Tannaz Moin1,2, Jessica M Harwood1, Carol M Mangione1,3, Nicholas Jackson1, Sam Ho4, Susan L Ettner1,3, O Kenrik Duru1. 1. David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA. 2. HSR&D Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation & Policy, VA Greater Los Angeles Health System. 3. Jonathan and Karin Fielding School of Public Health at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA. 4. UnitedHealthcare, Minnetonka, MN.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/ OBJECTIVES: Medicaid beneficiaries with diabetes have complex care needs. The Accountable Care Communities (ACC) Program is a practice-level intervention implemented by UnitedHealthcare to improve care for Medicaid beneficiaries. We examined changes in costs and utilization for Medicaid beneficiaries with diabetes assigned to ACC versus usual care practices. RESEARCH DESIGN: Interrupted time series with concurrent control group analysis, at the person-month level. The ACC was implemented in 14 states, and we selected comparison non-ACC practices from those states to control for state-level variation in Medicaid program. We adjusted the models for age, sex, race/ethnicity, comorbidities, seasonality, and state-by-year fixed effects. We examined the difference between ACC and non-ACC practices in changes in the time trends of expenditures and hospital and emergency room utilization, for the 4 largest categories of Medicaid eligibility [Temporary Assistance to Needy Families, Supplemental Security Income (without Medicare), Expansion, Dual-Eligible]. SUBJECTS/MEASURES: Eligibility and claims data from Medicaid adults with diabetes from 14 states between 2010 and 2016, before and after ACC implementation. RESULTS: Analyses included 1,200,460 person-months from 66,450 Medicaid patients with diabetes. ACC implementation was not associated with significant changes in outcome time trends, relative to comparators, for all Medicaid categories. CONCLUSIONS: Medicaid patients assigned to ACC practices had no changes in cost or utilization over 3 years of follow-up, compared with patients assigned to non-ACC practices. The ACC program may not reduce costs or utilization for Medicaid patients with diabetes.
BACKGROUND/ OBJECTIVES: Medicaid beneficiaries with diabetes have complex care needs. The Accountable Care Communities (ACC) Program is a practice-level intervention implemented by UnitedHealthcare to improve care for Medicaid beneficiaries. We examined changes in costs and utilization for Medicaid beneficiaries with diabetes assigned to ACC versus usual care practices. RESEARCH DESIGN: Interrupted time series with concurrent control group analysis, at the person-month level. The ACC was implemented in 14 states, and we selected comparison non-ACC practices from those states to control for state-level variation in Medicaid program. We adjusted the models for age, sex, race/ethnicity, comorbidities, seasonality, and state-by-year fixed effects. We examined the difference between ACC and non-ACC practices in changes in the time trends of expenditures and hospital and emergency room utilization, for the 4 largest categories of Medicaid eligibility [Temporary Assistance to Needy Families, Supplemental Security Income (without Medicare), Expansion, Dual-Eligible]. SUBJECTS/MEASURES: Eligibility and claims data from Medicaid adults with diabetes from 14 states between 2010 and 2016, before and after ACC implementation. RESULTS: Analyses included 1,200,460 person-months from 66,450 Medicaid patients with diabetes. ACC implementation was not associated with significant changes in outcome time trends, relative to comparators, for all Medicaid categories. CONCLUSIONS: Medicaid patients assigned to ACC practices had no changes in cost or utilization over 3 years of follow-up, compared with patients assigned to non-ACC practices. The ACC program may not reduce costs or utilization for Medicaid patients with diabetes.
Authors: Marshall H Chin; Anne C Kirchhoff; Amy E Schlotthauer; Jessica E Graber; Sydney E S Brown; Ann Rimington; Melinda L Drum; Cynthia T Schaefer; Loretta J Heuer; Elbert S Huang; Morgan E Shook; Hui Tang; Lawrence P Casalino Journal: J Ambul Care Manage Date: 2008 Oct-Dec
Authors: James A Wiley; Diane R Rittenhouse; Stephen M Shortell; Lawrence P Casalino; Patricia P Ramsay; Salma Bibi; Andrew M Ryan; Kennon R Copeland; Jeffrey A Alexander Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2015-01 Impact factor: 6.301
Authors: Walter R Hsiang; Adam Lukasiewicz; Mark Gentry; Chang-Yeon Kim; Michael P Leslie; Richard Pelker; Howard P Forman; Daniel H Wiznia Journal: Inquiry Date: 2019 Jan-Dec Impact factor: 1.730
Authors: O Kenrik Duru; Carol M Mangione; Hector P Rodriguez; Dennis Ross-Degnan; J Frank Wharam; Bernard Black; Abel Kho; Nathalie Huguet; Heather Angier; Victoria Mayer; David Siscovick; Jennifer L Kraschnewski; Lizheng Shi; Elizabeth Nauman; Edward W Gregg; Mohammed K Ali; Pamela Thornton; Steven Clauser Journal: Curr Diab Rep Date: 2018-02-05 Impact factor: 4.810
Authors: O Kenrik Duru; Jessica Harwood; Tannaz Moin; Nicholas J Jackson; Susan L Ettner; Arseniy Vasilyev; David G Mosley; Donna L O'Shea; Sam Ho; Carol M Mangione Journal: Med Care Date: 2020-06 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Peggah Khorrami; Michael S Sinha; Aditi Bhanja; Heidi L Allen; Aaron S Kesselheim; Benjamin D Sommers Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2022-01-04