Literature DB >> 32412677

Microsurgical reconstruction in the time of COVID-19.

Vittorio Ramella1, Giovanni Papa1,2, Stefano Bottosso1, Vito Cazzato2, Zoran Marij Arnež1,2.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32412677      PMCID: PMC7273021          DOI: 10.1002/micr.30604

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microsurgery        ISSN: 0738-1085            Impact factor:   2.425


× No keyword cloud information.
Dear Editor, By April 11, 2020, 1,610,909 COVID‐19 cases have been reported globally, causing 99,691 confirmed deaths (www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019). The government imposed a lockdown and all health‐care institutions are taking precautions individually (Iacbucci, 2020). ASUGI, our health‐care institution, suspended all elective and non‐oncologic surgical procedures. For this reason, the plastic and reconstructive surgery unit is screening pre‐operatively all patients, candidates for non‐deferred surgery; this screening consists of: swab for COVID‐19 infection, physical examination, temperature assessment, chest X‐ray, ECG, blood chemistry tests, recent history of respiratory symptoms, GI symptoms, headache. In March 2020, a 50‐year‐old woman presented in our Plastic Surgery Clinic, with a 3 × 2.5 cm oral cavity cancer. A CT scan with contrast was performed and confirmed the presence of a lesion involving the floor of the mouth, the symphysis of the mandible and the left neck lymph nodes. It is well known that timely start of surgical treatment is associated with higher survival rates in patients with head and neck cancer (Graboyes et al., 2019). Based on these premises, Plastic and ENT surgery units agreed to operate the patient on April 1. Before the operation, the patient performed all requested pre‐operative screening tests. Testing for COVID‐19 was negative. In the OR, during the intubation and extubation, all health staff wore personal protective equipment (PPE). We performed a wide tumor excision, marginal mandibulectomy, bilateral functional lymph node dissection and soft tissue reconstruction with an ALT free flap. In the post‐operative period the patient spent the first night in a dedicated intensive care area, she was monitored with Licox PtO2 system (Arnez, Ramella, Papa, Novati, et al., 2019). After she was transferred to Plastic surgery unit, where she remained isolated for a further 7 days, until her second Covid‐19 testing was found negative. The post‐operative period was uneventful and without any complication. In April 2020, an 80‐year‐old man was admitted to our ER, with a Gustilo IIIA open tibial fracture after fall from high. The patient had metastatic urothelial cancer and was positive for COVID‐19. Our orthoplastic protocol (Arnez, Ramella, Papa, Galici, et al., 2019) consists of the first debridement, temporary bone fixation and coverage within 24 hr of trauma, followed by the definitive bone fixation and soft tissue coverage within 7 days after trauma. In this case, the first surgery was technically demanding due to the use of the PPE, impossibility to wear magnification loops and difficult communication between the members of the surgical team. For these reasons and for the patient's comorbidities, we decided on conservative non‐microsurgical treatment (debridement, external fixation and direct closure of the wound) to simplify the postoperative management of the Covid‐19 positive patient. Microsurgical free flap reconstructions are demanding surgeries that require long OR times and often intensive post‐operative care in ICU units. In this period of constrained resources, and necessity of wearing additional protective equipment, microsurgical reconstruction must be performed but only after careful case‐by‐case assessment because, even during Covid‐19 pandemia it is imperative for then health systems to guarantee the patients the best treatment. In borderline cases, when possible, in view of many additional difficulties, we suggest a more conservative approach.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare no conflict of interest and no financial disclosure.
  4 in total

1.  Is the LICOX® PtO2 system reliable for monitoring of free flaps? Comparison between two cohorts of patients.

Authors:  Zoran Marij Arnež; Vittorio Ramella; Giovanni Papa; Federico Cesare Novati; Elisa Manca; Sara Leuzzi; Chiara Stocco
Journal:  Microsurgery       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 2.425

2.  The sooner the better? Patients' satisfaction following ortho-plastic treatment of lower limb open fractures within and after one week from injury.

Authors:  Zoran Marij Arnež; Vittorio Ramella; Giovanni Papa; Silvia Galici; Luigi Murena; Stefano Gulli; Chiara Stocco
Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg       Date:  2019-04-09       Impact factor: 2.740

3.  Covid-19: all non-urgent elective surgery is suspended for at least three months in England.

Authors:  Gareth Iacobucci
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2020-03-18

4.  Association of Treatment Delays With Survival for Patients With Head and Neck Cancer: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Evan M Graboyes; Anvesh R Kompelli; David M Neskey; Emily Brennan; Shaun Nguyen; Katherine R Sterba; Graham W Warren; Chanita Hughes-Halbert; Brian Nussenbaum; Terry A Day
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 6.223

  4 in total
  2 in total

1.  Management of skin damage of health workers' face: the role of plastic surgery in the time of Pandemic.

Authors:  Roberto Cuomo; Francesco Ruben Giardino; Mirco Pozzi; Giuseppe Nisi; Andrea Sisti; Jingjian Han; Angelo Nuzzo; Alessia Muratori; Emanuele Cigna; Luigi Losco; Luca Grimaldi
Journal:  Acta Biomed       Date:  2021-05-12

2.  Reconstruction of COVID-19 vasculitis-related thumb necrosis with a microsurgical free flap.

Authors:  María José Morales-Perez; Irene Gallardo-Calero; Danilo Rivas-Nicolls; Sebastià Gelabert Mestre; Ignacio Garcia Forcada; Francisco Soldado
Journal:  Microsurgery       Date:  2021-02-13       Impact factor: 2.080

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.