Literature DB >> 32412952

Trends in Costs of Care and Utilization for Medicaid Patients With Diabetes in Accountable Care Communities.

Tannaz Moin1,2, Jessica M Harwood1, Carol M Mangione1,3, Nicholas Jackson1, Sam Ho4, Susan L Ettner1,3, O Kenrik Duru1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/
OBJECTIVES: Medicaid beneficiaries with diabetes have complex care needs. The Accountable Care Communities (ACC) Program is a practice-level intervention implemented by UnitedHealthcare to improve care for Medicaid beneficiaries. We examined changes in costs and utilization for Medicaid beneficiaries with diabetes assigned to ACC versus usual care practices. RESEARCH
DESIGN: Interrupted time series with concurrent control group analysis, at the person-month level. The ACC was implemented in 14 states, and we selected comparison non-ACC practices from those states to control for state-level variation in Medicaid program. We adjusted the models for age, sex, race/ethnicity, comorbidities, seasonality, and state-by-year fixed effects. We examined the difference between ACC and non-ACC practices in changes in the time trends of expenditures and hospital and emergency room utilization, for the 4 largest categories of Medicaid eligibility [Temporary Assistance to Needy Families, Supplemental Security Income (without Medicare), Expansion, Dual-Eligible]. SUBJECTS/MEASURES: Eligibility and claims data from Medicaid adults with diabetes from 14 states between 2010 and 2016, before and after ACC implementation.
RESULTS: Analyses included 1,200,460 person-months from 66,450 Medicaid patients with diabetes. ACC implementation was not associated with significant changes in outcome time trends, relative to comparators, for all Medicaid categories.
CONCLUSIONS: Medicaid patients assigned to ACC practices had no changes in cost or utilization over 3 years of follow-up, compared with patients assigned to non-ACC practices. The ACC program may not reduce costs or utilization for Medicaid patients with diabetes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32412952      PMCID: PMC8260093          DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001318

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   3.178


  23 in total

1.  Sustaining quality improvement in community health centers: perceptions of leaders and staff.

Authors:  Marshall H Chin; Anne C Kirchhoff; Amy E Schlotthauer; Jessica E Graber; Sydney E S Brown; Ann Rimington; Melinda L Drum; Cynthia T Schaefer; Loretta J Heuer; Elbert S Huang; Morgan E Shook; Hui Tang; Lawrence P Casalino
Journal:  J Ambul Care Manage       Date:  2008 Oct-Dec

2.  Managing chronic illness: physician practices increased the use of care management and medical home processes.

Authors:  James A Wiley; Diane R Rittenhouse; Stephen M Shortell; Lawrence P Casalino; Patricia P Ramsay; Salma Bibi; Andrew M Ryan; Kennon R Copeland; Jeffrey A Alexander
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 6.301

3.  Medicaid and marketplace eligibility changes will occur often in all states; policy options can ease impact.

Authors:  Benjamin D Sommers; John A Graves; Katherine Swartz; Sara Rosenbaum
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 6.301

Review 4.  Regression analysis for correlated data.

Authors:  K Y Liang; S L Zeger
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 21.981

Review 5.  Interventions to improve the management of diabetes in primary care, outpatient, and community settings: a systematic review.

Authors:  C M Renders; G D Valk; S J Griffin; E H Wagner; J T Eijk Van; W J Assendelft
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 19.112

6.  Barriers to Care and Health Care Utilization Among the Publicly Insured.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Allen; Kathleen T Call; Timothy J Beebe; Donna D McAlpine; Pamela Jo Johnson
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 7.  Use of interrupted time series analysis in evaluating health care quality improvements.

Authors:  Robert B Penfold; Fang Zhang
Journal:  Acad Pediatr       Date:  2013 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.107

8.  Medicaid Patients Have Greater Difficulty Scheduling Health Care Appointments Compared With Private Insurance Patients: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Walter R Hsiang; Adam Lukasiewicz; Mark Gentry; Chang-Yeon Kim; Michael P Leslie; Richard Pelker; Howard P Forman; Daniel H Wiznia
Journal:  Inquiry       Date:  2019 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 1.730

Review 9.  Introductory Overview of the Natural Experiments for Translation in Diabetes 2.0 (NEXT-D2) Network: Examining the Impact of US Health Policies and Practices to Prevent Diabetes and Its Complications.

Authors:  O Kenrik Duru; Carol M Mangione; Hector P Rodriguez; Dennis Ross-Degnan; J Frank Wharam; Bernard Black; Abel Kho; Nathalie Huguet; Heather Angier; Victoria Mayer; David Siscovick; Jennifer L Kraschnewski; Lizheng Shi; Elizabeth Nauman; Edward W Gregg; Mohammed K Ali; Pamela Thornton; Steven Clauser
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 4.810

10.  Evaluation of a National Care Coordination Program to Reduce Utilization Among High-cost, High-need Medicaid Beneficiaries With Diabetes.

Authors:  O Kenrik Duru; Jessica Harwood; Tannaz Moin; Nicholas J Jackson; Susan L Ettner; Arseniy Vasilyev; David G Mosley; Donna L O'Shea; Sam Ho; Carol M Mangione
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 2.983

View more
  1 in total

1.  Differences in Diabetic Prescription Drug Utilization and Costs Among Patients With Diabetes Enrolled in Colorado Marketplace and Medicaid Plans, 2014-2015.

Authors:  Peggah Khorrami; Michael S Sinha; Aditi Bhanja; Heidi L Allen; Aaron S Kesselheim; Benjamin D Sommers
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2022-01-04
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.