexible but relatively stiff (e.g., 1-10 GPa) microelectronic arrays within soft (e.g., 1-10 kPa) hydrogels. NEW METHOD: Here, a novel method for integrating polyimide microelectrode arrays within a biomimetic hydrogel scaffold is demonstrated for use as a tissue-engineered electronic nerve interface (TEENI). Tygon tubing and a series of 3D printed molds were used to facilitate hydrogel fabrication and device assembly. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHODS: Other comparable regenerative peripheral nerve interface technologies do not utilize the flexible microelectrode array design nor the hydrogel scaffold described here. These methods typically use stiff electrode arrays that are affixed to a similarly stiff implantable tube serving as the nerve guidance conduit. RESULTS: Our results indicate that there is a substantial mechanical mismatch between the flexible microelectronic arrays and the soft hydrogel. However, using the methods described here, there is consistent fabrication of these regenerative peripheral nerve interfaces suitable for implantation. CONCLUSIONS: The assembly process that was developed resulted in repeatable and consistent integration of microelectrode arrays within a soft tissue-engineered hydrogel. As reported elsewhere, these devices have been successfully implanted in a rat sciatic nerve model and yielded neural recordings. This process can be adapted for other applications and hydrogels in which flexible electronic materials are combined with soft regenerative scaffolds.
Authors: Isaac P Clements; Vivek J Mukhatyar; Akhil Srinivasan; John T Bentley; Dinal S Andreasen; Ravi V Bellamkonda Journal: IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng Date: 2012-09-28 Impact factor: 3.802
Authors: Mehdi Mehrali; Ashish Thakur; Christian Pablo Pennisi; Sepehr Talebian; Ayyoob Arpanaei; Mehdi Nikkhah; Alireza Dolatshahi-Pirouz Journal: Adv Mater Date: 2016-12-14 Impact factor: 30.849
Authors: K K Wang; I R Nemeth; B R Seckel; D P Chakalis-Haley; D A Swann; J W Kuo; D J Bryan; C L Cetrulo Journal: Microsurgery Date: 1998 Impact factor: 2.425
Authors: Mary Kasper; Bret Ellenbogen; Ryan Hardy; Madison Cydis; Jorge Mojica-Santiago; Abdullah Afridi; Benjamin S Spearman; Ishita Singh; Cary A Kuliasha; Eric Atkinson; Kevin J Otto; Jack W Judy; Carlos Rinaldi-Ramos; Christine E Schmidt Journal: Biomaterials Date: 2021-10-22 Impact factor: 15.304